|
![]() |
Hello! Merinsan,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
Onel5969 (
talk)
00:35, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
|
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Onel5969 ( talk) 13:18, 29 March 2015 (UTC)Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Ncmvocalist ( talk) 12:27, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
Merinsan, articles at Wikipedia must comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy - and in particular, avoid undue weight and unencyclopedic content, cite reliable sources in compliance with Wikipedia's reliable sources policy, and must not synthesise what is actually stated in the sources. Your recent edits at Spoorthi have failed to comply with these requirements. Please discuss your proposed edits at the talk page until a consensus is reached in relation to them there. If you continue to edit war on the article prior to a consensus being reached, your editing privileges may be revoked. Ncmvocalist ( talk) 12:36, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
Please remember to
assume good faith when dealing with other editors. Thank you.
Ncmvocalist (
talk)
12:50, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
Please stop adding unreferenced or
poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page. Content of this nature could be regarded as
defamatory and is in violation of
Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be
blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Ncmvocalist (
talk)
13:28, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
You may provide specifics on what are unreferenced and what are poorly sourced. But removing the whole thing and bulk of the article, without giving specifics is excessive. Merinsan ( talk) 13:41, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
The way you are removing bulk content from the article without giving specific justification amounts to vandalism. You are removing properly given references without justification. The same references have already been reviewed by many users and accepted as 'properly sourced'. The same references have also been accepted as 'properly sourced' on other related articles such as Airtel Super Singer Junior and Diwakar. How come you find the same references and same type of references as 'poorly sourced' in this particular article?. It looks like you are the one engaging in continued edit-warring or personal attacks. Merinsan ( talk) 13:53, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. The thread is
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Merinsan reported by User:Ncmvocalist (Result: ). Thank you.
Ncmvocalist (
talk)
15:09, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Spoorthi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spoorthi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Abecedare ( talk) 09:55, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
This is your only warning; if you
use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising again, as you did at
Spoorthi, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice.
Ncmvocalist (
talk)
15:20, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Ncmvocalist (
talk)
15:26, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Merinsan, I see you have gotten off to a rough start here and would like to help. Often times Wikipedia can be an intimidating place for newcomers for a variety of reasons. For example, we have a problem with people creating accounts to promote themselves and/or their businesses and have to act decisively. Unfortunately, good faith users such as yourself are often viewed as suspect as a result.
When you then made mistakes because of inexperience, things got out of hand quickly. If you are interested, I would be willing to mentor you going forward. I would only ask that you agree not to make any further reverts on Spoorthi (which you can't edit at the moment anyway) or related articles without my input. Let me know if you agree, ThaddeusB ( talk) 18:47, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
The Civility Barnstar | |
For your attempt to talk matters through during recent events. Ceannlann gorm ( talk) 20:47, 6 April 2015 (UTC) |
|
![]() |
Hello! Merinsan,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
Onel5969 (
talk)
00:35, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
|
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Onel5969 ( talk) 13:18, 29 March 2015 (UTC)Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Ncmvocalist ( talk) 12:27, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
Merinsan, articles at Wikipedia must comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy - and in particular, avoid undue weight and unencyclopedic content, cite reliable sources in compliance with Wikipedia's reliable sources policy, and must not synthesise what is actually stated in the sources. Your recent edits at Spoorthi have failed to comply with these requirements. Please discuss your proposed edits at the talk page until a consensus is reached in relation to them there. If you continue to edit war on the article prior to a consensus being reached, your editing privileges may be revoked. Ncmvocalist ( talk) 12:36, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
Please remember to
assume good faith when dealing with other editors. Thank you.
Ncmvocalist (
talk)
12:50, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
Please stop adding unreferenced or
poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page. Content of this nature could be regarded as
defamatory and is in violation of
Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be
blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Ncmvocalist (
talk)
13:28, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
You may provide specifics on what are unreferenced and what are poorly sourced. But removing the whole thing and bulk of the article, without giving specifics is excessive. Merinsan ( talk) 13:41, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
The way you are removing bulk content from the article without giving specific justification amounts to vandalism. You are removing properly given references without justification. The same references have already been reviewed by many users and accepted as 'properly sourced'. The same references have also been accepted as 'properly sourced' on other related articles such as Airtel Super Singer Junior and Diwakar. How come you find the same references and same type of references as 'poorly sourced' in this particular article?. It looks like you are the one engaging in continued edit-warring or personal attacks. Merinsan ( talk) 13:53, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. The thread is
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Merinsan reported by User:Ncmvocalist (Result: ). Thank you.
Ncmvocalist (
talk)
15:09, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Spoorthi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spoorthi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Abecedare ( talk) 09:55, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
This is your only warning; if you
use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising again, as you did at
Spoorthi, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice.
Ncmvocalist (
talk)
15:20, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Ncmvocalist (
talk)
15:26, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Merinsan, I see you have gotten off to a rough start here and would like to help. Often times Wikipedia can be an intimidating place for newcomers for a variety of reasons. For example, we have a problem with people creating accounts to promote themselves and/or their businesses and have to act decisively. Unfortunately, good faith users such as yourself are often viewed as suspect as a result.
When you then made mistakes because of inexperience, things got out of hand quickly. If you are interested, I would be willing to mentor you going forward. I would only ask that you agree not to make any further reverts on Spoorthi (which you can't edit at the moment anyway) or related articles without my input. Let me know if you agree, ThaddeusB ( talk) 18:47, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
The Civility Barnstar | |
For your attempt to talk matters through during recent events. Ceannlann gorm ( talk) 20:47, 6 April 2015 (UTC) |