Firstly, please note Catholics refer to ourselves as "Catholics," not "Roman" Catholics. Your "three-revert rule" is only protecting Protestants who object to us calling ourselves Catholics. We have a right to call ourselves whatever we choose, just as your denomination--if any--as the right to call yourselves what you choose. Catholics do not object to Baptists calling themselves Baptists, even though we too have been baptized. We do not object to members of the Church of Christ calling themselves such, even though we believe our church is also "in" Christ. If you have some theological objection, please present it; otherwise, admit your bias (i.e., prejudice). Thank you. For the record, I know of what I speak: I have a Master of Divinity from the University of Notre Dame.
Welcome...
Hello, Megmerrigan, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
Please
sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!
WikiCats (
talk)
07:05, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly, as you are doing at Roman Catholic Church. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. In addition, please remain civil; referring to other editors as 'heretics' is inappropriate. TSP ( talk) 16:01, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
Irrespective of the rights and wrongs of an argument (and I refer you to WP:NPOV) edit summaries must remain Civil. This edit by you included an uncivil edit summary. Please don't do that again. -- Dweller ( talk) 16:01, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
As an editor who has worked on the RCC article, I suggest you (Meg) review the debates that have gone on regarding RCC vs CC, so that you don't look like you haven't done your homework. Please review this so as to make informed contributions to WP on this matter. Thanks! The.helping.people.tick ( talk) 17:38, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
This rule is not intended to protect any particular group. It is a policy uniformly applied across Wikipedia. Please see WP:3RR. If you break it, you will probably be blocked from editing. And that's true whether you're a Catholic, Protestant, Hindu, Jew, Muslim or Jedi. -- Dweller ( talk) 18:33, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
{{
cite web}}
: Missing or empty |title=
(
help)
Firstly, please note Catholics refer to ourselves as "Catholics," not "Roman" Catholics. Your "three-revert rule" is only protecting Protestants who object to us calling ourselves Catholics. We have a right to call ourselves whatever we choose, just as your denomination--if any--as the right to call yourselves what you choose. Catholics do not object to Baptists calling themselves Baptists, even though we too have been baptized. We do not object to members of the Church of Christ calling themselves such, even though we believe our church is also "in" Christ. If you have some theological objection, please present it; otherwise, admit your bias (i.e., prejudice). Thank you. For the record, I know of what I speak: I have a Master of Divinity from the University of Notre Dame.
Welcome...
Hello, Megmerrigan, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
Please
sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!
WikiCats (
talk)
07:05, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly, as you are doing at Roman Catholic Church. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. In addition, please remain civil; referring to other editors as 'heretics' is inappropriate. TSP ( talk) 16:01, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
Irrespective of the rights and wrongs of an argument (and I refer you to WP:NPOV) edit summaries must remain Civil. This edit by you included an uncivil edit summary. Please don't do that again. -- Dweller ( talk) 16:01, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
As an editor who has worked on the RCC article, I suggest you (Meg) review the debates that have gone on regarding RCC vs CC, so that you don't look like you haven't done your homework. Please review this so as to make informed contributions to WP on this matter. Thanks! The.helping.people.tick ( talk) 17:38, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
This rule is not intended to protect any particular group. It is a policy uniformly applied across Wikipedia. Please see WP:3RR. If you break it, you will probably be blocked from editing. And that's true whether you're a Catholic, Protestant, Hindu, Jew, Muslim or Jedi. -- Dweller ( talk) 18:33, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
{{
cite web}}
: Missing or empty |title=
(
help)