This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 15 | ← | Archive 19 | Archive 20 | Archive 21 | Archive 22 | Archive 23 | → | Archive 25 |
Sorry for not explaining myself on my CSI (franchise) edits. Because the franchise is a broader topic than the individual shows, I don't think it makes sense for the article to be included in the individual shows' categories as well. Trivialist ( talk) 18:34, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
Pdfpdf ( talk) 11:36, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
Hello,
My reply is:
But, the page of Akon itself says since long time ago until now that Akon is a Muslim and provided a reliable source. 212.215.237.101 ( talk) 06:29, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
Dear MelbourneStar,
HAPPY NEW YEAR!!! A new year has come! How times flies! 2015 will be a new year, and it is also a chance for you to start afresh! Thank you for your contributions!
From a fellow editor,
--
Nahnah4 (
talk |
contribs |
guestbook) 09:52, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
This message promotes WikiLove. Created by Nahnah4 ( talk | contribs | guestbook). To use this template, leave {{subst:User:Nahnah4/Happy New Year}} on someone else's talk page.
MelbourneStar,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable
New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
NorthAmerica
1000 10:40, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
MelbourneStar,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable
New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
–
Davey2010
Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 12:56, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
Minecraftfan14 ( talk · contribs) didn't pay attention to your advice about un-constructive editing, they've been adding (and re-adding) unsourced, erroneous tripe and POV comments to Charlie Hebdo shooting and related pages. See this for example adding "This is the second attempt of a terrorist attack in France, and is still continuing now, with more than one hundred more to be killed." . And later this. I've warned them, about sourcing and POV, and left a personal note too. (Happy New Year!?) -- 220 of Borg 02:36, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
Great work on the Thwaites article. I posted a couple questions about dates in the talk section. Might be right up your alley. DonPMitchell ( talk) 20:49, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
I agree with the anons; the "succession box" shouldn't be there. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 17:47, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
I found it inappropriate that comments by known staunch advocates against "war on terror" are included on his death, without even a single comment from neutral or pro authors. You have to give space to both views right.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.204.79.170 ( talk) 12:15, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Yes I did mistake of not leaving "edit comment". But still strongly stand by my view that comments by strong critics Glenn Greenwald and Paul Craig Roberts must be included if and only if we include comments by neutral or other side authors. If the person who included these cares for proper unbiased presentation of information which he/she clearly doesn't, he would have included comments from all parties on his death. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.204.79.170 ( talk) 12:50, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
I tried finding out old articles to balance the views, it's difficult after more than 3 years. Probably I will give it another shot later. Anyway I totally totally admire your work for wikipedia . Please keep on doing the good work. Best wishes and regards - shyam (~Shrivas06) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.204.79.170 ( talk) 13:07, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Hi MelbourneStar, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the autopatrolled right to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the patroller right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! – Gilliam ( talk) 09:42, 26 January 2015 (UTC) – Gilliam ( talk) 09:42, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Aurora Melbourne Central, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Melbourne Central. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:00, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar | |
Thanks for the look out on my talk page. Step out to have a smoke and all holy heck breaks loose! John from Idegon ( talk) 08:44, 29 January 2015 (UTC) |
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of tallest buildings in Melbourne, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Melbourne Central. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:55, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
Not sure what went on here, but I must have hit something in error. Cheers, and thanks for cleaning up after me. -- kelapstick( bainuu) 13:39, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
{{ Law & Order: Special Victims Unit}} should not have a link to Special Victims Unit, as this is not directly related to the television show. This is like having a link to "Doctor" in a navbox for a TV show called Doctors. Per WP:BIDIRECTIONAL, if it's in the navbox, the navbox should be on the article, and I'm sure you see it would not be appropriate to have the template {{ Law & Order: Special Victims Unit}} on the Special Victims Unit article. -- Rob Sinden ( talk) 11:53, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
Every article that transcludes a given navbox should normally also be included as a link in the navbox so that the navigation is bidirectional.-- Rob Sinden ( talk) 12:07, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
should normally also be included" does not equate "definately must be included". I believe mentioning said unit is of benefit to our readers as the series is not only about the unit, but rather based and set in the unit.
