Your recent addition of paraconsistent logic to Law of thought, needs references to avoid looking like original research, which could leave it vulnerable to reversal. ~~ BlueMist ( talk) 02:15, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks, I'll add some references. MindForgedManacle ( talk) 15:38, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
Your recent addition of paraconsistent logic to Law of thought, needs references to avoid looking like original research, which could leave it vulnerable to reversal. ~~ BlueMist ( talk) 02:15, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks, I'll add some references. MindForgedManacle ( talk) 15:38, 18 April 2016 (UTC)