Welcome!
Hello, Michael.tofte, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
Katr67 (
talk)
23:04, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
I was just going to leave you a note suggesting a compromise table when I noticed your latest edit had done exactly that, and the timing made me laugh. I had also been going to highlight O'Hare International Airport as a useful article model, especially regarding what level of detail should be included. The table that you have in the article now is perfect; well done : ) Doc Tropics 00:29, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
Thank you! I agree, this table is much better, and much more appropriate for Wikipedia. -- Michael.tofte ( talk) 00:34, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
Welcome!
Hello, Michael.tofte, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
Katr67 (
talk)
23:04, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
I was just going to leave you a note suggesting a compromise table when I noticed your latest edit had done exactly that, and the timing made me laugh. I had also been going to highlight O'Hare International Airport as a useful article model, especially regarding what level of detail should be included. The table that you have in the article now is perfect; well done : ) Doc Tropics 00:29, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
Thank you! I agree, this table is much better, and much more appropriate for Wikipedia. -- Michael.tofte ( talk) 00:34, 13 February 2010 (UTC)