Hi Mohit here, feel free to leave a message for me anytime. Thank You.
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Wikipedia:Mahesh Pandey, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Praxidicae ( talk) 12:58, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to remove speedy deletion notices from pages you created yourself, as you did at
Mahesh Pandey, you may be
blocked from editing.
Praxidicae (
talk)
13:59, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove a
speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did at
Mahesh Pandey.
Praxidicae (
talk)
14:09, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Mahesh Pandey, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
Praxidicae (
talk)
14:38, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello, Mohit235!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
Praxidicae (
talk)
14:48, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
|
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Sulfurboy ( talk) 19:28, 9 February 2020 (UTC)An article you recently created,
Guroudev Bhalla, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
Cabayi (
talk)
10:38, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
Hello Mohit235. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.
Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.
Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the
Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at
User:Mohit235. The template {{
Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Mohit235|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}
. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message.
331dot (
talk)
11:01, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
Again, if you personally took the image of Mr. Pandey, fine. What is your connection with Mr. Pandey, since you were at his event and he posed for you when you took the image? If you didn't personally take the image of Mr. Bhalla, you need to address that as I have indicated. You will be blocked from editing if you do not adequately address these concerns. Copyright violations potentially put Wikipedia in legal jeopardy, so we must take copyright matters seriously. 331dot ( talk) 12:40, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
331dot (
talk)
13:04, 17 October 2023 (UTC)Mohit235 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Dear Wikipedia Team, 331dot, this guy is completely against me. I have contributed a lot for Wikipedia. But this guy is totally considering my work as wastage. Please someone else go through my contributions and then decide I should be blocked or unblocked. Thank you. Mohit235 ( talk) 13:40, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Your copyright violations were certainly inappropriate and need to be addressed. You also need to address the concerns of WP:UPE. Yamla ( talk) 14:10, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Mohit235 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Dear Admin, This block is no longer necessary because I that I made a mistake by using someone else's image, causing copyright issue. However there were no consequence after this act and the image was also removed from Wiki Media. I will not do it again, will continue to make productive contributions as always.
Decline reason:
Now you need to address the concerns of WP:UPE. --jpgordon 𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 17:14, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Mohit235 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Dear Admin, WP:UPE isn't relevant to me. I did it by mistake. Neither I was offered to this nor anyone guided me to do so. I just used an image and that is now deleted. So this doesn't apply on me. It was just a basic mistake. Please unblock. Thank You.
Decline reason:
I do not believe this was "by mistake". There are still issues with violations of copyright as well that are unaddressed. RickinBaltimore ( talk) 13:30, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
There is a Mohit who works for Mahesh Pandey Productions. Is that you? -- Yamla ( talk) 11:55, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page. |
Dear Admin,
Please review my unblock request. Its been couple of days of block. WP: UPE is invalid for me. Please consider my request. Thanks Mohit235 ( talk) 16:15, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Mohit235. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:Guroudev Bhalla Screens, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please
edit it again or
request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 15:05, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
Hi Mohit here, feel free to leave a message for me anytime. Thank You.
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Wikipedia:Mahesh Pandey, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Praxidicae ( talk) 12:58, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to remove speedy deletion notices from pages you created yourself, as you did at
Mahesh Pandey, you may be
blocked from editing.
Praxidicae (
talk)
13:59, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove a
speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did at
Mahesh Pandey.
Praxidicae (
talk)
14:09, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Mahesh Pandey, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
Praxidicae (
talk)
14:38, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello, Mohit235!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
Praxidicae (
talk)
14:48, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
|
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Sulfurboy ( talk) 19:28, 9 February 2020 (UTC)An article you recently created,
Guroudev Bhalla, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
Cabayi (
talk)
10:38, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
Hello Mohit235. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.
Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.
Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the
Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at
User:Mohit235. The template {{
Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Mohit235|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}
. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message.
331dot (
talk)
11:01, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
Again, if you personally took the image of Mr. Pandey, fine. What is your connection with Mr. Pandey, since you were at his event and he posed for you when you took the image? If you didn't personally take the image of Mr. Bhalla, you need to address that as I have indicated. You will be blocked from editing if you do not adequately address these concerns. Copyright violations potentially put Wikipedia in legal jeopardy, so we must take copyright matters seriously. 331dot ( talk) 12:40, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
331dot (
talk)
13:04, 17 October 2023 (UTC)Mohit235 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Dear Wikipedia Team, 331dot, this guy is completely against me. I have contributed a lot for Wikipedia. But this guy is totally considering my work as wastage. Please someone else go through my contributions and then decide I should be blocked or unblocked. Thank you. Mohit235 ( talk) 13:40, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Your copyright violations were certainly inappropriate and need to be addressed. You also need to address the concerns of WP:UPE. Yamla ( talk) 14:10, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Mohit235 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Dear Admin, This block is no longer necessary because I that I made a mistake by using someone else's image, causing copyright issue. However there were no consequence after this act and the image was also removed from Wiki Media. I will not do it again, will continue to make productive contributions as always.
Decline reason:
Now you need to address the concerns of WP:UPE. --jpgordon 𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 17:14, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Mohit235 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Dear Admin, WP:UPE isn't relevant to me. I did it by mistake. Neither I was offered to this nor anyone guided me to do so. I just used an image and that is now deleted. So this doesn't apply on me. It was just a basic mistake. Please unblock. Thank You.
Decline reason:
I do not believe this was "by mistake". There are still issues with violations of copyright as well that are unaddressed. RickinBaltimore ( talk) 13:30, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
There is a Mohit who works for Mahesh Pandey Productions. Is that you? -- Yamla ( talk) 11:55, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page. |
Dear Admin,
Please review my unblock request. Its been couple of days of block. WP: UPE is invalid for me. Please consider my request. Thanks Mohit235 ( talk) 16:15, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Mohit235. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:Guroudev Bhalla Screens, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please
edit it again or
request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 15:05, 7 April 2024 (UTC)