This is my talk archive. If you need to contact me, please leave a message on my active talk page. |
User talk:Meegs |
2005 Nov → |
2006 Feb → |
2006 Apr → |
2006 May → |
2006 Jun → |
2006 Aug → |
2006 Oct → |
2007 Jan → |
2007 Apr → |
2009 Jun → |
---|
Hello again! The other night, a user was created, MoreronCantContributeHeOnlyErases ( talk · contribs), who was blocked indefinitely. I believe this to be the same user as we have discuss in the past ( User:Padgett22, User:Onlyslighted, ect). Though I am loathe to do it, I have decided to start compiling information for a WP:RFC at User:Moeron/RFC. Since I mention you a time or two because of past incidents, I was hoping you might be able to look over it and let me know how it looks, if you think it has validity, ect. I would really appreciate it. Cheers! -- moe.RON Let's talk | done 18:27, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
Hey Meegs. Firstly, a Happy New Year to you. The reason I write you this is to ask you a question. Regarding my recent edit on the Popular Tamil films page. I recently updated the page, adding more films to the "2006" section. You see, I compiled the information I acquired from a webiste. At first, User:Prince Godfather reverted the claiming POV. My edit had no POV whatsoever, so I reverted it back. And then, Prince Godfather reverts it back claiming that the list is copyright infringing, stating that Wikipedia may be fined if the website I enquired it from. My question is, is Prince Godfather right? I certainly dont feel that way because if that were the case, the whole article should be deleted. I eagerly await your reply. -- Hariharan91 19:45, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
A few months ago, you voted to delete a category:Military brat. It has been reintroduced and once again is being nominated for deletion. The discussion is here. I am contacting you so that you can revisit the discussion, but before doing so please read the article Military brat (U.S. subculture) as the term is not POV and is a highly researched subject. The previous discussion was done before I got involved, but I think you will find out that this is a credible subject worthy of its own category. Balloonman 22:19, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
Wow, I just checked this users contribution list and noticed that he has removed big parts and whole "Popular Culture" sections in more than 35 different pages without any kind of disscusion first. I came to you because I felt someone should talk to him, someone with autority. Thanks for taking the time to listen to me- Dark Dragon Flame | Talk 04:43, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
We reached an understanding, din't had an idea that this was being disscused at The Village Pump wich means it was discussed, sorry for being so hasty- Dark Dragon Flame 20:14, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
Sorry about posting two consecutive complain posts, but he is starting to get on my nerves, he just went and vandalised my user page, seems like he is mad. I am not interested in having anything to do with all his vandalism so I came here since it seems you already know what he does, and I am not going to write in his talk page ever again. On a sidenote the whole Goku's height issue was resolved, it was 5'7 however I admit I should have posted the reference sooner instead of going in a editwar, that's about it -peace- Dark Dragon Flame 08:41, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
Actually I just learned that he did the same to Shadowjester07, he was warned by an user but I doubt that he will listen- Dark Dragon Flame 09:01, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
I was wondering if you can look at the recent image uploads and insertions by E tac ( talk · contribs). While some of the recent images are fine (such as Image:Pyramazeband.jpg is a promo picture from here), some of the images have been labeled as screenshots or taken from such pages as MySpace.com and metalarchives.com (like Image:Edecband.jpg and Image:Lanceking1.jpg, which is tagged as promo from official site but comes from a fan blog/news site). Thank you for your time! -- moe.RON Let's talk | done 00:02, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
I recently uploaded and put a picture on Bill Hall witch you deleted. When I uploaded it i tried to put the copyright but it just came up unknown. Could you pelase explain the way to do it.-- Bigboyhiphop 08:35, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
Hi Meegs, I was just wondering whether you can request semi-protection to a article of a item that is about to be released into stores to prevent vandalism to it? I am enquiring about the article Windows Vista which is to be released on January 30th. I just need a bit of advice because I have never done this act before. Many thanks, Extranet ( Talk | Contribs) 05:06, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
long post removed
Thank you for your support on my RfA, which closed favorably this morning, and for your kind comment accompanying your !vote. I appreciate the confidence the community has placed in me and am looking forward to my new responsibilities. Please let me know if ever you have any comments or suggestions, especially as I am learning how to use the tools. Best regards, Newyorkbrad 18:06, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
Hi Meegs! Could you please take a look at this anon users contributions:- Here The you will note my message on the userpage and talk page. Regrettably the user is taking no notice and is only contributing vandalism. Would it be possible to put a long term temporary block on it for a month until I get a reply back from the Mayors Office? Richard Harvey 14:05, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
Do you think The Links, Incorporated can be a featured article? If so, or if not, how can I improve the article? Thanks. Real96 08:50, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
Hey..I got the image from the Economist...this is the URL.. http://images.google.co.in/imgres?imgurl=http://www.economist.com/images/20040605/2304WB0.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.economist.com/people/displayStory.cfm%3Fstory_id%3D2725013&h=226&w=240&sz=10&hl=en&start=16&tbnid=eHjnL_c3LV1GPM:&tbnh=104&tbnw=110&prev=/images%3Fq%3Ddeveshwar%26svnum%3D10%26hl%3Den%26safe%3Doff
if the image is freely available on google image search doesnt it mean tat its free to use? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Shreyas310 ( talk • contribs) 06:38, 30 January 2007 (UTC).
