It has been established that you engaged in
sockpuppetry by evidence presented here: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mathsci, and you are therefore blocked indefinitely. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{
unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our
guide to appealing blocks first.
MuZemike 07:14, 29 September 2009 (UTC) |
Note that this was all confirmed by CheckUser in the report you submitted. MuZemike 07:14, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
Mister Collins ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
My understanding is that sockpuppetry is "fraudulent, disruptive or oherwise deceptive" conduct. I deny all three accusations. In fact, I have been helping to track down sockpuppets, vote stackers, hoaxers and software bugs. Please review my record and allow me to continue contributing.
Decline reason:
Well you say it yourself, you are not a brand new user and personally I feel using an alternative account to accuse another editor of being a socvk is plain stupid so I'd suggest you got what you deserved. Please feel free to continue to edit with your main account if its not blocked, and if it is, well I think we know what the word for that it don't we. ((psst: the word rhymes with lock Spartaz Humbug! 19:45, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Can you provide any further information about how you happened to become interested in this user and how you happened to join Wikipedia to deal with it? It seems improbable that you are a brand-new user who stumbled upon User: Mathsci purely by coincidence. - FisherQueen ( talk · contribs) 21:06, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
It has been established that you engaged in
sockpuppetry by evidence presented here: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mathsci, and you are therefore blocked indefinitely. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{
unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our
guide to appealing blocks first.
MuZemike 07:14, 29 September 2009 (UTC) |
Note that this was all confirmed by CheckUser in the report you submitted. MuZemike 07:14, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
Mister Collins ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
My understanding is that sockpuppetry is "fraudulent, disruptive or oherwise deceptive" conduct. I deny all three accusations. In fact, I have been helping to track down sockpuppets, vote stackers, hoaxers and software bugs. Please review my record and allow me to continue contributing.
Decline reason:
Well you say it yourself, you are not a brand new user and personally I feel using an alternative account to accuse another editor of being a socvk is plain stupid so I'd suggest you got what you deserved. Please feel free to continue to edit with your main account if its not blocked, and if it is, well I think we know what the word for that it don't we. ((psst: the word rhymes with lock Spartaz Humbug! 19:45, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Can you provide any further information about how you happened to become interested in this user and how you happened to join Wikipedia to deal with it? It seems improbable that you are a brand-new user who stumbled upon User: Mathsci purely by coincidence. - FisherQueen ( talk · contribs) 21:06, 29 September 2009 (UTC)