You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.
Thank you.
A tag has been placed on Nefsis, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.
If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{
hangon}}
on the top of
Nefsis and leave a note on
the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any
citations from independent
reliable sources to ensure that the article will be
verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
71.41.210.146 (
talk)
03:25, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.
Thank you.
A tag has been placed on WiredRed requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.
If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
As an employee at WiredRed you should not be creating or editing articles on the company or its products. Please see WP:COI. Guy ( Help!) 13:19, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
I now understand that i am unable to write articles about companies I work for but I only created this page because people were asking why we didn't have a wiki page and why software such as Live meeting, Webex, live meeting, Zoho did. I tried to base my page as close to the templates set out by the companies mentioned above and feel that it was easily as neutral as some of the other articles. Not having a Wiki page puts us at a distinct disadvantage as we cant effectively be on pages such as Comparison_of_web_conferencing_software. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mjrenwick ( talk • contribs) 16:13, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
We clearly are not relying on wikipeadia for our marketing but one of the most powerful marketing tools at the moment is google and searching for web conferencing always ranks Wiki pages very highly. As I understand it, Wikipedia would appear to be an online Encyclopedia, i.e. a work containing factual articles on subjects in every field of knowledge or, as the Oxford English Dictionary (the premier dictionary of the English language – according to Wikipedia) defines it: n. book, often in a number of volumes, giving information on many subjects, or on many aspects of one subject.
Nefsis is 5th generation of ePop (as explained in deleted Wikipedia page, if you run your Google fight with this name you will see we fair a little better
http://www.googlefight.com/index.php?lang=en_GB&word1=webex&word2=epop
Having said that, the wikipedia entry for “google fight” clearly states: “People often use this for entertainment by implying one subject is better than another, such as Microsoft vs. Google, with Google the winner. It can also be used as a measure of competitiveness; Salam Pax posted a Googlefight result between himself and Raed Jarrar on their blog in 2002, as their worldwide readership rose in the prelude to the 2003 invasion of Iraq.”
Googlefight has been highlighted as an example of a site making money from contextual advertising, as well as one that derives its longevity from community participation (in this case, the always changing search terms).
Are you stating, officially, that wikipedia is to be merely taken as an object of derision and/or that there can be no level playing field or have I missed something?
In a world that Wikipedia is seen as an objective, as opposed to subjective, reference it would appear that you are stating that the size of company is the defining factor. Can you please officially confirm this statement?
In terms of size of company we are smaller than Webex but in terms of the technology we are an industry leader which has been recognised recently by Frost and Sullivan: http://www.frost.com/prod/servlet/meawards-hall-of-fame-feature.pag?mode=open&sid=189742511
With regard to edits by connected parties, again drawing reference to WebEx, I must say that there would appear to be evidence of nepotism here: http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=User:Steven_li&oldid=202656489
Not only is it a blatant admission but Mr Li’s job title is “Vice President, Technology Innovations at Webex Communications, Inc”
What happened to the Wikivision?:
Imagine a world in which every single human being can freely share in the sum of all knowledge. That's our commitment.
Please can you confirm which definition of spamming you are referring to? I don’t feel that my article is guilty of either Wikipedia’s definition of Spam or Wiki Spam and I am only trying to expand the depth of Wikipedia’s knowledge in this particular industry which I feel is under represented. It would be nice if you would respond to the questions I have raised. I would also be happy to demonstrate the software to you so that you can make an informed/educated decision.
Before asking customers/experts in the field to re-write the entries for me I would like to know which part of the articles would be deemed unacceptable? Can you also confirm that CTO of Webex gets away with it because they are a big company? If these articles were written by a third party would they have been accepted? Hope you have a good weekend, the forecast is looking wonderful
Thanks for uploading File:Wiredred Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}
to your talk page.
Thank you.
DASHBot (
talk)
04:47, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Nefsis_logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Melesse ( talk) 22:51, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.