Are you familiar with the olde tyme saying "imitation is the sincerest form of flattery" ... ? -- Kralizec! ( talk) 15:36, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
I have been told you are one of the most respected fair use image decisionmakers. I am considering FAC2 on Campbell's Soup Cans. There were vocal complaints about my fair image usage. I have revised all image pages and captions and would like your opinion on my fair image usage before renominating my article. Please respond at my talk page. TonyTheTiger 18:25, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
I'm surprised to see that many of them around! They should be gone in few minutes. Regards, Jogers ( talk) 14:33, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Okay meegs I won't edit your talk page or bruce dickinson. I had no idea you had power. Please do not block me. I contribute to other pages I care about. I just thought it was funny.
But please do me the favor of not adding anything to my talk/discussion page. I did not know this would be taken so seriously and I don't want other to impune me for not knowing the consequences of what I though was a harmless joke. If you feel Bruce Dickinson is worth your protection, then go ahead. But please don't tag up my page with your feelings.
You have to admit a lot of people think this now. Steve Buscemi played him so convincingly on MadTV. What about an addition to clear up the confusion.
something like:
Trivia: Contrary to popular belief, Bruce dickison did not produce BOC's don't feear reaper in 1976. (reference needed) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.231.230.131 ( talk • contribs) February 11.
But since you hold so much sway their shouldn't I be having this conversation with you? Eventually Bruce will have produced the album. ++++ 70.231.244.149 06:16, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for your support in my request for adminship which closed successfully last night. Feel free to let me know if I can help you with something or if I have made a mistake. I would also like to encourage you to vote often (just in case you don't) on other candidates since we need more admins. Happy editing, Garion96 (talk) 00:07, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for supporting my RfA. It was successful at a unanimous 52/0/0. I hope I can live up to the kind words expressed of me there, and hope to now be more of an asset to the community with access to the tools. Please feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any suggestions for me in the future. Thanks again! VegaDark 07:26, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
I'm researching the question you asked me. I emailed the media relations person at the police's website: [3] I'll continue to look into it and try to find the policy there. Incidentally Mel Gibson has a mugshot under the exact same license, that's what gave me the impression I could use it. Quadzilla99 15:43, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
This is the email I got back from the media relations officer of the Myrtle Beach police department:
RE: Mugshots Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 07:26:28 -0500 From: "David Knipes" At this time we do not make them available on the internet because of a cost issue with being able to purchase the necessary computer software to interface. The photos are available under freedom of information, to the public. If you want some random photos let me know, I should have some stored on my computer, that I have forwarded to the press.
-----Original Message----- Sent: Saturday, February 17, 2007 10:41 AM To: David Knipes Subject: Mugshots
Are your mugshots in the public domain? I'm asking because I want to use one or two in Wikipedia. Thanks in advance reading my email.
Quadzilla99 14:29, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
RE: Mugshots Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 09:55:17 -0500 From: "David Knipes" There are no copyrights on a mug shot.
-----Original Message----- Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 9:35 AM To: David Knipes Subject: RE: Mugshots
So they're public domain then right? I have Lawrence Taylor's mugshot, which I got off the internet, and want to make sure it's not copyrighted. If it is used in Wikipedia it has to allow to allow derivative works to be created and it has to be allowed to be used commercially.
