From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello

Hello, Mcung811. Welcome to Wikipedia. If you ever have any questions concerning Wikipedia, don't hesitate to ask me. See you around. Flyer22 23:30, 25 September 2007 (UTC) reply

Additionally, I want to let you know that a fictional character who is already listed as a relative in the Family and relationships section of another fictional character does not have to be listed again as a relative. For instance, your addition of Greenlee Smythe, Reggie Montgomery, and Lily Montgomery in Bianca's Other relatives section isn't needed and is redundant since they are already listed as her step-siblings under that very heading. If a fictional character is already listed as a lover, friend, enemy, etc. in the Family and relationships section, they don't have to be listed as that again either. But, anyway, as I stated before, contact me if you have any questions about Wikipedia. Flyer22 23:47, 25 September 2007 (UTC) reply

Supercouple article

Mcung811, the reason that Leo and Greenlee are not listed at the top of the Supercouples today section in the Supercouple article is because they are mentioned at the bottom of that section, along with other popular couples, explaining the fate of those couples. If Leo were still alive, and it seemed that he and Greenlee were more than likely to get back together again romantically, then they'd be listed at the top of that section, with its first batch of popular couples mentioned. Flyer22 02:25, 28 September 2007 (UTC) reply

Family and relationships of soap opera characters

Mcung811, we're not placing their family and relationships at the bottom of their articles anymore. That stuff belongs in their character infobox. For what I mean on this exactly, it has been discussed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Soap Operas on its talk page, as seen in this link. You can weigh in with your thoughts on this matter as well. Just remember, when talking on talk pages here at Wikipedia, to sign your user name by typing four tildes ~~~~. Flyer22 22:57, 23 October 2007 (UTC) reply

Josh Duhamel

Mcung811, there is a reason why there is a description about the Special Fan Award within the Awards and nominations section of the Josh Duhamel article. If you feel that there is any cause for disagreement, I would be more than happy to view any reliable sources that prove otherwise. From what I have found, the Special Fan Award is not an Emmy, but is an award that is chosen by fans on CBS.com and then distributed at the Emmy Awards ceremony. But if I am wrong, I would appreciate it if you would provide me with a reliable source before changing the information on the article again. Thank you! Miss Sara G 00:16, 12 November 2007 (UTC) reply

Speedy deletion of DeAnna Pappas

A tag has been placed on DeAnna Pappas requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{ hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Vianello ( talk) 07:11, 1 July 2008 (UTC) reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 13:36, 24 November 2015 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello

Hello, Mcung811. Welcome to Wikipedia. If you ever have any questions concerning Wikipedia, don't hesitate to ask me. See you around. Flyer22 23:30, 25 September 2007 (UTC) reply

Additionally, I want to let you know that a fictional character who is already listed as a relative in the Family and relationships section of another fictional character does not have to be listed again as a relative. For instance, your addition of Greenlee Smythe, Reggie Montgomery, and Lily Montgomery in Bianca's Other relatives section isn't needed and is redundant since they are already listed as her step-siblings under that very heading. If a fictional character is already listed as a lover, friend, enemy, etc. in the Family and relationships section, they don't have to be listed as that again either. But, anyway, as I stated before, contact me if you have any questions about Wikipedia. Flyer22 23:47, 25 September 2007 (UTC) reply

Supercouple article

Mcung811, the reason that Leo and Greenlee are not listed at the top of the Supercouples today section in the Supercouple article is because they are mentioned at the bottom of that section, along with other popular couples, explaining the fate of those couples. If Leo were still alive, and it seemed that he and Greenlee were more than likely to get back together again romantically, then they'd be listed at the top of that section, with its first batch of popular couples mentioned. Flyer22 02:25, 28 September 2007 (UTC) reply

Family and relationships of soap opera characters

Mcung811, we're not placing their family and relationships at the bottom of their articles anymore. That stuff belongs in their character infobox. For what I mean on this exactly, it has been discussed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Soap Operas on its talk page, as seen in this link. You can weigh in with your thoughts on this matter as well. Just remember, when talking on talk pages here at Wikipedia, to sign your user name by typing four tildes ~~~~. Flyer22 22:57, 23 October 2007 (UTC) reply

Josh Duhamel

Mcung811, there is a reason why there is a description about the Special Fan Award within the Awards and nominations section of the Josh Duhamel article. If you feel that there is any cause for disagreement, I would be more than happy to view any reliable sources that prove otherwise. From what I have found, the Special Fan Award is not an Emmy, but is an award that is chosen by fans on CBS.com and then distributed at the Emmy Awards ceremony. But if I am wrong, I would appreciate it if you would provide me with a reliable source before changing the information on the article again. Thank you! Miss Sara G 00:16, 12 November 2007 (UTC) reply

Speedy deletion of DeAnna Pappas

A tag has been placed on DeAnna Pappas requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{ hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Vianello ( talk) 07:11, 1 July 2008 (UTC) reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 13:36, 24 November 2015 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook