|
For helping me to try to get @ Purplebackpack89: banned from Wikipedia. Jeff Huffman ( talk) 04:18, 14 July 2017 (UTC) |
Mike Brede ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Seriously, are you guys stupid? I didn't do anything wrong. Jeff and Pat didn't do anything wrong. And you blocked us? You guys are the stupidest project I ever edited. We 3 people are friends with each other on facebook and we are great editors. We didn't do anything wrong. Unblock all 3 accounts NOW. I mean it! -- Mike Brede ( talk) 05:23, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts --jpgordon 𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇 05:40, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Mike Brede ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Unblock us now. Come on Wikipedia, not even Jeff and Pat are tolerating this crap. -- Mike Brede ( talk) 15:28, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Optimist on the run ( talk) 16:30, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Talk page access revoked - go find someone else to troll. Boing! said Zebedee ( talk) 16:49, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
|
|
For helping me to try to get @ Purplebackpack89: banned from Wikipedia. Jeff Huffman ( talk) 04:18, 14 July 2017 (UTC) |
Mike Brede ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Seriously, are you guys stupid? I didn't do anything wrong. Jeff and Pat didn't do anything wrong. And you blocked us? You guys are the stupidest project I ever edited. We 3 people are friends with each other on facebook and we are great editors. We didn't do anything wrong. Unblock all 3 accounts NOW. I mean it! -- Mike Brede ( talk) 05:23, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts --jpgordon 𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇 05:40, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Mike Brede ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Unblock us now. Come on Wikipedia, not even Jeff and Pat are tolerating this crap. -- Mike Brede ( talk) 15:28, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Optimist on the run ( talk) 16:30, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Talk page access revoked - go find someone else to troll. Boing! said Zebedee ( talk) 16:49, 14 July 2017 (UTC)