Hi Mohd.maaz864! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.
Happy editing! Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 17:33, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
Hello, Mohd.maaz864. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
is there any reason why you're peppering all of your talk page replies with trademark symbols? ViperSnake151 Talk 17:26, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Doug Weller talk 10:15, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in climate change. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Doug Weller talk 10:20, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Snooganssnoogans ( talk) 01:13, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Hi there. I can tell you're doing your best to contribute and that you're pretty frustrated by the way things work here. I want to help you succeed here, so I have a few pointers:
An example sentence hereshould be removed because the source that supports it is not reliable in this context and because it does not present a neutral point of view." and then gave your reasoning afterwards.
Just a reminder-'buzz' — presuming you're not receiving timely notices( read notifications).( Totally try to ignore this: Guess I've to extend my wait for a week further.. Ahh! Damn superstition!)[1] are almost impossible to parse.
Do not use the ™ and ® symbols, or similar, in either article text or citations, unless unavoidably necessary for context.). It can get really annoying in talk page posts; they aren't legally required and they look like marketing, which can be very irritating for Wikipedians.
Fffuuuuuucccck! Editing from flashy, bare-bones "Wikipedia Lite" interface is so tedious. For anybody concerned, please ref to the Edit Note.[2] can reduce your credibility greatly.
Your Highness. That said, experienced users (including administrators) often provide very good advice, especially about the things that aren't explicitly covered in policy.
Best, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 17:46, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
About your last edit, i'm sorry for reverting that. I thought it was unconstructive, but it's not. It was an accident. I din't had time to review your edit because i was busy. Thanks for asking. PedroLucasDBr ( talk) 20:29, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Mohd.maaz864. Thank you. Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 20:20, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
RickinBaltimore (
talk) 22:00, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
( block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Hi Mohd.maaz864! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.
Happy editing! Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 17:33, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
Hello, Mohd.maaz864. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
is there any reason why you're peppering all of your talk page replies with trademark symbols? ViperSnake151 Talk 17:26, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Doug Weller talk 10:15, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in climate change. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Doug Weller talk 10:20, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Snooganssnoogans ( talk) 01:13, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Hi there. I can tell you're doing your best to contribute and that you're pretty frustrated by the way things work here. I want to help you succeed here, so I have a few pointers:
An example sentence hereshould be removed because the source that supports it is not reliable in this context and because it does not present a neutral point of view." and then gave your reasoning afterwards.
Just a reminder-'buzz' — presuming you're not receiving timely notices( read notifications).( Totally try to ignore this: Guess I've to extend my wait for a week further.. Ahh! Damn superstition!)[1] are almost impossible to parse.
Do not use the ™ and ® symbols, or similar, in either article text or citations, unless unavoidably necessary for context.). It can get really annoying in talk page posts; they aren't legally required and they look like marketing, which can be very irritating for Wikipedians.
Fffuuuuuucccck! Editing from flashy, bare-bones "Wikipedia Lite" interface is so tedious. For anybody concerned, please ref to the Edit Note.[2] can reduce your credibility greatly.
Your Highness. That said, experienced users (including administrators) often provide very good advice, especially about the things that aren't explicitly covered in policy.
Best, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 17:46, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
About your last edit, i'm sorry for reverting that. I thought it was unconstructive, but it's not. It was an accident. I din't had time to review your edit because i was busy. Thanks for asking. PedroLucasDBr ( talk) 20:29, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Mohd.maaz864. Thank you. Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 20:20, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
RickinBaltimore (
talk) 22:00, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
( block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))