Quadzilla99 08:19, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
I'll contact him again this time by phone on Monday or Tuesday. Quadzilla99 09:09, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
Greetings, I called the Sheriff's Dept. directly about that. Officer Duhn informed me that all "mug shot" type photos from the L.A. Sheriff's dept. are public domain. I welcome you to call them yourself for verification. The numbers I would suggest you try are: Court Services Information: (323) 526-5541 and General Inquiries: (323) 526-5541. If you have any additional questions don't hesitate to ask. Cheers. ( → Netscott) 16:55, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
Hi Meegs! Just a spot of advice and your judgement needed please. the Homfirth article has been edited with a small amount of the info in it split off to form a new page Holmfirth Flood. Personally I don't feel that there is sufficient requirement to justify splitting the page. I have seen other article each larger than either of these merged together to form a single article, here its the reverse. Would you please be so kind as to take a look and advise accordingly. Richard Harvey 16:24, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
clear=all
tags that you added. Depending on a web browser's conditions, they can cause quite a bit of whitepace in the middle of the article. Without them, the one thing you need to try to avoid is using left-aligned photos before you're pretty sure that any reasonable browser will be clear of the infobox (even with a small-font and a wide-window). The layout would be easier, but maybe not as pretty, if moved the top photo out of the infobox. It, together with the map, also pushes a lot of the quick-reference stats off the bottom of the screen. ×
Meegs 17:39, 19 February 2007 (UTC)Thanks for deleting my accidentally duplicated image Image:Governor Bill White.jpg so quickly! — RP88 01:16, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
There are some of them left in Tupac Shakur's album articles. I think that the editor who put them back would respect administrator's action more than mine. Regards, Jogers ( talk) 11:35, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
Hello. You and Mike Selinker appear to have reached agreement at the CFD debate, so I closed it. My reading of it is that there is a consensus for reorganising and deleting per your nomination. I am now "pinging" you to carry out the split, please, as you offered in the nomination. At your convenience, when the category is empty, can you let me know on my talk page? - and I will delete it for you. Best regards, RobertG ♬ talk 10:59, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
Wouldn't covers in chronology be the same as having them in a discography License2Kill 21:59, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
im going to let you know that i am NOT the one doing these things. i wish to let you know that the school district is run from the high school and i am in middle school. (k that was out of wack) and that if maybe if you could PERMANENTALY soft block this ip adress so only i can edit this. thank you if you wish to continue this further please tell me what you think or w/e on MY duscussion page. -- Xana Tarantula 19:29, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
Hi there, I am a research student from the National University of Singapore and I wish to invite you to do an online survey about Wikipedia. To compensate you for your time, I am offering a reward of USD$10, either to you or as a donation to the Wikimedia Foundation. For more information, please go to the research home page. Thank you. -- WikiInquirer 01:12, 4 March 2007 (UTC) talk to me
How do I discuss it? FromtheJasonater 14:00, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
I have several proposals for fauna categories ready for review at User:Dr. Submillimeter/Sandbox. Feel free to edit the nominations as you see is appropriate. I will post these on 8 Mar 2007. (Please ignore the other items on the page.) Dr. Submillimeter 11:36, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
I submitted the merge proposal for Category:Fauna of Europe by region and its subcategories. Regardless of whether we sort animals by ecozones or continents, this merge still seemed like an appropriate step. If we decide to sort by ecozones, we can always merge Category:Fauna of Europe into Category:Fauna of the Palaearctic later. Thank you for your feedback and discussion. Dr. Submillimeter 17:54, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
The "fauna of European country" categories were all deleted. Thank you for your assistance on these categories. I have made some clean-up nominations at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2007 March 15; please go vote on the proposals.
