I have reverted again the section you added back to this article. You will know, since you mistakenly included them, that the section was originally removed following a set of stylistic guidelines. It was not encyclopaedic, just a list of trivia with no explained significance within the life and work of John Donne; also it was without references and so counted as original research WP:OR. Sweetpool50 ( talk) 10:20, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
I have reverted again the section you added back to this article. You will know, since you mistakenly included them, that the section was originally removed following a set of stylistic guidelines. It was not encyclopaedic, just a list of trivia with no explained significance within the life and work of John Donne; also it was without references and so counted as original research WP:OR. Sweetpool50 ( talk) 10:20, 18 November 2017 (UTC)