Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia, in particular to Covariant transformation.
Thank you also for your contributions to discussions about the articles. I saw that you have made many improvements to your own discussion contributions. I like that.
If you would like to further improve your work, here are a few wiki editing tips:
You have sometimes replied to other discussion participants. It is custom to use colons (":") in the wiki source text to indent such replies. See Help:Wikitext#Indent_text for examples.
In your discussion contributions, you have enclosed external hyperlinks with *two* pairs of square brackets, like this: [[http://...]]. If you look closely, you can see that this results in something like "[[5]^]", or "[ 5]", to be more precise. The results show a visible pair of square brackets, which is usually not intended. Double square brackets are only for internal wiki links. For external links, use single square brackets, or have a look at Help:Wikitext#External_links for more options.
You have explicitly stated that you are offering your discussion contributions as material for improving the articles themselves. Some of your discussion contributions regarding HIsarna read a bit like a journalistic article or discussion (which is what they are, of course). This may make it harder than needed to integrate your efforts. I do not know whether your suggestions have been integrated, or whether they are good or not. But in my view, your writing style is good, so I encourage you to simply make article improvements yourself, as opposed to suggesting that others do it. Yes, this is hard work. But reading your discussion contributions, I see research and phrasing effort, and you seem to know a great deal about very specific subjects. And I get the impression that you are up for hard work. So Wikipedia:Be Bold! :-)
Regards, RainerBlome ( talk) 00:23, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia, in particular to Covariant transformation.
Thank you also for your contributions to discussions about the articles. I saw that you have made many improvements to your own discussion contributions. I like that.
If you would like to further improve your work, here are a few wiki editing tips:
You have sometimes replied to other discussion participants. It is custom to use colons (":") in the wiki source text to indent such replies. See Help:Wikitext#Indent_text for examples.
In your discussion contributions, you have enclosed external hyperlinks with *two* pairs of square brackets, like this: [[http://...]]. If you look closely, you can see that this results in something like "[[5]^]", or "[ 5]", to be more precise. The results show a visible pair of square brackets, which is usually not intended. Double square brackets are only for internal wiki links. For external links, use single square brackets, or have a look at Help:Wikitext#External_links for more options.
You have explicitly stated that you are offering your discussion contributions as material for improving the articles themselves. Some of your discussion contributions regarding HIsarna read a bit like a journalistic article or discussion (which is what they are, of course). This may make it harder than needed to integrate your efforts. I do not know whether your suggestions have been integrated, or whether they are good or not. But in my view, your writing style is good, so I encourage you to simply make article improvements yourself, as opposed to suggesting that others do it. Yes, this is hard work. But reading your discussion contributions, I see research and phrasing effort, and you seem to know a great deal about very specific subjects. And I get the impression that you are up for hard work. So Wikipedia:Be Bold! :-)
Regards, RainerBlome ( talk) 00:23, 15 November 2020 (UTC)