I will probably push forward with nominations for Central American and South American animals next. I will let you know when the nominations are ready. Dr. Submillimeter 14:05, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
In yet another round of discussion, the issue of whether or not to merge animals by country into animal by continent categories is being discussed again at Category talk:Biota by country. Your commentary there would be welcome. Dr. Submillimeter 08:18, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
See Template talk:Infobox NFL player#Retired players. -- Bender235 14:04, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
This is my talk archive. If you need to contact me, please leave a message on my active talk page. |
User talk:Meegs |
2005 Nov → |
2006 Feb → |
2006 Apr → |
2006 May → |
2006 Jun → |
2006 Aug → |
2006 Oct → |
2007 Jan → |
2007 Apr → |
2009 Jun → |
---|
Hello again! The other night, a user was created, MoreronCantContributeHeOnlyErases ( talk · contribs), who was blocked indefinitely. I believe this to be the same user as we have discuss in the past ( User:Padgett22, User:Onlyslighted, ect). Though I am loathe to do it, I have decided to start compiling information for a WP:RFC at User:Moeron/RFC. Since I mention you a time or two because of past incidents, I was hoping you might be able to look over it and let me know how it looks, if you think it has validity, ect. I would really appreciate it. Cheers! -- moe.RON Let's talk | done 18:27, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
Hey Meegs. Firstly, a Happy New Year to you. The reason I write you this is to ask you a question. Regarding my recent edit on the Popular Tamil films page. I recently updated the page, adding more films to the "2006" section. You see, I compiled the information I acquired from a webiste. At first, User:Prince Godfather reverted the claiming POV. My edit had no POV whatsoever, so I reverted it back. And then, Prince Godfather reverts it back claiming that the list is copyright infringing, stating that Wikipedia may be fined if the website I enquired it from. My question is, is Prince Godfather right? I certainly dont feel that way because if that were the case, the whole article should be deleted. I eagerly await your reply. -- Hariharan91 19:45, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
A few months ago, you voted to delete a category:Military brat. It has been reintroduced and once again is being nominated for deletion. The discussion is here. I am contacting you so that you can revisit the discussion, but before doing so please read the article Military brat (U.S. subculture) as the term is not POV and is a highly researched subject. The previous discussion was done before I got involved, but I think you will find out that this is a credible subject worthy of its own category. Balloonman 22:19, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
Wow, I just checked this users contribution list and noticed that he has removed big parts and whole "Popular Culture" sections in more than 35 different pages without any kind of disscusion first. I came to you because I felt someone should talk to him, someone with autority. Thanks for taking the time to listen to me- Dark Dragon Flame | Talk 04:43, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
We reached an understanding, din't had an idea that this was being disscused at The Village Pump wich means it was discussed, sorry for being so hasty- Dark Dragon Flame 20:14, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
Sorry about posting two consecutive complain posts, but he is starting to get on my nerves, he just went and vandalised my user page, seems like he is mad. I am not interested in having anything to do with all his vandalism so I came here since it seems you already know what he does, and I am not going to write in his talk page ever again. On a sidenote the whole Goku's height issue was resolved, it was 5'7 however I admit I should have posted the reference sooner instead of going in a editwar, that's about it -peace- Dark Dragon Flame 08:41, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
Actually I just learned that he did the same to Shadowjester07, he was warned by an user but I doubt that he will listen- Dark Dragon Flame 09:01, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
I was wondering if you can look at the recent image uploads and insertions by E tac ( talk · contribs). While some of the recent images are fine (such as Image:Pyramazeband.jpg is a promo picture from here), some of the images have been labeled as screenshots or taken from such pages as MySpace.com and metalarchives.com (like Image:Edecband.jpg and Image:Lanceking1.jpg, which is tagged as promo from official site but comes from a fan blog/news site). Thank you for your time! -- moe.RON Let's talk | done 00:02, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
I recently uploaded and put a picture on Bill Hall witch you deleted. When I uploaded it i tried to put the copyright but it just came up unknown. Could you pelase explain the way to do it.-- Bigboyhiphop 08:35, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
Hi Meegs, I was just wondering whether you can request semi-protection to a article of a item that is about to be released into stores to prevent vandalism to it? I am enquiring about the article Windows Vista which is to be released on January 30th. I just need a bit of advice because I have never done this act before. Many thanks, Extranet ( Talk | Contribs) 05:06, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
long post removed
Thank you for your support on my RfA, which closed favorably this morning, and for your kind comment accompanying your !vote. I appreciate the confidence the community has placed in me and am looking forward to my new responsibilities. Please let me know if ever you have any comments or suggestions, especially as I am learning how to use the tools. Best regards, Newyorkbrad 18:06, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
Hi Meegs! Could you please take a look at this anon users contributions:- Here The you will note my message on the userpage and talk page. Regrettably the user is taking no notice and is only contributing vandalism. Would it be possible to put a long term temporary block on it for a month until I get a reply back from the Mayors Office? Richard Harvey 14:05, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
Do you think The Links, Incorporated can be a featured article? If so, or if not, how can I improve the article? Thanks. Real96 08:50, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
Hey..I got the image from the Economist...this is the URL.. http://images.google.co.in/imgres?imgurl=http://www.economist.com/images/20040605/2304WB0.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.economist.com/people/displayStory.cfm%3Fstory_id%3D2725013&h=226&w=240&sz=10&hl=en&start=16&tbnid=eHjnL_c3LV1GPM:&tbnh=104&tbnw=110&prev=/images%3Fq%3Ddeveshwar%26svnum%3D10%26hl%3Den%26safe%3Doff
if the image is freely available on google image search doesnt it mean tat its free to use? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Shreyas310 ( talk • contribs) 06:38, 30 January 2007 (UTC).
