Roman Catholicism is correct, and consistent with the corresponding fields for other articles. Please stop changing this field. Endymion.12 ( talk) 19:07, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
Hi. Saw you corrected some of the Swedish nobles religion after an IP had been there Maybe you could check the other edits to by the user. see here. I think it is the same error on more places. Best regards Adville ( talk) 06:48, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I’m the user you were talking about. I was looking at the edit histories on the pages, and it turns out I was indeed correct. Maybe you could change it back? Thanks, User:37.205.120.66 ( talk) 08:40, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
Please stop modifying the religion parameter for European royalty/nobility articles. The changes you have made are either incorrect or have made the field less specific, and you have consistently failed to explain your changes in edit summaries or on the talk page. At this point I am considering WP:ANI since you have been unresponsive here. Endymion.12 ( talk) 23:43, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Doniago. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article,
Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 1, but you didn't provide a
reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to
include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the
tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
DonIago (
talk)
20:34, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at
It (2017 film), without citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.
– Wallyfromdilbert (
talk)
20:43, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at The Lion King (2019 film), you may be blocked from editing. The lions in the film were not actual lions filmed playing the roles. Ditto the hyenas, gazelles, and every other animal. That would have been "live action". Instead, they were computer generated animations. If you do not understand the difference, discuss the issue on the article's talk page.
When you make an edit and someone reverts it, if you do not understand why, discuss the issue on the article's talk page before continuing. SummerPhD v2.0 21:27, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you
disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at
The Lion King (2019 film). SummerPhD
v2.0
21:42, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
The Lion King (2019 film); that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. GirthSummit (blether) 15:21, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
at the bottom of this page, replacing the words "Your reason here" with an explanation of why you think you should be unblocked. Some of your editing looks like deliberate vandalism, but I am giving you the benefit of the doubt, and assuming you have merely made honest mistakes, which is why this block is for a limited time. However, please take note that if similar editing continues after this block is over, you may possibly be blocked for much longer.
JBW (
talk) Formerly JamesBWatson
16:01, 17 November 2019 (UTC) {{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Guy (
help!)
01:07, 25 November 2019 (UTC)This is due to your failure to engage here or on any article talk page. Any unblock will depend on you starting to recognise the issues identifies above Guy ( help!) 01:08, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
Roman Catholicism is correct, and consistent with the corresponding fields for other articles. Please stop changing this field. Endymion.12 ( talk) 19:07, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
Hi. Saw you corrected some of the Swedish nobles religion after an IP had been there Maybe you could check the other edits to by the user. see here. I think it is the same error on more places. Best regards Adville ( talk) 06:48, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I’m the user you were talking about. I was looking at the edit histories on the pages, and it turns out I was indeed correct. Maybe you could change it back? Thanks, User:37.205.120.66 ( talk) 08:40, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
Please stop modifying the religion parameter for European royalty/nobility articles. The changes you have made are either incorrect or have made the field less specific, and you have consistently failed to explain your changes in edit summaries or on the talk page. At this point I am considering WP:ANI since you have been unresponsive here. Endymion.12 ( talk) 23:43, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Doniago. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article,
Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 1, but you didn't provide a
reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to
include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the
tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
DonIago (
talk)
20:34, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at
It (2017 film), without citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.
– Wallyfromdilbert (
talk)
20:43, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at The Lion King (2019 film), you may be blocked from editing. The lions in the film were not actual lions filmed playing the roles. Ditto the hyenas, gazelles, and every other animal. That would have been "live action". Instead, they were computer generated animations. If you do not understand the difference, discuss the issue on the article's talk page.
When you make an edit and someone reverts it, if you do not understand why, discuss the issue on the article's talk page before continuing. SummerPhD v2.0 21:27, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you
disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at
The Lion King (2019 film). SummerPhD
v2.0
21:42, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
The Lion King (2019 film); that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. GirthSummit (blether) 15:21, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
at the bottom of this page, replacing the words "Your reason here" with an explanation of why you think you should be unblocked. Some of your editing looks like deliberate vandalism, but I am giving you the benefit of the doubt, and assuming you have merely made honest mistakes, which is why this block is for a limited time. However, please take note that if similar editing continues after this block is over, you may possibly be blocked for much longer.
JBW (
talk) Formerly JamesBWatson
16:01, 17 November 2019 (UTC) {{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Guy (
help!)
01:07, 25 November 2019 (UTC)This is due to your failure to engage here or on any article talk page. Any unblock will depend on you starting to recognise the issues identifies above Guy ( help!) 01:08, 25 November 2019 (UTC)