![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hello, Mazewaxie, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! RJFJR ( talk) 15:21, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar |
You are welcome my friend ! Thanks a lot for your kindness :) Dim. Nor. 86 ( talk) 20:51, 4 March 2018 (UTC) |
Hello, I'm
NinjaRobotPirate. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on
Lance Reddick, but you didn't support your changes with a
citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning
how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you!
NinjaRobotPirate (
talk) 03:08, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Mazewaxie. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Sorry the series is on my watchlist and I must have clicked the rollback button by mistake. I appreciate you asking and not edit warring. Happy editing. Jhenderson 777 17:45, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
Hi there. Many thanks for your edit of adding updated sources to the opening paragraph of the "Lost" article. Coincidentally, very shortly after your updated revision I myself attempted to add a large update with several cited sources for that specific area but as I submitted the changes I was told it would not publish due to an edit conflict since you had made your changes during the middle of mine.
I'm honestly not even sure my sources were formatted the right way as my only guess was to use the "Cite your sources" button to insert the Cite error: There are <ref>
tags on this page without content in them (see the
help page). before and after each newly linked article, though I have no idea if that was the correct method or not. In any case, you seem to be much more of an expert as citing and adding sources than I am, so I was hoping you could also add in my newly found sources in addition to your existing ones. I'd also suggest the sentence that appears before the linked sources also be updated to include audiences response as you can see from my first linked source below that the article itself is sourced by viewer ratings from Metacritic. So here's the updated new opening sentence below followed by all the linked sources. Hope you can help, many thanks.
"Lost is widely regarded by both critics and audiences as one of the greatest television series of all time."
https://www.insider.com/best-tv-shows-of-all-time-2017-11
https://comicbook.com/2017/05/23/was-lost-the-best-show-ever-/
http://www.tv.com/shows/lost/community/post/why-lost-is-the-greatest-tv-show-ever-made-1400879983/
https://www.buzzfeed.com/rachmucha/9-reasons-why-lost-is-the-best-tv-show-ever-19pie
https://whatculture.com/tv/100-reasons-why-lost-is-the-greatest-tv-show-of-all-time
http://persephonemagazine.com/2012/03/lost-is-the-best-show-ever/
https://www.realitybite.com/articles/10-reasons-lost-is-still-the-greatest-tv-show-of-all-time
151.231.178.51 ( talk) 17:17, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
References
- Can you assist with repeated troll offender on "Lost - The End" page?
There's a pathetic moron troll "A Thousand Doors" who's been reverting factually superior edits on that page and replacing them with endless garbage nonsense over and over. He's obviously a no-life loser dickhead who has some pathetic, crybaby vendetta against the show and he just got one of his fellow prick troll users to ban ME from the page when it should have been the EXACT OPPOSITE.
You seem to be very knowledgeable of the ins and outs of Wikipedia when it comes to stuff like protecting pages, reporting trolls, etc. So can you either put a permanent end to this ridiculous idiot yourself or inform someone who can? Thanks SNF-87 ( talk) 20:32, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
There is currently an ongoing discussion about the use of this site in the article. Please discuss there before adding. ★Trekker ( talk) 13:38, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
Plot descriptions cannot be copied from other sources, including official sources and IMDb, unless these can be verified to be public domain or licensed compatibly with Wikipedia. They must be written in original language to comply with Wikipedia's copyright policy. — Diannaa 🍁 ( talk) 20:05, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Hello Mazewaxie. Wikipedia's licensing requires that attribution be given to all users involved in creating and altering the content of a page. WP:CCW When you merged Special effects of The Lord of the Rings film series and Production design of The Lord of the Rings film series into Production of The Lord of the Rings film series ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) you did not provide the required attribution, and you requested deletion of the original articles. In this instance, I have provided the required attribution and undeleted the pages. If you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 06:39, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
If you are gonna revert edit without even writing an edit summary and checking the talk page, of course one can think that you may be a sockpuppet. Write edit summaries please. Sebastian James what's the T? 19:05, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
Ti ho chiamato sockpuppet perché non hai scritto un riassunto di modifica e hai modificato la pagina mentre era discussa nella pagina di discussione. Pensavo fossi un sockpuppet. Mi dispiace per eventuali errori. Il mio italiano non è eccezionale. Sebastian James what's the T? 17:19, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
"As of" statements should not be updated simply because time has passed. They are meant to designated when the statement was true. For example in Minecraft, As of May 2019, there were x number of accounts is specifically tied to the fact that the figure was released in May. It should not be changed to "June 2019" because we are now in June. Minecraft undoubtably has more accounts now than it did in May, so updating it to say June would fail WP:V. -- ferret ( talk) 17:53, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
Toy Story 4 is just revealed to be the final installment in the series, most of the creators: John Lasseter and Lee Unkrick have left the studio for good, most of the voice actors have aged and some have died. They speculated that a Toy Story 5 may be made, but that's not true! Pixar won't ever make sequels again for so many years. So not everything from these magazines is true. Please rename it back to final installment. If a Toy Story 5 is made, it won't be great or good as the predecessor, so it's not worth it. WP:V. -- talk ( talk) 17:53, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
Okay, but why don't they confirm it's the final? Maybe because they want to made another Toy Story film after more than a decade to generate more cash? They were confusing us. We don't need to see another sequel, there are plenty of sequels from other titles in 2020s.
