Your fix of my theocratical error made me laugh. I don't like the word myself. I would prefer "At 3.2 GHz the SPU obtains a peak arithmetical performance of xxx". It's not a standard usage. There's need to be some word there to indicate it's a number you'll never see in the real world. Any suggestions? "arithmetical upper bound" would be the most precise usage. On another note, I had the same difficulty quoting EIB bandwidth. I came up with instantaneous bandwidth to describe the bandwidth not limited by the address exchange mechanism. Later I found an obscure Krolak ref. where he uses the same word. He actually states that the instant. bandwidth can be obtained (briefly) peaking above 300 MB/s. The normal bandwidth figure quoted is the peak sustained streaming bandwidth. I'm not sure I used that term, it's cumbersome. It's hard work naming all the different numbers you can come up with by various methods. MaxEnt 02:01, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
Welcome!
Hello, Metageek, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!
RJFJR
22:08, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
I noticed you made some contributions to the laptop article I was wondering if you wouldn't mind reviewing my article Qosmio and posting any feedback you might have. I am particularly looking for feedback on any relevant information you think I should include or formatting issues.
Hi - in response to your post on the talk page of Kangaroo leather ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views), I replied there but am copying here for your information:
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
13:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Your fix of my theocratical error made me laugh. I don't like the word myself. I would prefer "At 3.2 GHz the SPU obtains a peak arithmetical performance of xxx". It's not a standard usage. There's need to be some word there to indicate it's a number you'll never see in the real world. Any suggestions? "arithmetical upper bound" would be the most precise usage. On another note, I had the same difficulty quoting EIB bandwidth. I came up with instantaneous bandwidth to describe the bandwidth not limited by the address exchange mechanism. Later I found an obscure Krolak ref. where he uses the same word. He actually states that the instant. bandwidth can be obtained (briefly) peaking above 300 MB/s. The normal bandwidth figure quoted is the peak sustained streaming bandwidth. I'm not sure I used that term, it's cumbersome. It's hard work naming all the different numbers you can come up with by various methods. MaxEnt 02:01, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
Welcome!
Hello, Metageek, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!
RJFJR
22:08, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
I noticed you made some contributions to the laptop article I was wondering if you wouldn't mind reviewing my article Qosmio and posting any feedback you might have. I am particularly looking for feedback on any relevant information you think I should include or formatting issues.
Hi - in response to your post on the talk page of Kangaroo leather ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views), I replied there but am copying here for your information:
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
13:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)