Hello Modargo and welcome to Wikipedia! Hope you like it here, and stick around.
Here are some tips to help you get started:
Good luck!
I have – for the time being – protected the article on Deism. Please discuss any changes you want to make with other interested parties at Talk:Deism instead of continually reverting each other. Thank you. (CC also to the other party in this revert war.) Lupo 14:26, 16 Aug 2004 (UTC) (Sorry for having posted this first in the wrong place.)
At Wikipedia talk:Deletion policy#Proposed new rule: No repeat submission of articles, you raised the concern that the poll was not well structured for people's actual votes. I've proposed a revote in a different format. I'd appreciate your comments and changes before people start really using the table. Rossami 14:48, 29 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Many warm and sincere salutations!!! Are you a new editor that recently joined the community? If so, I bid you welcome.
I was about to add the Episode 21 and 22 English titles and add in the Episode 20 synopsis here tonight when I noticed your handiwork. There is not much that I can complain about it except for a few spelling errors and that contractions detract from the ambiance of Wikipedia being an encyclopedia which I have already corrected; still, I am at a loss for the reasoning behind the revisions that were made for the first eleven episodes. The Revision History documents the great pains I have taken to keep all the episode synopses quite brief and I am at a loss for what objection anybody could raise. I would like for you to please leave a message on my talk page to discuss the matter.
Dairi no Kenkyo ( talk) 04:25, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
It seems that you have been quite active here over the course of June 4, Modargo. Along with an exhortation to please keep up the good work is a confession that the vocabulary that you saw used in the episode synopses I wrote reflects the fact that I used to as a kid and occasionally still read the dictionary for fun.
There is another Wikipedia editor that seems rather hostile and unaccommodating over what is simply normal operation for me ever since I joined the Wikipedia community . . . I do hope those sentiments of his cool down somewhat so that he and I can harmoniously work alongside each other. While I did learn to not be so pedantic with my episode synopses, it seems that these efforts are not enough. Perhaps I am overlooking something crucial . . .
Dairi no Kenkyo ( talk) 15:49, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
Dear Modargo, I hope now it's better... Swans is cited also on important articles on human rights, or on britannica.com. Regards, -- Egonon ( talk) 09:05, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
File:APT logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, it is currently
orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.
You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot ( talk) 04:05, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Tripetrol, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Fdizile ( developer) 18:54, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
The article Tripetrol has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
GB
fan
00:48, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
12:48, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello Modargo and welcome to Wikipedia! Hope you like it here, and stick around.
Here are some tips to help you get started:
Good luck!
I have – for the time being – protected the article on Deism. Please discuss any changes you want to make with other interested parties at Talk:Deism instead of continually reverting each other. Thank you. (CC also to the other party in this revert war.) Lupo 14:26, 16 Aug 2004 (UTC) (Sorry for having posted this first in the wrong place.)
At Wikipedia talk:Deletion policy#Proposed new rule: No repeat submission of articles, you raised the concern that the poll was not well structured for people's actual votes. I've proposed a revote in a different format. I'd appreciate your comments and changes before people start really using the table. Rossami 14:48, 29 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Many warm and sincere salutations!!! Are you a new editor that recently joined the community? If so, I bid you welcome.
I was about to add the Episode 21 and 22 English titles and add in the Episode 20 synopsis here tonight when I noticed your handiwork. There is not much that I can complain about it except for a few spelling errors and that contractions detract from the ambiance of Wikipedia being an encyclopedia which I have already corrected; still, I am at a loss for the reasoning behind the revisions that were made for the first eleven episodes. The Revision History documents the great pains I have taken to keep all the episode synopses quite brief and I am at a loss for what objection anybody could raise. I would like for you to please leave a message on my talk page to discuss the matter.
Dairi no Kenkyo ( talk) 04:25, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
It seems that you have been quite active here over the course of June 4, Modargo. Along with an exhortation to please keep up the good work is a confession that the vocabulary that you saw used in the episode synopses I wrote reflects the fact that I used to as a kid and occasionally still read the dictionary for fun.
There is another Wikipedia editor that seems rather hostile and unaccommodating over what is simply normal operation for me ever since I joined the Wikipedia community . . . I do hope those sentiments of his cool down somewhat so that he and I can harmoniously work alongside each other. While I did learn to not be so pedantic with my episode synopses, it seems that these efforts are not enough. Perhaps I am overlooking something crucial . . .
Dairi no Kenkyo ( talk) 15:49, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
Dear Modargo, I hope now it's better... Swans is cited also on important articles on human rights, or on britannica.com. Regards, -- Egonon ( talk) 09:05, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
File:APT logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, it is currently
orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.
You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot ( talk) 04:05, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Tripetrol, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Fdizile ( developer) 18:54, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
The article Tripetrol has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
GB
fan
00:48, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
12:48, 23 November 2015 (UTC)