Oh, i'm sure they will say sometime that this film is the last. We should search on TVTropes for that or wait 10 years of so. I've also got disgusted by the fact that they didn't even made a videogame based on that movie.
Hello, I'm
Gareth Griffith-Jones. I want to let you know that
your recent reverting has been undone because it is not constructive.
Gareth Griffith-Jones (
contribs) (
talk) 11:00, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
The templates are redundant in general, their original purpose was to list the name of the right-of-way. See Clark/Lake station for an example of this. Note that I am just continuing an ongoing template cleanup, the line parameters have already been removed in New York, Pennsylvania, and various other cities along Amtrak lines. Cards84664 (talk) 15:32, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
Hi there! Could you guide me in reviewing a page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tpp1111 ( talk • contribs) 10:04, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello Mazewaxie. I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of Eternals (2020 film), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: I tagged it for history merge instead. . Thank you. Masum Reza 📞 15:23, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
Hi there. First of all, thanks for your edits on the MCU page. I saw you removed the Average row on the Critical & Public response section. Just wondering what your motivation for this removal is. I think this is something there should be consensus for, so I will go ahead and restore it. If you still disagree, let's put it up for vote on the Talk-page. Cheers! SassyCollins ( talk) 07:31, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
Check. Very useful insight. I'm inclined to agree. Will remove. SassyCollins ( talk) 10:11, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Crimson Dynamo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Whiplash ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 07:47, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
@ Mazewaxie: You thanked me today for my edit on that Birth of a Nation poster - would you like to review my work on the article Robert E. Lee on Traveller for GA? MagicatthemovieS ( talk) 17:14, 24 July 2019 (UTC)MagicatthemovieS
![]() |
Thanks to helping out to the disruptive IP. Sheldybett ( talk) 10:55, 25 July 2019 (UTC) |
I have some great news for you which you will be relived that the IP has been blocked by an admin. Now we have reached the of patience for him. Sheldybett ( talk) 11:42, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
I used a geolocation tool to cross reference the IP. I'm pretty sure there is one person, maybe two, that have been posting here over the course of a few months over several different IPS. But the problem is that the IP must be a dynamic IP, like from a coffee shop or computer lab, so it keeps changing. That is why it looks like one person with one edit on one article. IPS will often change from hour to hour, day to day, hence dynamic. But you can tell it is the same person. The geolocation shows a region in Texas and Southern Colorado almost every time. Though one was closer to California. So maybe a second anon. I wouldn't sweat it though. If it bothers you that much then just ask them politely to make an account to avoid confusion and have WP:GOODFAITH. Thank you for your time. FussbussSOhush ( talk) 19:38, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello! On the TX500 Wikipedia page, you reverted my correction describing the the engine as a wet sump type. Would you please tell me why you believe it as a dry sump engine?
As I understand it, a dry sump engine has an external oil tank. The TX500/XS500 does not have an external oil tank.