Thank you.
A tag has been placed on Nefsis, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.
If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{
hangon}}
on the top of
Nefsis and leave a note on
the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any
citations from independent
reliable sources to ensure that the article will be
verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
71.41.210.146 (
talk)
03:25, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.
Thank you.
A tag has been placed on WiredRed requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.
If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
As an employee at WiredRed you should not be creating or editing articles on the company or its products. Please see WP:COI. Guy ( Help!) 13:19, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
I now understand that i am unable to write articles about companies I work for but I only created this page because people were asking why we didn't have a wiki page and why software such as Live meeting, Webex, live meeting, Zoho did. I tried to base my page as close to the templates set out by the companies mentioned above and feel that it was easily as neutral as some of the other articles. Not having a Wiki page puts us at a distinct disadvantage as we cant effectively be on pages such as Comparison_of_web_conferencing_software. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mjrenwick ( talk • contribs) 16:13, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
We clearly are not relying on wikipeadia for our marketing but one of the most powerful marketing tools at the moment is google and searching for web conferencing always ranks Wiki pages very highly. As I understand it, Wikipedia would appear to be an online Encyclopedia, i.e. a work containing factual articles on subjects in every field of knowledge or, as the Oxford English Dictionary (the premier dictionary of the English language – according to Wikipedia) defines it: n. book, often in a number of volumes, giving information on many subjects, or on many aspects of one subject.
Nefsis is 5th generation of ePop (as explained in deleted Wikipedia page, if you run your Google fight with this name you will see we fair a little better
http://www.googlefight.com/index.php?lang=en_GB&word1=webex&word2=epop
Having said that, the wikipedia entry for “google fight” clearly states: “People often use this for entertainment by implying one subject is better than another, such as Microsoft vs. Google, with Google the winner. It can also be used as a measure of competitiveness; Salam Pax posted a Googlefight result between himself and Raed Jarrar on their blog in 2002, as their worldwide readership rose in the prelude to the 2003 invasion of Iraq.”
Googlefight has been highlighted as an example of a site making money from contextual advertising, as well as one that derives its longevity from community participation (in this case, the always changing search terms).
Are you stating, officially, that wikipedia is to be merely taken as an object of derision and/or that there can be no level playing field or have I missed something?
In a world that Wikipedia is seen as an objective, as opposed to subjective, reference it would appear that you are stating that the size of company is the defining factor. Can you please officially confirm this statement?
In terms of size of company we are smaller than Webex but in terms of the technology we are an industry leader which has been recognised recently by Frost and Sullivan: http://www.frost.com/prod/servlet/meawards-hall-of-fame-feature.pag?mode=open&sid=189742511
With regard to edits by connected parties, again drawing reference to WebEx, I must say that there would appear to be evidence of nepotism here: http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=User:Steven_li&oldid=202656489
Not only is it a blatant admission but Mr Li’s job title is “Vice President, Technology Innovations at Webex Communications, Inc”
What happened to the Wikivision?:
Imagine a world in which every single human being can freely share in the sum of all knowledge. That's our commitment.
Please can you confirm which definition of spamming you are referring to? I don’t feel that my article is guilty of either Wikipedia’s definition of Spam or Wiki Spam and I am only trying to expand the depth of Wikipedia’s knowledge in this particular industry which I feel is under represented. It would be nice if you would respond to the questions I have raised. I would also be happy to demonstrate the software to you so that you can make an informed/educated decision.
Before asking customers/experts in the field to re-write the entries for me I would like to know which part of the articles would be deemed unacceptable? Can you also confirm that CTO of Webex gets away with it because they are a big company? If these articles were written by a third party would they have been accepted? Hope you have a good weekend, the forecast is looking wonderful
Thanks for uploading File:Wiredred Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}
to your talk page.
Thank you.
DASHBot (
talk)
04:47, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Nefsis_logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Melesse ( talk) 22:51, 4 June 2010 (UTC)