![]() |
User talk:Meegs |
2005 Nov → |
2006 Feb → |
2006 Apr → |
2006 May → |
2006 Jun → |
2006 Aug → |
2006 Oct → |
2007 Jan → |
2007 Apr → |
2009 Jun → |
---|
Hi Meegs, I got your message about Someday, Somehow. I'll add a standard AfD tag. - Reaverdrop ( talk/ nl/ wp:space) 01:36, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
From his talk page I can see that you have dealt with him on this topic before. In the Haditha killings article talk page he made the following comment to another user which I think is clearly uncivil and in the spirit of Wikipedia:
There is no reason for this kind of language on a talk page of an article. I've already posted the incident on AN/I.-- Jersey Devil 07:42, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
Meegs, thanks for the polite heads-up! Reding 20:55, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
I noticed you've added deletion tags to a lot of sports card images uploaded by User:Alexsautographs. I don't see these images listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion, though. Am I just missing them there, or should I add them? — Bkell ( talk) 21:56, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
I'm sure that's what I meant. Probably worth restating your support for this plan.-- Mike Selinker 06:42, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
Hi Meegs! OS is the shortened version of 'Ordnance Survey' which I have now worked out, from readng the tiny print on the map, is effectively Crown Copyright. So I still don't know if it can be retained on site as there are many other crown copyright images on Wikipedia. The image covers only 20% section of the map and does not show all the pertinent information related to markers or symbols used etc. Plus it dates from 1972, well before the 1984 boundary Commision changes, etc. I have no objection to it being deleted after the discussion has ended, as I noted in the initial upload info. Richard Harvey 09:37, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for unlinking the solitary year at Michael Kiske. You may wish to make use of a 'Dates' tab in edit mode that will help with unlinking unnecessary date links. Simply copy the entire contents of User:Bobblewik/monobook.js to your own monobook. Then follow the instructions in your monobook to clear the cache (i.e. press Ctrl-Shift-R in Firefox, or Ctrl-F5 in IE) before it will work. It also provides a 'Units' tab. If you know what you are doing, you can copy and modify the subfiles as you wish. I just thought you might be interested. Regards. bobblewik 19:55, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
Hi Meegs!, Could you please delete an image I have accidentally uploaded twice ie: Image:20060605222847!Brockholes, Huddersfield Rail Station.jpg
Also I have a query relating to it:-
On the 22nd of April I originally uploaded the image as Image:Brockholes, Huddersfield Rail Station.jpg and placed it on my watchlist. On the 5th of June it was overwritten with a different image by another user. It did not register on my watchlist that my image had been edited, and having checked the users contributions it does not show there that he has edited the image on that date. I went to re-upload my original image, as the other user had replaced it with a picture of the former station masters house which is now private and therefore not part of the rail station, thereby ending up creating the duplicate. So how come the other user was able to override my image without it showing on my watchlist or his contributions? Also could you delete the other users image as it is of a private home and may fall foul of the privacy laws on photography. Richard Harvey 16:38, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
![]() |
Dear Meegs/Archive 5, thanks so much for your support during my recent successful request for adminship. I really appreciate it, especially coming from an experienced admin as yourself. Let me know if I'm doing something I shouldn't as an admin! Take care -- Samir धर्म 05:55, 15 June 2006 (UTC) |
It's good to be able to spend more time here, especially on WP:AFC. Thanks for the warm welcome back. :) -- ShinmaWa( talk) 15:21, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for the double heads up re the above. My word, now I am aware it seems there are prob tens of thousands of articles that breach fair use copyright! What is the best course of action to your mind? Is it serious enough that I should act when happening upon each one or could the interpretation of the law be read in more than one way? Regardless thank you for letting me know. Re Cynicalme, yes you def have a point. I have made our position clear (yet fairly I believe) on his talk page - I "gulp" (is "doubt" the word I'm best to use here?) we will have probs now, but will keep a close eye (let me know of course if you see more use in this manner). I thank you again, - Glen Stoll ery 13:23, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
Meegs, I was the admin who ended up deleted a bunch of those images from User:Alexsautographs. I've noticed that User:BurmaShaver has been doing the same and have already told him to stop. Is there any other links you can add? -- Ricky81682 ( talk) 06:13, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
re: Baseball card images