Regards,
Berniebee2
![]() |
The Original Barnstar | |
Good work with your edits on film articles! TropicAces ( talk) 14:52, 26 July 2019 (UTC)tropicAces |
The poster for The Irishman appears to have been published here [1] incase you can bring it into the article. Nice edits by you so far for that new film article. You might need to link manually to Whats on Netflix since they do not allow hot-linking, and then type the film name into their search box to get the poster for the Wikipedia Infobox. CodexJustin ( talk) 17:28, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
I added the reference to site to be referenced in the archive footage paragraph of the production section, where you added that citations were needed. I did this according to how the Wikipedia page on adding references stated to do it. However it didn't work, even though the article exists. Can you please look at it and either tell me where I went wrong or correct it. Thank you. Samurai Kung fu Cowboy ( talk) 19:49, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
It's reference number 60 on the list. Samurai Kung fu Cowboy ( talk) 19:50, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
Thank you! I'll look at what you did and make sure I get it right next time. Samurai Kung fu Cowboy ( talk) 20:09, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
Hello again. I noticed you applied a tag to the cast section again. Last time you did that I removed all the excessive information I could find. Personally I don't see any at this time and the tag is a little vague. There is a cast section on the talk page. I would like the tag to be removed. I also removed a template someone else had added in order to edit more easily, I was hoping to restore but I'm not sure I can with your tag there. I'm curious if you have specific concerns. Otherwise, I'm not sure what to make of it. Samurai Kung fu Cowboy ( talk) 16:12, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
I think they're all important. Most of the characters being portrayed are real life people. However, I may be in the minority. I'll remove the tag for now, but I don't know how most editors feel. You may want to bring it up in the cast section of the talk page to get more feedback. That's up to you. Thank you. Samurai Kung fu Cowboy ( talk) 16:31, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
Hello again. I'm sorry but I undid a couple of your recent minor edits because I had to in order to undo some bigger ones by another editor. I'm not quite sure of everything you did even when I look at it. I hope it's not too much of an inconvenience. Thank you. I hope you're well. Samurai Kung fu Cowboy ( talk) 12:21, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
Hello. At User talk:DoyleBrendan, you have recently welcomed a spambot, including thanking them for their contributions. You should probably examine users' edits before welcoming them. Edible Melon ( talk) 11:13, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
The page can be deleted, it was intended for the Dutch Wikipedia instead of the English.
( Jtm) 18:13, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
Short Description Barnstar | |
For your work on One Piece related pages. ★Trekker ( talk) 13:34, 13 August 2019 (UTC) |
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:The Irishman teaser poster.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot ( talk) 01:00, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:The Irishman teaser poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:45, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
Hey, I just wanted to thank you for your efforts at improving Zendaya's page. But it's mostly a losing fight with blatant WP:BRD misuse amongst a close group of friends who Wikipedia:Tag team each other. Krimuk2.0 ( talk) 09:19, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hello, Mazewaxie, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! RJFJR ( talk) 15:21, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar |
You are welcome my friend ! Thanks a lot for your kindness :) Dim. Nor. 86 ( talk) 20:51, 4 March 2018 (UTC) |
Hello, I'm
NinjaRobotPirate. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on
Lance Reddick, but you didn't support your changes with a
citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning
how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you!
NinjaRobotPirate (
talk) 03:08, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Mazewaxie. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Sorry the series is on my watchlist and I must have clicked the rollback button by mistake. I appreciate you asking and not edit warring. Happy editing. Jhenderson 777 17:45, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
Hi there. Many thanks for your edit of adding updated sources to the opening paragraph of the "Lost" article. Coincidentally, very shortly after your updated revision I myself attempted to add a large update with several cited sources for that specific area but as I submitted the changes I was told it would not publish due to an edit conflict since you had made your changes during the middle of mine.
I'm honestly not even sure my sources were formatted the right way as my only guess was to use the "Cite your sources" button to insert the Cite error: There are <ref>
tags on this page without content in them (see the
help page). before and after each newly linked article, though I have no idea if that was the correct method or not. In any case, you seem to be much more of an expert as citing and adding sources than I am, so I was hoping you could also add in my newly found sources in addition to your existing ones. I'd also suggest the sentence that appears before the linked sources also be updated to include audiences response as you can see from my first linked source below that the article itself is sourced by viewer ratings from Metacritic. So here's the updated new opening sentence below followed by all the linked sources. Hope you can help, many thanks.
"Lost is widely regarded by both critics and audiences as one of the greatest television series of all time."
https://www.insider.com/best-tv-shows-of-all-time-2017-11
https://comicbook.com/2017/05/23/was-lost-the-best-show-ever-/
http://www.tv.com/shows/lost/community/post/why-lost-is-the-greatest-tv-show-ever-made-1400879983/
https://www.buzzfeed.com/rachmucha/9-reasons-why-lost-is-the-best-tv-show-ever-19pie
https://whatculture.com/tv/100-reasons-why-lost-is-the-greatest-tv-show-of-all-time
http://persephonemagazine.com/2012/03/lost-is-the-best-show-ever/
https://www.realitybite.com/articles/10-reasons-lost-is-still-the-greatest-tv-show-of-all-time
151.231.178.51 ( talk) 17:17, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
References
- Can you assist with repeated troll offender on "Lost - The End" page?
There's a pathetic moron troll "A Thousand Doors" who's been reverting factually superior edits on that page and replacing them with endless garbage nonsense over and over. He's obviously a no-life loser dickhead who has some pathetic, crybaby vendetta against the show and he just got one of his fellow prick troll users to ban ME from the page when it should have been the EXACT OPPOSITE.
You seem to be very knowledgeable of the ins and outs of Wikipedia when it comes to stuff like protecting pages, reporting trolls, etc. So can you either put a permanent end to this ridiculous idiot yourself or inform someone who can? Thanks SNF-87 ( talk) 20:32, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
There is currently an ongoing discussion about the use of this site in the article. Please discuss there before adding. ★Trekker ( talk) 13:38, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
Plot descriptions cannot be copied from other sources, including official sources and IMDb, unless these can be verified to be public domain or licensed compatibly with Wikipedia. They must be written in original language to comply with Wikipedia's copyright policy. — Diannaa 🍁 ( talk) 20:05, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Hello Mazewaxie. Wikipedia's licensing requires that attribution be given to all users involved in creating and altering the content of a page. WP:CCW When you merged Special effects of The Lord of the Rings film series and Production design of The Lord of the Rings film series into Production of The Lord of the Rings film series ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) you did not provide the required attribution, and you requested deletion of the original articles. In this instance, I have provided the required attribution and undeleted the pages. If you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 06:39, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
If you are gonna revert edit without even writing an edit summary and checking the talk page, of course one can think that you may be a sockpuppet. Write edit summaries please. Sebastian James what's the T? 19:05, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
Ti ho chiamato sockpuppet perché non hai scritto un riassunto di modifica e hai modificato la pagina mentre era discussa nella pagina di discussione. Pensavo fossi un sockpuppet. Mi dispiace per eventuali errori. Il mio italiano non è eccezionale. Sebastian James what's the T? 17:19, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
"As of" statements should not be updated simply because time has passed. They are meant to designated when the statement was true. For example in Minecraft, As of May 2019, there were x number of accounts is specifically tied to the fact that the figure was released in May. It should not be changed to "June 2019" because we are now in June. Minecraft undoubtably has more accounts now than it did in May, so updating it to say June would fail WP:V. -- ferret ( talk) 17:53, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
Toy Story 4 is just revealed to be the final installment in the series, most of the creators: John Lasseter and Lee Unkrick have left the studio for good, most of the voice actors have aged and some have died. They speculated that a Toy Story 5 may be made, but that's not true! Pixar won't ever make sequels again for so many years. So not everything from these magazines is true. Please rename it back to final installment. If a Toy Story 5 is made, it won't be great or good as the predecessor, so it's not worth it. WP:V. -- talk ( talk) 17:53, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
Okay, but why don't they confirm it's the final? Maybe because they want to made another Toy Story film after more than a decade to generate more cash? They were confusing us. We don't need to see another sequel, there are plenty of sequels from other titles in 2020s.
Oh, i'm sure they will say sometime that this film is the last. We should search on TVTropes for that or wait 10 years of so. I've also got disgusted by the fact that they didn't even made a videogame based on that movie.
Hello, I'm
Gareth Griffith-Jones. I want to let you know that
your recent reverting has been undone because it is not constructive.
