Please do not add inappropriate
external links to Wikipedia, as you did to
Nita Ambani.
Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See
the external links guideline and
spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the
nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you.
VQuakr (
talk)
06:37, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
Please stop adding inappropriate
external links to Wikipedia, as you did with
this edit to
Sania Mirza. It is considered
spamming and
Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses
nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be
blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.
Jim1138 (
talk)
07:23, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a
spam link, as you did at
Nita Ambani. Persistent spammers may have their websites
blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all
Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines.
VQuakr (
talk)
08:21, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
There have been two problems identified with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia; and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.
If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{
unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}}
at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See
Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our
username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:
{{
unblock|Your reason here}}
at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Alexf
(talk)
10:58, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
Please do not add inappropriate
external links to Wikipedia, as you did to
Nita Ambani.
Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See
the external links guideline and
spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the
nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you.
VQuakr (
talk)
06:37, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
Please stop adding inappropriate
external links to Wikipedia, as you did with
this edit to
Sania Mirza. It is considered
spamming and
Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses
nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be
blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.
Jim1138 (
talk)
07:23, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a
spam link, as you did at
Nita Ambani. Persistent spammers may have their websites
blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all
Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines.
VQuakr (
talk)
08:21, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
There have been two problems identified with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia; and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.
If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{
unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}}
at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See
Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our
username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:
{{
unblock|Your reason here}}
at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Alexf
(talk)
10:58, 16 May 2017 (UTC)