Are you familiar with the olde tyme saying "imitation is the sincerest form of flattery" ... ? -- Kralizec! ( talk) 15:36, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
I have been told you are one of the most respected fair use image decisionmakers. I am considering FAC2 on Campbell's Soup Cans. There were vocal complaints about my fair image usage. I have revised all image pages and captions and would like your opinion on my fair image usage before renominating my article. Please respond at my talk page. TonyTheTiger 18:25, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
I'm surprised to see that many of them around! They should be gone in few minutes. Regards, Jogers ( talk) 14:33, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Okay meegs I won't edit your talk page or bruce dickinson. I had no idea you had power. Please do not block me. I contribute to other pages I care about. I just thought it was funny.
But please do me the favor of not adding anything to my talk/discussion page. I did not know this would be taken so seriously and I don't want other to impune me for not knowing the consequences of what I though was a harmless joke. If you feel Bruce Dickinson is worth your protection, then go ahead. But please don't tag up my page with your feelings.
You have to admit a lot of people think this now. Steve Buscemi played him so convincingly on MadTV. What about an addition to clear up the confusion.
something like:
Trivia: Contrary to popular belief, Bruce dickison did not produce BOC's don't feear reaper in 1976. (reference needed) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.231.230.131 ( talk • contribs) February 11.
But since you hold so much sway their shouldn't I be having this conversation with you? Eventually Bruce will have produced the album. ++++ 70.231.244.149 06:16, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for your support in my request for adminship which closed successfully last night. Feel free to let me know if I can help you with something or if I have made a mistake. I would also like to encourage you to vote often (just in case you don't) on other candidates since we need more admins. Happy editing, Garion96 (talk) 00:07, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for supporting my RfA. It was successful at a unanimous 52/0/0. I hope I can live up to the kind words expressed of me there, and hope to now be more of an asset to the community with access to the tools. Please feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any suggestions for me in the future. Thanks again! VegaDark 07:26, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
I'm researching the question you asked me. I emailed the media relations person at the police's website: [3] I'll continue to look into it and try to find the policy there. Incidentally Mel Gibson has a mugshot under the exact same license, that's what gave me the impression I could use it. Quadzilla99 15:43, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
This is the email I got back from the media relations officer of the Myrtle Beach police department:
RE: Mugshots Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 07:26:28 -0500 From: "David Knipes" At this time we do not make them available on the internet because of a cost issue with being able to purchase the necessary computer software to interface. The photos are available under freedom of information, to the public. If you want some random photos let me know, I should have some stored on my computer, that I have forwarded to the press.
-----Original Message----- Sent: Saturday, February 17, 2007 10:41 AM To: David Knipes Subject: Mugshots
Are your mugshots in the public domain? I'm asking because I want to use one or two in Wikipedia. Thanks in advance reading my email.
Quadzilla99 14:29, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
RE: Mugshots Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 09:55:17 -0500 From: "David Knipes" There are no copyrights on a mug shot.
-----Original Message----- Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 9:35 AM To: David Knipes Subject: RE: Mugshots
So they're public domain then right? I have Lawrence Taylor's mugshot, which I got off the internet, and want to make sure it's not copyrighted. If it is used in Wikipedia it has to allow to allow derivative works to be created and it has to be allowed to be used commercially.