You are invited to join WikiProject Hillary Clinton, a WikiProject dedicated to improving articles related to American politician Hillary Clinton. You received this invitation because of your history editing articles related to her. The WikiProject Hillary Clinton group discussion is here. If you are interested in joining, please visit the project page, and add your name to the list of participants. |
Thanks for your consideration, and please note that joining this project is in no way an endorsement of HRC or her political positions. --- Another Believer ( Talk) 14:57, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for the correction. I totally did not notice that. My mistake! - Jabrona ( talk) 09:02, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chicago (franchise), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charlie Barnett. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:56, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
Dear Melbourne Star,
Thank you for your message. If you notice, I have updated the data, based on references, in para 1 and 2 (links provided in each case). Request you to allow modification on those. The deletion on para 3 was accidental.
waiting to hear from you. thank you. 110.173.181.254 ( talk) 14:31, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
For your hard work catching and reporting vandals at WP:AIV Chris lk02 Chris Kreider 15:00, 22 May 2015 (UTC) |
Hey there,
Just today, Mark Rosewater revealed the codenames of two new Magic: The Gathering sets, "Soup" and "Salad". With this announcement, he also stated that the codename for the set "Monkeys" had been changed to "Laughs".
This can be found in the following link: http://markrosewater.tumblr.com/post/119632317253/new-codenames
As it had not already been done, I edited the article "List of Magic: The Gathering sets" to reflect this change. I made sure to include the reference, and my reason for editing the article. I believe you have made a mistake in reverting this edit, as it is factual and more recent than the current information provided by the article.
Please consider restoring this edit.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.87.64.200 ( talk • contribs)
Kindly check IICT website. Aadharcard ( talk) 06:06, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
First of all Afridi is not a former cricketer. He played a T20 International yesterday for Pakistan. He is the captain for Christ sake. So don't mislead readers. Secondly, he is not one of the greatest cricketers of all time. He is not even a Pakistani great. He is a great entertainer but has an average record. Hence, cannot be called a great in cricketing terms. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Creakylol ( talk • contribs) 09:17, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
I removed all the propaganda in there and I was in the middle to put the actual truth in there. I was just getting more information. And yes I am worried that you decided to put it back the way it was because most of it is lies. The EU does not create trade that is point number 1. There is no mention of how much the EU cost the UK. There is no mention of benefits of withdrawing. Are you trying to allow scare mongering into thinking that if the UK left the EU that it would be a natural disaster?
Have you ever heard the saying throwing good money after bad? That is the EU.
Here is a truth, The UK sends the EU £20 Billion a year although the EU sends back up to £10 Billion every year. The EU tell the UK how to spend and where to spend it, then tell the UK that you must stick up a EU flag and say thank you this was built with EU money. No this was built with UK taxpayer money!
Next lie, The EU brings £30 Billion to £90 Billion of trade every year. Politicians never make trade, trade is made on supply and demand. If everyone in the UK stopped buying German Cars like BMW, Audi and Mercedes would the EU still send them over? No, because it is the car manufacturers that send them over and they would say well we are not making any money in the UK. And if the EU created that amount of trade why does the UK have a £1.6 Trillion deficit?
Also, I personally think you can't put quotes in newspapers. The press have a way of asking loaded questions.
If you are going to put this page up then instead of painting the EU like it is the best thing on earth. Look at the Pro's to leaving and the Con's but never should one outweigh the other.
And you should be willing to take points of views from everyone.
I was going to add, the survey companies only do between 1000 and 10000 people. There is no note to that effect on their either.
I do want a reply and I will give you up to 3 days to reply.
Thankyou — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.1.136.225 ( talk) 16:30, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
hi, i'm sorry for what i did. i was just figuring out how to upload an image of her on the page but i still can't figure it out and some issues happened so i may have accidentally deleted some texts. would you mind to help me uploading a picture instead? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Monkeypupu22 ( talk • contribs) 07:49, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
hey i just made this page quoting source from http://chennaidost.com/chennai-rainbow-film-festival/ its showing warning that my page will be deletd...kindly suggest what to do. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sourabhkumar01 ( talk • contribs) 08:26, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
I would like to express my concern regarding the content that I posted which you unfortunately removed due to lack of 'resources'. I, myself am a direct descendant of Malak Ahmed Khan and I am willing to confirm this using DNA technology if my information is not 'viable' enough for your satisfaction. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yousafzai Clan ( talk • contribs) 13:04, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
This is very unfair to hide the truth from the public. People will never find his true origin where he spent his last years of his life due to your careless actions. This is unfair and cruel to the whole clan of Yousafzai and is a complete injustice to them. So please actually read this and not skim through this message. I repeat there was NO TECHNOLOGY back then so please remember this. Then how in the world am I supposed to post resources and if you reply with the exact same message, but in different words I will keep on replying so keep this in mind. I am going to fight for the TRUTH and if you have a problem with this I'm not stopping you, but I will keep on fighting for what is right. I am actually willing to send DNA of my DIRECT relation to Malik Ahmad Khan if you are so paranoid about this, so please keep this in mind.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Yousafzai Clan ( talk • contribs)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 15 | ← | Archive 19 | Archive 20 | Archive 21 | Archive 22 | Archive 23 | → | Archive 25 |
Sorry for not explaining myself on my CSI (franchise) edits. Because the franchise is a broader topic than the individual shows, I don't think it makes sense for the article to be included in the individual shows' categories as well. Trivialist ( talk) 18:34, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
Pdfpdf ( talk) 11:36, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
Hello,
My reply is:
But, the page of Akon itself says since long time ago until now that Akon is a Muslim and provided a reliable source. 212.215.237.101 ( talk) 06:29, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
Dear MelbourneStar,
HAPPY NEW YEAR!!! A new year has come! How times flies! 2015 will be a new year, and it is also a chance for you to start afresh! Thank you for your contributions!
