McGurk Johnny ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Unless somone would like to prove otherwise, I haven't double-voted in that Mfd, neither am I topic banned from interacting with that user, so that pretty much covers all potential avenues for "abuse of multiple accounts" from the 2 edits I've been allowed to make before this block. If the intention is to simply block me for being familiar with Wikipedia, please put that on the public record so I can make a formal complaint. McGurk Johnny ( talk) 19:05, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Daniel seems busy, so I will review this myself as the admin who requested the CU and discussed it with the Checkuser himself. The discussion with the blocking admin is no longer important, as this would likely now be considered a CU block, via DeltaQuad. Based on the CU results confirming this is a sockpuppet of Hackneyhound. I've also revoked talk page access due to their obviously not needing it and the rudeness below. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 20:51, 2 January 2013 (UTC))
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Please note that this user is a confirmed sock of User:Hackneyhound, as per the checkuser performed by User:DeltaQuad. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hackneyhound. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 20:08, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
McGurk Johnny ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Unless somone would like to prove otherwise, I haven't double-voted in that Mfd, neither am I topic banned from interacting with that user, so that pretty much covers all potential avenues for "abuse of multiple accounts" from the 2 edits I've been allowed to make before this block. If the intention is to simply block me for being familiar with Wikipedia, please put that on the public record so I can make a formal complaint. McGurk Johnny ( talk) 19:05, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Daniel seems busy, so I will review this myself as the admin who requested the CU and discussed it with the Checkuser himself. The discussion with the blocking admin is no longer important, as this would likely now be considered a CU block, via DeltaQuad. Based on the CU results confirming this is a sockpuppet of Hackneyhound. I've also revoked talk page access due to their obviously not needing it and the rudeness below. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 20:51, 2 January 2013 (UTC))
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Please note that this user is a confirmed sock of User:Hackneyhound, as per the checkuser performed by User:DeltaQuad. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hackneyhound. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 20:08, 2 January 2013 (UTC)