Hi,
I looked through the article and converted a few references to templated format. It looks to be fairly good, although a few of the refs don't meet wikipedia's policy on reliable sources, but that's a bit of a gray area. (blogs, convention websites, etc) You shouldn't have any problems with moving it to the mainspace. ff m 11:54, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
Hi. Can you join this discussion in order to offer us your thoughts? We need as many people as we can get in this, since the 4-6 participants from previous discussions on this matter was felt by some to be insufficient. It would be most appreciated. Thanks. Nightscream ( talk) 07:08, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
Hey there Millennium Cowboy, thank you for your contributions. I am a
bot, alerting you that
non-free files are
not allowed in user or talk space. I
removed some files I found on
User:Millennium Cowboy/Sandbox. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use files to your
user-space drafts or your
talk page.
Thank you, -- DASHBot ( talk) 05:01, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jason M. Burns is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jason M. Burns until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Cardiffbear88 ( talk) 17:33, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Hi,
I looked through the article and converted a few references to templated format. It looks to be fairly good, although a few of the refs don't meet wikipedia's policy on reliable sources, but that's a bit of a gray area. (blogs, convention websites, etc) You shouldn't have any problems with moving it to the mainspace. ff m 11:54, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
Hi. Can you join this discussion in order to offer us your thoughts? We need as many people as we can get in this, since the 4-6 participants from previous discussions on this matter was felt by some to be insufficient. It would be most appreciated. Thanks. Nightscream ( talk) 07:08, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
Hey there Millennium Cowboy, thank you for your contributions. I am a
bot, alerting you that
non-free files are
not allowed in user or talk space. I
removed some files I found on
User:Millennium Cowboy/Sandbox. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use files to your
user-space drafts or your
talk page.
Thank you, -- DASHBot ( talk) 05:01, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jason M. Burns is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jason M. Burns until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Cardiffbear88 ( talk) 17:33, 15 February 2020 (UTC)