From a fellow editor,
--
Nahnah4 (
talk |
contribs |
guestbook) 09:52, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
This message promotes WikiLove. Created by Nahnah4 ( talk | contribs | guestbook). To use this template, leave {{subst:User:Nahnah4/Happy New Year}} on someone else's talk page.
MelbourneStar,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable
New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
NorthAmerica
1000 10:40, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
MelbourneStar,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable
New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
–
Davey2010
Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 12:56, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
Minecraftfan14 ( talk · contribs) didn't pay attention to your advice about un-constructive editing, they've been adding (and re-adding) unsourced, erroneous tripe and POV comments to Charlie Hebdo shooting and related pages. See this for example adding "This is the second attempt of a terrorist attack in France, and is still continuing now, with more than one hundred more to be killed." . And later this. I've warned them, about sourcing and POV, and left a personal note too. (Happy New Year!?) -- 220 of Borg 02:36, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
Great work on the Thwaites article. I posted a couple questions about dates in the talk section. Might be right up your alley. DonPMitchell ( talk) 20:49, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
I agree with the anons; the "succession box" shouldn't be there. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 17:47, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
I found it inappropriate that comments by known staunch advocates against "war on terror" are included on his death, without even a single comment from neutral or pro authors. You have to give space to both views right.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.204.79.170 ( talk) 12:15, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Yes I did mistake of not leaving "edit comment". But still strongly stand by my view that comments by strong critics Glenn Greenwald and Paul Craig Roberts must be included if and only if we include comments by neutral or other side authors. If the person who included these cares for proper unbiased presentation of information which he/she clearly doesn't, he would have included comments from all parties on his death. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.204.79.170 ( talk) 12:50, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
I tried finding out old articles to balance the views, it's difficult after more than 3 years. Probably I will give it another shot later. Anyway I totally totally admire your work for wikipedia . Please keep on doing the good work. Best wishes and regards - shyam (~Shrivas06) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.204.79.170 ( talk) 13:07, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Hi MelbourneStar, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the autopatrolled right to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the patroller right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! – Gilliam ( talk) 09:42, 26 January 2015 (UTC) – Gilliam ( talk) 09:42, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Aurora Melbourne Central, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Melbourne Central. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:00, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar | |
Thanks for the look out on my talk page. Step out to have a smoke and all holy heck breaks loose! John from Idegon ( talk) 08:44, 29 January 2015 (UTC) |
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of tallest buildings in Melbourne, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Melbourne Central. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:55, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
Not sure what went on here, but I must have hit something in error. Cheers, and thanks for cleaning up after me. -- kelapstick( bainuu) 13:39, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
{{ Law & Order: Special Victims Unit}} should not have a link to Special Victims Unit, as this is not directly related to the television show. This is like having a link to "Doctor" in a navbox for a TV show called Doctors. Per WP:BIDIRECTIONAL, if it's in the navbox, the navbox should be on the article, and I'm sure you see it would not be appropriate to have the template {{ Law & Order: Special Victims Unit}} on the Special Victims Unit article. -- Rob Sinden ( talk) 11:53, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
Every article that transcludes a given navbox should normally also be included as a link in the navbox so that the navigation is bidirectional.-- Rob Sinden ( talk) 12:07, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
should normally also be included" does not equate "definately must be included". I believe mentioning said unit is of benefit to our readers as the series is not only about the unit, but rather based and set in the unit.