HI: I just received your message. Perhaps you have not seen User:Ricky81682's later responses to me. They are quoted below:
Sorry, I read your response at User talk:No Guru, and I was way too harsh with you. I do think that policy is clear now at WP:FU#Counterexamples, point 6. I'm going to hold off and wait for a response from you. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 06:08, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
I agree with your point, but it does look like (from the counterexamples link I give) that policy has cleared up. However, I'm going to look further into things and see if we can get an explicit statement, policy-wise. Now, all I did was put notices on the last three images you uploaded and I'll stop. If you want, you can revert it back to the fairuse tag or just let things go. I don't want it to seem like I'm singling you out, so if unless it's clear, I'll just let it go. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 06:36, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
Also, at the top of the page which contains WP:FU#Counterexamples, it states clearly that it is a guideline of Wikipedia, not a policy. Doesn't that mean that this guideline (or opinion) has not been totally accepted or agreed upon? It seems that not all administrators can agree on this gray area, and therefore should not be taking such drastic action as deleting the images in question.
Thanks for your time. BurmaShaver 22:30, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
Hey Meegs, just wondered if you'd noticed any improvement in CynicalMe's VP usage at all? I haven't had a chance to look but he sounded sincere in his reply. Thanks again, - Glen 08:08, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
Meegs Hi, regarding the OS image I uploaded for the talk page Image:P6090104_Black_Hill_Holme_Moss.JPG. It does not seem to be required after all, could you please delete it as per original info? Richard Harvey 22:16, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
Meegs Hi, Just a quick heads up. I've advised User_talk:Yorkshire_Phoenix_(194.203.110.127) to contact you for advice, as an admin. He's a new user and seems to have a problem with a user 84.9.194.111 contributions list here, who is following him around and vandalising his edits (possible edit war), and his user page. See here for an example. In the course of looking at the vandals edits I noted the article on Rage_Software which I think could probably do with deleting as it seems more appropriate to the tabloid press backpages than wikipedia, though thats only my opinion. Thanks Richard Harvey 12:22, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
As you can see from [2], User:Irate is using his dynamic IP address to circumvent his ban and is targetting user pages and associated templates and categories for vandalism and personal attacks. He is never prepared to post anything constructive on a discussion page. How should we proceed? Yorkshire Phoenix 10:58, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
I'm trying to stay out of the issue at the moment. Fundamentally though, yes, edits such as the one you highlight are unacceptable, but there seems little we can do about them, since they count as "content disputes" and there is no good mechanism for content arbritration. Morwen - Talk 11:18, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
Hi Meegs,
I just wanted to check that my opinion on the St. Hilda's College disambig is correct - it shouldn't redirect to St. Hilda's because that brings up links to things that aren't St. Hilda's College. User:WikiCats is arguing at Talk:St. Hilda's College that it should be a redirect. Cheers — SteveRwanda 12:56, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
Hi, I am seeking your advice as a mod. A user, by tag Esprit15d has done some huge (and not necessarily warranted) pruning in the List of ethnic slurs ... I'm strongly tempted to roll back everything, but feel I'd better check out with somebody who knows wikipedian policies better than I do. I notice that, at some time during the last 10 days, the article was placed under partial protection, but since said user is already well established (even if a relative noob by some standards), that would not apply to his changes. So, was that removal of "non English" slur terms warranted? What is to be done? Yours truly -- Svartalf 18:27, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
Ooops... thanks for the comment. I did feel that his pruning was rather drastic and heavy handed, not to mention subjective. Plus, this guy seems overly edit happy, favoring quantity over quality, which I admit has a gift for irritating me. I've seen too many perfectly good articles made poorer by edits that were not well enough thought out and enough editors made careless by the simple power they get from the wiki principle to look favorably on somebody tackling what IS a major editing of a big article without a minimum of consensus on the matter. Yours truly -- Svartalf 22:18, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
Oops! Point taken, but I think you understood my intention? (No reply required). 82.30.72.134 20:38, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
Hi Meegs, If you are like myself, I'm sure you get ready to scream everytime you see the Traditional Counties link!
