Please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Rorschach test images. SlimVirgin talk| contribs 16:30, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
|
Your recent edits to User:Jmh649/Suppression of content could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that this is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. diff This kind of message is not respectful, and should not be made here. It is very close to behaviour which can lead to bans. Verbal chat 21:02, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
I make no such threats. You have not read properly. Just I state the facts that the one psychological test is different for the copyright and the makers of the test, so the idea of new policy is not required. It is not my rules that copyright holders follow. I make the respectful post and you make the threat at me. Very upset. I never mean any disrespect to any peoples. I make this clear always. So I understand perhaps the free discussion is not okay, so now I should stop any more postings to American wikipedia? You will understand no requirement to fire the user who will make this resignation. I write again with respect. Mex-psych ( talk) 22:20, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
I went the courts one time and responsibility was for me to help the honored court to know that it is a harm to not keep the copyright and to provide the protection to the testing. No one had any of the threats, just informations that help. The copyright holders and the test makers made no threats or lawsuits neither, so I say it is not required to have a new policy for the psychological testing if the wikipedia has the policy to not put the copyright information on to the pages. This Rorschach information is the one different one which has no more copyright in some countries for these pictures and informations. Why make the new policy for the wikipedia for one situation of unique when all others are different? Then threat at me? Maybe I say something opposite to the ideas of what some of the peoples want? Okay maybe someone else will provide the better comment about this, if I should not, because may be I did not so good English. But I read it again what I write and I do not see the threat only the facts. But it is also gone away from there now. So I think this must be called censorship now? Mex-psych ( talk) 22:37, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
Okay, very kind persons who post here now. I will try not to help people jump. Which is a funny expression for certain! Several meanings for it! Mex-psych ( talk) 22:44, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
Please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Rorschach test images. SlimVirgin talk| contribs 16:30, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
|
Your recent edits to User:Jmh649/Suppression of content could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that this is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. diff This kind of message is not respectful, and should not be made here. It is very close to behaviour which can lead to bans. Verbal chat 21:02, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
I make no such threats. You have not read properly. Just I state the facts that the one psychological test is different for the copyright and the makers of the test, so the idea of new policy is not required. It is not my rules that copyright holders follow. I make the respectful post and you make the threat at me. Very upset. I never mean any disrespect to any peoples. I make this clear always. So I understand perhaps the free discussion is not okay, so now I should stop any more postings to American wikipedia? You will understand no requirement to fire the user who will make this resignation. I write again with respect. Mex-psych ( talk) 22:20, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
I went the courts one time and responsibility was for me to help the honored court to know that it is a harm to not keep the copyright and to provide the protection to the testing. No one had any of the threats, just informations that help. The copyright holders and the test makers made no threats or lawsuits neither, so I say it is not required to have a new policy for the psychological testing if the wikipedia has the policy to not put the copyright information on to the pages. This Rorschach information is the one different one which has no more copyright in some countries for these pictures and informations. Why make the new policy for the wikipedia for one situation of unique when all others are different? Then threat at me? Maybe I say something opposite to the ideas of what some of the peoples want? Okay maybe someone else will provide the better comment about this, if I should not, because may be I did not so good English. But I read it again what I write and I do not see the threat only the facts. But it is also gone away from there now. So I think this must be called censorship now? Mex-psych ( talk) 22:37, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
Okay, very kind persons who post here now. I will try not to help people jump. Which is a funny expression for certain! Several meanings for it! Mex-psych ( talk) 22:44, 11 August 2009 (UTC)