You are invited to join WikiProject Hillary Clinton, a WikiProject dedicated to improving articles related to American politician Hillary Clinton. You received this invitation because of your history editing articles related to her. The WikiProject Hillary Clinton group discussion is here. If you are interested in joining, please visit the project page, and add your name to the list of participants. |
Thanks for your consideration, and please note that joining this project is in no way an endorsement of HRC or her political positions. --- Another Believer ( Talk) 14:57, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for the correction. I totally did not notice that. My mistake! - Jabrona ( talk) 09:02, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chicago (franchise), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charlie Barnett. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:56, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
Dear Melbourne Star,
Thank you for your message. If you notice, I have updated the data, based on references, in para 1 and 2 (links provided in each case). Request you to allow modification on those. The deletion on para 3 was accidental.
waiting to hear from you. thank you. 110.173.181.254 ( talk) 14:31, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
For your hard work catching and reporting vandals at WP:AIV Chris lk02 Chris Kreider 15:00, 22 May 2015 (UTC) |
Hey there,
Just today, Mark Rosewater revealed the codenames of two new Magic: The Gathering sets, "Soup" and "Salad". With this announcement, he also stated that the codename for the set "Monkeys" had been changed to "Laughs".
This can be found in the following link: http://markrosewater.tumblr.com/post/119632317253/new-codenames
As it had not already been done, I edited the article "List of Magic: The Gathering sets" to reflect this change. I made sure to include the reference, and my reason for editing the article. I believe you have made a mistake in reverting this edit, as it is factual and more recent than the current information provided by the article.
Please consider restoring this edit.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.87.64.200 ( talk • contribs)
Kindly check IICT website. Aadharcard ( talk) 06:06, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
First of all Afridi is not a former cricketer. He played a T20 International yesterday for Pakistan. He is the captain for Christ sake. So don't mislead readers. Secondly, he is not one of the greatest cricketers of all time. He is not even a Pakistani great. He is a great entertainer but has an average record. Hence, cannot be called a great in cricketing terms. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Creakylol ( talk • contribs) 09:17, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
I removed all the propaganda in there and I was in the middle to put the actual truth in there. I was just getting more information. And yes I am worried that you decided to put it back the way it was because most of it is lies. The EU does not create trade that is point number 1. There is no mention of how much the EU cost the UK. There is no mention of benefits of withdrawing. Are you trying to allow scare mongering into thinking that if the UK left the EU that it would be a natural disaster?
Have you ever heard the saying throwing good money after bad? That is the EU.
Here is a truth, The UK sends the EU £20 Billion a year although the EU sends back up to £10 Billion every year. The EU tell the UK how to spend and where to spend it, then tell the UK that you must stick up a EU flag and say thank you this was built with EU money. No this was built with UK taxpayer money!
Next lie, The EU brings £30 Billion to £90 Billion of trade every year. Politicians never make trade, trade is made on supply and demand. If everyone in the UK stopped buying German Cars like BMW, Audi and Mercedes would the EU still send them over? No, because it is the car manufacturers that send them over and they would say well we are not making any money in the UK. And if the EU created that amount of trade why does the UK have a £1.6 Trillion deficit?
Also, I personally think you can't put quotes in newspapers. The press have a way of asking loaded questions.
If you are going to put this page up then instead of painting the EU like it is the best thing on earth. Look at the Pro's to leaving and the Con's but never should one outweigh the other.
And you should be willing to take points of views from everyone.
I was going to add, the survey companies only do between 1000 and 10000 people. There is no note to that effect on their either.
I do want a reply and I will give you up to 3 days to reply.
Thankyou — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.1.136.225 ( talk) 16:30, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
hi, i'm sorry for what i did. i was just figuring out how to upload an image of her on the page but i still can't figure it out and some issues happened so i may have accidentally deleted some texts. would you mind to help me uploading a picture instead? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Monkeypupu22 ( talk • contribs) 07:49, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
hey i just made this page quoting source from http://chennaidost.com/chennai-rainbow-film-festival/ its showing warning that my page will be deletd...kindly suggest what to do. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sourabhkumar01 ( talk • contribs) 08:26, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
I would like to express my concern regarding the content that I posted which you unfortunately removed due to lack of 'resources'. I, myself am a direct descendant of Malak Ahmed Khan and I am willing to confirm this using DNA technology if my information is not 'viable' enough for your satisfaction. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yousafzai Clan ( talk • contribs) 13:04, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
This is very unfair to hide the truth from the public. People will never find his true origin where he spent his last years of his life due to your careless actions. This is unfair and cruel to the whole clan of Yousafzai and is a complete injustice to them. So please actually read this and not skim through this message. I repeat there was NO TECHNOLOGY back then so please remember this. Then how in the world am I supposed to post resources and if you reply with the exact same message, but in different words I will keep on replying so keep this in mind. I am going to fight for the TRUTH and if you have a problem with this I'm not stopping you, but I will keep on fighting for what is right. I am actually willing to send DNA of my DIRECT relation to Malik Ahmad Khan if you are so paranoid about this, so please keep this in mind.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Yousafzai Clan ( talk • contribs)