Hello, Michron777, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your name on
talk pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our
help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on
my talk page or place {{Help me}}
on this page and someone will drop by to help.
Red Director (
talk)
05:09, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
You are welcome! Happy editing Red Director ( talk) 21:07, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Your Story Hour, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot ( talk) 00:14, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Hello, Michron777. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Your Story Hour".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Bkissin ( talk) 19:30, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
Hello Michron777, I saw your Teahouse post, then looked at the Your Story Hour draft and I (a non-reviewer) believe that the radio series is notable enough for a Wikipedia article. I have never had a draft article rejected, so I'm not an expert on asking for a second reviewer to look at what I've written, but I urge you to do so.
As already stated, I'm no expert on this, but I went to the pink "Submission rejected" box on top of your draft, and then clicked on the little blue "Ask for advice" box (inside the pink box) to see how things are set up. After studying what is written it appears that you need to go down to what I call the White Writing Box, and find the sentence that begins "Below this line." Begin writing below that line and politely request that your article be reviewed a second time. State that you have recently added 9 newspaper article references which you feel help to establish that the radio series, which has been continuously broadcast for 70+ years, and is now heard on 4,000 radio stations, is notable. You may wish to add that if the draft article subject is still considered to be not notable you would appreciate advice on whether you can do more to show its notability. Review your post to make sure there are no errors in what you've just written, then scroll down to the very bottom and click on the blue "Publish changes" box.
I hope that you are able to have your well-written article published. Best wishes to you. Karenthewriter ( talk) 00:06, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
Hi Michron777, I'm 78.26, and I have some experience here. I am quite familiar with "Your Story Hour" (grew up listening to it on the radio and on records). It's undoubtable notable, but honestly most of the prose needs to be re-written. The "adversiting/promotional" problems come from statements like "of Christian denominations in many countries, have benefited from these". Why is it an encyclopedia's place to say people have benefited from the program? How do you define "benefited" and maintain a WP:NPOV, one of our core policies? Anyway, I'm willing to help you with it, if you want. Try to gather as much information as you can from reliable, WP:INDEPENDENT sources. You must present the topic from an objective, dispassionate perspective, the way someone with no connection to the program, or even Christianity, might present it. As a first suggestion, perhaps some information can be found at the Adventist Archives. ( https://www.adventistarchives.org/) You'll need to be careful about what information you use, but factual information could probably be found there, beware opinions. I hope that is of some help. 03:33, 28 February 2024 (UTC) 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 03:33, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Hello, Michron777, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your name on
talk pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our
help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on
my talk page or place {{Help me}}
on this page and someone will drop by to help.
Red Director (
talk)
05:09, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
You are welcome! Happy editing Red Director ( talk) 21:07, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Your Story Hour, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot ( talk) 00:14, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Hello, Michron777. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Your Story Hour".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Bkissin ( talk) 19:30, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
Hello Michron777, I saw your Teahouse post, then looked at the Your Story Hour draft and I (a non-reviewer) believe that the radio series is notable enough for a Wikipedia article. I have never had a draft article rejected, so I'm not an expert on asking for a second reviewer to look at what I've written, but I urge you to do so.
As already stated, I'm no expert on this, but I went to the pink "Submission rejected" box on top of your draft, and then clicked on the little blue "Ask for advice" box (inside the pink box) to see how things are set up. After studying what is written it appears that you need to go down to what I call the White Writing Box, and find the sentence that begins "Below this line." Begin writing below that line and politely request that your article be reviewed a second time. State that you have recently added 9 newspaper article references which you feel help to establish that the radio series, which has been continuously broadcast for 70+ years, and is now heard on 4,000 radio stations, is notable. You may wish to add that if the draft article subject is still considered to be not notable you would appreciate advice on whether you can do more to show its notability. Review your post to make sure there are no errors in what you've just written, then scroll down to the very bottom and click on the blue "Publish changes" box.
I hope that you are able to have your well-written article published. Best wishes to you. Karenthewriter ( talk) 00:06, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
Hi Michron777, I'm 78.26, and I have some experience here. I am quite familiar with "Your Story Hour" (grew up listening to it on the radio and on records). It's undoubtable notable, but honestly most of the prose needs to be re-written. The "adversiting/promotional" problems come from statements like "of Christian denominations in many countries, have benefited from these". Why is it an encyclopedia's place to say people have benefited from the program? How do you define "benefited" and maintain a WP:NPOV, one of our core policies? Anyway, I'm willing to help you with it, if you want. Try to gather as much information as you can from reliable, WP:INDEPENDENT sources. You must present the topic from an objective, dispassionate perspective, the way someone with no connection to the program, or even Christianity, might present it. As a first suggestion, perhaps some information can be found at the Adventist Archives. ( https://www.adventistarchives.org/) You'll need to be careful about what information you use, but factual information could probably be found there, beware opinions. I hope that is of some help. 03:33, 28 February 2024 (UTC) 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 03:33, 28 February 2024 (UTC)