Please don't fret, I'm very much against the whole advocation of this system!... I'm writing to yourself as I noticed you take an interest in this field.
I've made what I feel is a very valid point on the Historic counties of England talk page, about the actual use of the term "Traditional" in the title, and have proposed a change to a more academic and neutral "Historic" counties of England.
It'd be great if we could borrow you for a short time to read the proposals and discussion on this talk page, and in turn have your input and feedback!
Thank you very much for your time, efforts and contributions thus far, I have noticed them and they are truly excellent! Please keep up the good work! Jhamez84 21:10, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
Thanks - I missed the infobox! Dlyons493 Talk 04:51, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
Meegs Hi! Could you please delete Image:Rivington Res Aerial.gif ? I uploaded it today in error, it is too big a file size, taking too long to upload to the article. I have replaced it with another, smaller one. Richard Harvey 10:57, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
Yay, someone is using this besides me, "if you build it, they will come" I guess :). Please take a look at this project page and see if I missed anything obvious if you have a min. Thanks! — xaosflux Talk 05:21, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
If there's one thing I can't resist, it's a good single-letter change puzzle. I've probably written 50 of them over the years.-- Mike Selinker 07:41, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
I picked your name at random out of the list, (in the middle of the middle of M's and saw you were recently active). I'm having a few problems with either one user, or several, or who knows, but in regard to referring to some sort of prejudice or bias on my part; i.e. that I have some sort of agenda. If you wouldn't mind, could you look over my shoulder if you have the time? If not, would you mind asking any admin at your discression to do so please? I'd appreciate it. I've marked this message for watch and would appreciate any replies here. Thanks. Ste4k 00:56, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
That avenue is certainly open to you. I am merely offering a practical alternative. Warnings, as they are on Wikipedia, often come-off as condescending or aggressive; some editors (not you) even relish these effects and use them out as scarlet letters on talk pages. In any case, NPA and AGF reminders are much less effective coming from the target than from a neutral party. This isn't policy, it's just my own advice: ignore the personal jabs, stay focused on the issues, and, in the process, show that you're better than them. × Meegs 19:33, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
Hi! I visited your page following our recent discussion, and came across the idea of Eventualism. As someone else said, finally a faction I can join! My whole program with the JEL classification codes is motivated by eventualism, but like the guy in Moliere, I didn't know it until now. Thanks again for your help on the mechanics of CfD JQ 00:35, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
Meegs Hi! Could you please delete the above image which I took and uploaded. I messed up! It is of the wrong place. Many thanks. Richard Harvey 16:25, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
Does anyone really care that if i use that image? Dermo69
I apologize for the instruction creep. Can you do the revised Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Templates next? Kickaha Ota 22:13, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed you reverted my edit that says usernames should be credited in the edit summary. But the thing is user accounts shouldn't be making requests as the procedure is for IP users only.
When user accounts do create a request I give the following template:
Maybe every user account that requests an article should be informed via their talk page too, but if we create user account created requests the user won't know how to create an article which I feel is a shame.
I've haven't removed it, but would just like your thoughts on this.-- Andeh 22:19, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
Meegs Hi! Well spotted for the e-mail address. I have already responded to him and noted is E-m address. so if you want to irretrievably remove the address please do so. I don't thing he realised he could have activated my e-mail address via the link. Mind you it is a Ministry of Defense address so it has some pretty heavy anti-spam controls on it . Richard Harvey 15:24, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
Hi could you take a look at User talk:206.191.69.149 page I've just done a second warning with a short space of time on a vandalism spree, I think the IP needs blocking but I can't do it. Ta. Richard Harvey 02:06, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
thanks for your help with the copyright symbols and tagging pictures. -Brandon
I posted a question on my talk page. -- MP123 04:24, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
![]() |
User talk:Meegs |
2005 Nov → |
2006 Feb → |
2006 Apr → |
2006 May → |
2006 Jun → |
2006 Aug → |
2006 Oct → |
2007 Jan → |
2007 Apr → |
2009 Jun → |
---|
Hi Meegs, I got your message about Someday, Somehow. I'll add a standard AfD tag. - Reaverdrop ( talk/ nl/ wp:space) 01:36, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
From his talk page I can see that you have dealt with him on this topic before. In the Haditha killings article talk page he made the following comment to another user which I think is clearly uncivil and in the spirit of Wikipedia:
There is no reason for this kind of language on a talk page of an article. I've already posted the incident on AN/I.-- Jersey Devil 07:42, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
Meegs, thanks for the polite heads-up! Reding 20:55, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
I noticed you've added deletion tags to a lot of sports card images uploaded by User:Alexsautographs. I don't see these images listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion, though. Am I just missing them there, or should I add them? — Bkell ( talk) 21:56, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
I'm sure that's what I meant. Probably worth restating your support for this plan.-- Mike Selinker 06:42, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
Hi Meegs! OS is the shortened version of 'Ordnance Survey' which I have now worked out, from readng the tiny print on the map, is effectively Crown Copyright. So I still don't know if it can be retained on site as there are many other crown copyright images on Wikipedia. The image covers only 20% section of the map and does not show all the pertinent information related to markers or symbols used etc. Plus it dates from 1972, well before the 1984 boundary Commision changes, etc. I have no objection to it being deleted after the discussion has ended, as I noted in the initial upload info. Richard Harvey 09:37, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for unlinking the solitary year at Michael Kiske. You may wish to make use of a 'Dates' tab in edit mode that will help with unlinking unnecessary date links. Simply copy the entire contents of User:Bobblewik/monobook.js to your own monobook. Then follow the instructions in your monobook to clear the cache (i.e. press Ctrl-Shift-R in Firefox, or Ctrl-F5 in IE) before it will work. It also provides a 'Units' tab. If you know what you are doing, you can copy and modify the subfiles as you wish. I just thought you might be interested. Regards. bobblewik 19:55, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
Hi Meegs!, Could you please delete an image I have accidentally uploaded twice ie: Image:20060605222847!Brockholes, Huddersfield Rail Station.jpg
Also I have a query relating to it:-
On the 22nd of April I originally uploaded the image as Image:Brockholes, Huddersfield Rail Station.jpg and placed it on my watchlist. On the 5th of June it was overwritten with a different image by another user. It did not register on my watchlist that my image had been edited, and having checked the users contributions it does not show there that he has edited the image on that date. I went to re-upload my original image, as the other user had replaced it with a picture of the former station masters house which is now private and therefore not part of the rail station, thereby ending up creating the duplicate. So how come the other user was able to override my image without it showing on my watchlist or his contributions? Also could you delete the other users image as it is of a private home and may fall foul of the privacy laws on photography. Richard Harvey 16:38, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
![]() |
Dear Meegs/Archive 5, thanks so much for your support during my recent successful request for adminship. I really appreciate it, especially coming from an experienced admin as yourself. Let me know if I'm doing something I shouldn't as an admin! Take care -- Samir धर्म 05:55, 15 June 2006 (UTC) |
It's good to be able to spend more time here, especially on WP:AFC. Thanks for the warm welcome back. :) -- ShinmaWa( talk) 15:21, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for the double heads up re the above. My word, now I am aware it seems there are prob tens of thousands of articles that breach fair use copyright! What is the best course of action to your mind? Is it serious enough that I should act when happening upon each one or could the interpretation of the law be read in more than one way? Regardless thank you for letting me know. Re Cynicalme, yes you def have a point. I have made our position clear (yet fairly I believe) on his talk page - I "gulp" (is "doubt" the word I'm best to use here?) we will have probs now, but will keep a close eye (let me know of course if you see more use in this manner). I thank you again, - Glen Stoll ery 13:23, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
Meegs, I was the admin who ended up deleted a bunch of those images from User:Alexsautographs. I've noticed that User:BurmaShaver has been doing the same and have already told him to stop. Is there any other links you can add? -- Ricky81682 ( talk) 06:13, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
re: Baseball card images
HI: I just received your message. Perhaps you have not seen User:Ricky81682's later responses to me. They are quoted below:
Sorry, I read your response at User talk:No Guru, and I was way too harsh with you. I do think that policy is clear now at WP:FU#Counterexamples, point 6. I'm going to hold off and wait for a response from you. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 06:08, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
I agree with your point, but it does look like (from the counterexamples link I give) that policy has cleared up. However, I'm going to look further into things and see if we can get an explicit statement, policy-wise. Now, all I did was put notices on the last three images you uploaded and I'll stop. If you want, you can revert it back to the fairuse tag or just let things go. I don't want it to seem like I'm singling you out, so if unless it's clear, I'll just let it go. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 06:36, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
Also, at the top of the page which contains WP:FU#Counterexamples, it states clearly that it is a guideline of Wikipedia, not a policy. Doesn't that mean that this guideline (or opinion) has not been totally accepted or agreed upon? It seems that not all administrators can agree on this gray area, and therefore should not be taking such drastic action as deleting the images in question.
Thanks for your time. BurmaShaver 22:30, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
Hey Meegs, just wondered if you'd noticed any improvement in CynicalMe's VP usage at all? I haven't had a chance to look but he sounded sincere in his reply. Thanks again, - Glen 08:08, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
Meegs Hi, regarding the OS image I uploaded for the talk page Image:P6090104_Black_Hill_Holme_Moss.JPG. It does not seem to be required after all, could you please delete it as per original info? Richard Harvey 22:16, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
Meegs Hi, Just a quick heads up. I've advised User_talk:Yorkshire_Phoenix_(194.203.110.127) to contact you for advice, as an admin. He's a new user and seems to have a problem with a user 84.9.194.111 contributions list here, who is following him around and vandalising his edits (possible edit war), and his user page. See here for an example. In the course of looking at the vandals edits I noted the article on Rage_Software which I think could probably do with deleting as it seems more appropriate to the tabloid press backpages than wikipedia, though thats only my opinion. Thanks Richard Harvey 12:22, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
As you can see from [2], User:Irate is using his dynamic IP address to circumvent his ban and is targetting user pages and associated templates and categories for vandalism and personal attacks. He is never prepared to post anything constructive on a discussion page. How should we proceed? Yorkshire Phoenix 10:58, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
I'm trying to stay out of the issue at the moment. Fundamentally though, yes, edits such as the one you highlight are unacceptable, but there seems little we can do about them, since they count as "content disputes" and there is no good mechanism for content arbritration. Morwen - Talk 11:18, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
Hi Meegs,
I just wanted to check that my opinion on the St. Hilda's College disambig is correct - it shouldn't redirect to St. Hilda's because that brings up links to things that aren't St. Hilda's College. User:WikiCats is arguing at Talk:St. Hilda's College that it should be a redirect. Cheers — SteveRwanda 12:56, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
Hi, I am seeking your advice as a mod. A user, by tag Esprit15d has done some huge (and not necessarily warranted) pruning in the List of ethnic slurs ... I'm strongly tempted to roll back everything, but feel I'd better check out with somebody who knows wikipedian policies better than I do. I notice that, at some time during the last 10 days, the article was placed under partial protection, but since said user is already well established (even if a relative noob by some standards), that would not apply to his changes. So, was that removal of "non English" slur terms warranted? What is to be done? Yours truly -- Svartalf 18:27, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
Ooops... thanks for the comment. I did feel that his pruning was rather drastic and heavy handed, not to mention subjective. Plus, this guy seems overly edit happy, favoring quantity over quality, which I admit has a gift for irritating me. I've seen too many perfectly good articles made poorer by edits that were not well enough thought out and enough editors made careless by the simple power they get from the wiki principle to look favorably on somebody tackling what IS a major editing of a big article without a minimum of consensus on the matter. Yours truly -- Svartalf 22:18, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
Oops! Point taken, but I think you understood my intention? (No reply required). 82.30.72.134 20:38, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
Hi Meegs, If you are like myself, I'm sure you get ready to scream everytime you see the Traditional Counties link!
Please don't fret, I'm very much against the whole advocation of this system!... I'm writing to yourself as I noticed you take an interest in this field.
I've made what I feel is a very valid point on the Historic counties of England talk page, about the actual use of the term "Traditional" in the title, and have proposed a change to a more academic and neutral "Historic" counties of England.
It'd be great if we could borrow you for a short time to read the proposals and discussion on this talk page, and in turn have your input and feedback!
Thank you very much for your time, efforts and contributions thus far, I have noticed them and they are truly excellent! Please keep up the good work! Jhamez84 21:10, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
Thanks - I missed the infobox! Dlyons493 Talk 04:51, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
Meegs Hi! Could you please delete Image:Rivington Res Aerial.gif ? I uploaded it today in error, it is too big a file size, taking too long to upload to the article. I have replaced it with another, smaller one. Richard Harvey 10:57, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
Yay, someone is using this besides me, "if you build it, they will come" I guess :). Please take a look at this project page and see if I missed anything obvious if you have a min. Thanks! — xaosflux Talk 05:21, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
If there's one thing I can't resist, it's a good single-letter change puzzle. I've probably written 50 of them over the years.-- Mike Selinker 07:41, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
I picked your name at random out of the list, (in the middle of the middle of M's and saw you were recently active). I'm having a few problems with either one user, or several, or who knows, but in regard to referring to some sort of prejudice or bias on my part; i.e. that I have some sort of agenda. If you wouldn't mind, could you look over my shoulder if you have the time? If not, would you mind asking any admin at your discression to do so please? I'd appreciate it. I've marked this message for watch and would appreciate any replies here. Thanks. Ste4k 00:56, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
That avenue is certainly open to you. I am merely offering a practical alternative. Warnings, as they are on Wikipedia, often come-off as condescending or aggressive; some editors (not you) even relish these effects and use them out as scarlet letters on talk pages. In any case, NPA and AGF reminders are much less effective coming from the target than from a neutral party. This isn't policy, it's just my own advice: ignore the personal jabs, stay focused on the issues, and, in the process, show that you're better than them. × Meegs 19:33, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
Hi! I visited your page following our recent discussion, and came across the idea of Eventualism. As someone else said, finally a faction I can join! My whole program with the JEL classification codes is motivated by eventualism, but like the guy in Moliere, I didn't know it until now. Thanks again for your help on the mechanics of CfD JQ 00:35, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
Meegs Hi! Could you please delete the above image which I took and uploaded. I messed up! It is of the wrong place. Many thanks. Richard Harvey 16:25, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
Does anyone really care that if i use that image? Dermo69
I apologize for the instruction creep. Can you do the revised Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Templates next? Kickaha Ota 22:13, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed you reverted my edit that says usernames should be credited in the edit summary. But the thing is user accounts shouldn't be making requests as the procedure is for IP users only.
When user accounts do create a request I give the following template:
Maybe every user account that requests an article should be informed via their talk page too, but if we create user account created requests the user won't know how to create an article which I feel is a shame.
I've haven't removed it, but would just like your thoughts on this.-- Andeh 22:19, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
Meegs Hi! Well spotted for the e-mail address. I have already responded to him and noted is E-m address. so if you want to irretrievably remove the address please do so. I don't thing he realised he could have activated my e-mail address via the link. Mind you it is a Ministry of Defense address so it has some pretty heavy anti-spam controls on it . Richard Harvey 15:24, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
Hi could you take a look at User talk:206.191.69.149 page I've just done a second warning with a short space of time on a vandalism spree, I think the IP needs blocking but I can't do it. Ta. Richard Harvey 02:06, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
thanks for your help with the copyright symbols and tagging pictures. -Brandon
I posted a question on my talk page. -- MP123 04:24, 26 July 2006 (UTC)