Please stop spamming you and the rest of the meat puppets. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 21:18, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
Your addition has been removed, as it appears to have added
copyrighted material to Wikipedia without
permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read
Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be
blocked from editing. --
Fama Clamosa (
talk)
20:16, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
![]() | This account has been
blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for
sock puppetry per evidence presented at
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Medstudent213. Note that multiple accounts are
allowed, but using them for
illegitimate reasons is not. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to
make useful contributions. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may
appeal this block by adding the text {{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Rs
chen
7754
05:41, 25 February 2013 (UTC) |
Via one of the multitude of sock puppets, this user has confirmed a personal conflict of interest in editing the William C. Rader article. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 06:16, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
Hello, Medstudent213. We
welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things
you have written about on Wikipedia, you should consider our guidance on
Conflicts of interest and take a look at the
Plain and simple conflict of interest guide.
All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.
If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:
Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. -- [ UseTheCommandLine ~/ talk ] # _ 01:46, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Please stop spamming you and the rest of the meat puppets. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 21:18, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
Your addition has been removed, as it appears to have added
copyrighted material to Wikipedia without
permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read
Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be
blocked from editing. --
Fama Clamosa (
talk)
20:16, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
![]() | This account has been
blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for
sock puppetry per evidence presented at
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Medstudent213. Note that multiple accounts are
allowed, but using them for
illegitimate reasons is not. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to
make useful contributions. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may
appeal this block by adding the text {{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Rs
chen
7754
05:41, 25 February 2013 (UTC) |
Via one of the multitude of sock puppets, this user has confirmed a personal conflict of interest in editing the William C. Rader article. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 06:16, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
Hello, Medstudent213. We
welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things
you have written about on Wikipedia, you should consider our guidance on
Conflicts of interest and take a look at the
Plain and simple conflict of interest guide.
All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.
If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:
Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. -- [ UseTheCommandLine ~/ talk ] # _ 01:46, 3 April 2013 (UTC)