Quadzilla99 08:19, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
I'll contact him again this time by phone on Monday or Tuesday. Quadzilla99 09:09, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
Greetings, I called the Sheriff's Dept. directly about that. Officer Duhn informed me that all "mug shot" type photos from the L.A. Sheriff's dept. are public domain. I welcome you to call them yourself for verification. The numbers I would suggest you try are: Court Services Information: (323) 526-5541 and General Inquiries: (323) 526-5541. If you have any additional questions don't hesitate to ask. Cheers. ( → Netscott) 16:55, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
Hi Meegs! Just a spot of advice and your judgement needed please. the Homfirth article has been edited with a small amount of the info in it split off to form a new page Holmfirth Flood. Personally I don't feel that there is sufficient requirement to justify splitting the page. I have seen other article each larger than either of these merged together to form a single article, here its the reverse. Would you please be so kind as to take a look and advise accordingly. Richard Harvey 16:24, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
clear=all
tags that you added. Depending on a web browser's conditions, they can cause quite a bit of whitepace in the middle of the article. Without them, the one thing you need to try to avoid is using left-aligned photos before you're pretty sure that any reasonable browser will be clear of the infobox (even with a small-font and a wide-window). The layout would be easier, but maybe not as pretty, if moved the top photo out of the infobox. It, together with the map, also pushes a lot of the quick-reference stats off the bottom of the screen. ×
Meegs 17:39, 19 February 2007 (UTC)Thanks for deleting my accidentally duplicated image Image:Governor Bill White.jpg so quickly! — RP88 01:16, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
There are some of them left in Tupac Shakur's album articles. I think that the editor who put them back would respect administrator's action more than mine. Regards, Jogers ( talk) 11:35, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
Hello. You and Mike Selinker appear to have reached agreement at the CFD debate, so I closed it. My reading of it is that there is a consensus for reorganising and deleting per your nomination. I am now "pinging" you to carry out the split, please, as you offered in the nomination. At your convenience, when the category is empty, can you let me know on my talk page? - and I will delete it for you. Best regards, RobertG ♬ talk 10:59, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
Wouldn't covers in chronology be the same as having them in a discography License2Kill 21:59, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
im going to let you know that i am NOT the one doing these things. i wish to let you know that the school district is run from the high school and i am in middle school. (k that was out of wack) and that if maybe if you could PERMANENTALY soft block this ip adress so only i can edit this. thank you if you wish to continue this further please tell me what you think or w/e on MY duscussion page. -- Xana Tarantula 19:29, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
Hi there, I am a research student from the National University of Singapore and I wish to invite you to do an online survey about Wikipedia. To compensate you for your time, I am offering a reward of USD$10, either to you or as a donation to the Wikimedia Foundation. For more information, please go to the research home page. Thank you. -- WikiInquirer 01:12, 4 March 2007 (UTC) talk to me
How do I discuss it? FromtheJasonater 14:00, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
I have several proposals for fauna categories ready for review at User:Dr. Submillimeter/Sandbox. Feel free to edit the nominations as you see is appropriate. I will post these on 8 Mar 2007. (Please ignore the other items on the page.) Dr. Submillimeter 11:36, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
I submitted the merge proposal for Category:Fauna of Europe by region and its subcategories. Regardless of whether we sort animals by ecozones or continents, this merge still seemed like an appropriate step. If we decide to sort by ecozones, we can always merge Category:Fauna of Europe into Category:Fauna of the Palaearctic later. Thank you for your feedback and discussion. Dr. Submillimeter 17:54, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
The "fauna of European country" categories were all deleted. Thank you for your assistance on these categories. I have made some clean-up nominations at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2007 March 15; please go vote on the proposals.
I will probably push forward with nominations for Central American and South American animals next. I will let you know when the nominations are ready. Dr. Submillimeter 14:05, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
In yet another round of discussion, the issue of whether or not to merge animals by country into animal by continent categories is being discussed again at Category talk:Biota by country. Your commentary there would be welcome. Dr. Submillimeter 08:18, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
See Template talk:Infobox NFL player#Retired players. -- Bender235 14:04, 27 March 2007 (UTC)