AfD nomination of Eurolive VP1220F
An editor has nominated Eurolive VP1220F, an article which you have created or worked on, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also " What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EUROLIVE PROFESSIONAL B1520 PRO and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to address the nominator's concerns but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you.
- Note that the following pages were also added to the same AfD:
Please stop. If you continue to
add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to
Eurolive B212XL, you may be
blocked from editing.
Empty Buffer (
talk) 07:49, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
Repost of Eurolive B212XL
A tag has been placed on
Eurolive B212XL requesting that it be
speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a
repost of material that was previously deleted following a
deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, place the template {{
hangon}} underneath the other template on the article and put a note on the page's
discussion page saying why this article should stay. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use
deletion review instead of continuing to recreate the page. Thank you.
Empty Buffer (
talk) 07:50, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
{{
unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read our
guide to appealing blocks first. -- The Anome ( talk) 13:35, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
 | An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a
sockpuppet of
Jinxerz (
talk ·
contribs ·
logs). Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful. Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth |
AfD nomination of Eurolive VP1220F
An editor has nominated Eurolive VP1220F, an article which you have created or worked on, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also " What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EUROLIVE PROFESSIONAL B1520 PRO and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to address the nominator's concerns but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you.
- Note that the following pages were also added to the same AfD:
Please stop. If you continue to
add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to
Eurolive B212XL, you may be
blocked from editing.
Empty Buffer (
talk) 07:49, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
Repost of Eurolive B212XL
A tag has been placed on
Eurolive B212XL requesting that it be
speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a
repost of material that was previously deleted following a
deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, place the template {{
hangon}} underneath the other template on the article and put a note on the page's
discussion page saying why this article should stay. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use
deletion review instead of continuing to recreate the page. Thank you.
Empty Buffer (
talk) 07:50, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
{{
unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read our
guide to appealing blocks first. -- The Anome ( talk) 13:35, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
|
| An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a
sockpuppet of
Jinxerz (
talk ·
contribs ·
logs). Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful. Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth |