I see you have removed a valid reference I inserted to the Mortgage loan article, claiming it "is not a reference at all!". I'm afraid you are mistaken about that, and I have restored it. Per WP:BRD: you were Bold, I have Reverted it, and now it is time to Discuss your reasons for removing it. Please do not remove it again without discussion, either here or at the article's talk page. Whichever works best for you. Thank you :> Doc talk 22:03, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
user:mianchen Well, if I set up a website and add that exact sentence from mortgageloan.com, would you quote it as a reference? Stating a well know fact on a website doesn't make it a reference, especially when it's a commercial site built with the main purpose is to make profit from visitors. What would the readers see when they go and check out the 'reference' you added? One sentence of 'relevant' info and lots of ads...In my humble opinion, we'd either remove it, or quote it from a more credible source. It'll be interesting to find out your relationship with the site in question, if you insist that these kind of sites are where Wikipedia should source it's information from.
Anyway, I'm not going to argue with you. It would not do me any damage whatsoever whether this link is there or not. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mianchen ( talk • contribs) 16:54, January 30, 2011
Mianchen :More experience does not guarantee non-bias. I've no interest to waste my time, however your above lines did not make much logical sense. Are you trying to intimidate me? LOL. I can see why you have such an disproportional reaction. Anyway, as I said before, you have it, enjoy yourself.
Nufsay, have fun with your virtual ego Mianchen ( talk) 17:45, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
I see you have removed a valid reference I inserted to the Mortgage loan article, claiming it "is not a reference at all!". I'm afraid you are mistaken about that, and I have restored it. Per WP:BRD: you were Bold, I have Reverted it, and now it is time to Discuss your reasons for removing it. Please do not remove it again without discussion, either here or at the article's talk page. Whichever works best for you. Thank you :> Doc talk 22:03, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
user:mianchen Well, if I set up a website and add that exact sentence from mortgageloan.com, would you quote it as a reference? Stating a well know fact on a website doesn't make it a reference, especially when it's a commercial site built with the main purpose is to make profit from visitors. What would the readers see when they go and check out the 'reference' you added? One sentence of 'relevant' info and lots of ads...In my humble opinion, we'd either remove it, or quote it from a more credible source. It'll be interesting to find out your relationship with the site in question, if you insist that these kind of sites are where Wikipedia should source it's information from.
Anyway, I'm not going to argue with you. It would not do me any damage whatsoever whether this link is there or not. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mianchen ( talk • contribs) 16:54, January 30, 2011
Mianchen :More experience does not guarantee non-bias. I've no interest to waste my time, however your above lines did not make much logical sense. Are you trying to intimidate me? LOL. I can see why you have such an disproportional reaction. Anyway, as I said before, you have it, enjoy yourself.
Nufsay, have fun with your virtual ego Mianchen ( talk) 17:45, 6 February 2011 (UTC)