Gareth Griffith-Jones (
contribs) (
talk) 11:00, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
The templates are redundant in general, their original purpose was to list the name of the right-of-way. See Clark/Lake station for an example of this. Note that I am just continuing an ongoing template cleanup, the line parameters have already been removed in New York, Pennsylvania, and various other cities along Amtrak lines. Cards84664 (talk) 15:32, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
Hi there! Could you guide me in reviewing a page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tpp1111 ( talk • contribs) 10:04, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello Mazewaxie. I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of Eternals (2020 film), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: I tagged it for history merge instead. . Thank you. Masum Reza 📞 15:23, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
Hi there. First of all, thanks for your edits on the MCU page. I saw you removed the Average row on the Critical & Public response section. Just wondering what your motivation for this removal is. I think this is something there should be consensus for, so I will go ahead and restore it. If you still disagree, let's put it up for vote on the Talk-page. Cheers! SassyCollins ( talk) 07:31, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
Check. Very useful insight. I'm inclined to agree. Will remove. SassyCollins ( talk) 10:11, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Crimson Dynamo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Whiplash ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 07:47, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
@ Mazewaxie: You thanked me today for my edit on that Birth of a Nation poster - would you like to review my work on the article Robert E. Lee on Traveller for GA? MagicatthemovieS ( talk) 17:14, 24 July 2019 (UTC)MagicatthemovieS
![]() |
Thanks to helping out to the disruptive IP. Sheldybett ( talk) 10:55, 25 July 2019 (UTC) |
I have some great news for you which you will be relived that the IP has been blocked by an admin. Now we have reached the of patience for him. Sheldybett ( talk) 11:42, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
I used a geolocation tool to cross reference the IP. I'm pretty sure there is one person, maybe two, that have been posting here over the course of a few months over several different IPS. But the problem is that the IP must be a dynamic IP, like from a coffee shop or computer lab, so it keeps changing. That is why it looks like one person with one edit on one article. IPS will often change from hour to hour, day to day, hence dynamic. But you can tell it is the same person. The geolocation shows a region in Texas and Southern Colorado almost every time. Though one was closer to California. So maybe a second anon. I wouldn't sweat it though. If it bothers you that much then just ask them politely to make an account to avoid confusion and have WP:GOODFAITH. Thank you for your time. FussbussSOhush ( talk) 19:38, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello! On the TX500 Wikipedia page, you reverted my correction describing the the engine as a wet sump type. Would you please tell me why you believe it as a dry sump engine?
As I understand it, a dry sump engine has an external oil tank. The TX500/XS500 does not have an external oil tank.
Regards,
Berniebee2
![]() |
The Original Barnstar | |
Good work with your edits on film articles! TropicAces ( talk) 14:52, 26 July 2019 (UTC)tropicAces |
The poster for The Irishman appears to have been published here [1] incase you can bring it into the article. Nice edits by you so far for that new film article. You might need to link manually to Whats on Netflix since they do not allow hot-linking, and then type the film name into their search box to get the poster for the Wikipedia Infobox. CodexJustin ( talk) 17:28, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
I added the reference to site to be referenced in the archive footage paragraph of the production section, where you added that citations were needed. I did this according to how the Wikipedia page on adding references stated to do it. However it didn't work, even though the article exists. Can you please look at it and either tell me where I went wrong or correct it. Thank you. Samurai Kung fu Cowboy ( talk) 19:49, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
It's reference number 60 on the list. Samurai Kung fu Cowboy ( talk) 19:50, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
Thank you! I'll look at what you did and make sure I get it right next time. Samurai Kung fu Cowboy ( talk) 20:09, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
Hello again. I noticed you applied a tag to the cast section again. Last time you did that I removed all the excessive information I could find. Personally I don't see any at this time and the tag is a little vague. There is a cast section on the talk page. I would like the tag to be removed. I also removed a template someone else had added in order to edit more easily, I was hoping to restore but I'm not sure I can with your tag there. I'm curious if you have specific concerns. Otherwise, I'm not sure what to make of it. Samurai Kung fu Cowboy ( talk) 16:12, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
I think they're all important. Most of the characters being portrayed are real life people. However, I may be in the minority. I'll remove the tag for now, but I don't know how most editors feel. You may want to bring it up in the cast section of the talk page to get more feedback. That's up to you. Thank you. Samurai Kung fu Cowboy ( talk) 16:31, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
Hello again. I'm sorry but I undid a couple of your recent minor edits because I had to in order to undo some bigger ones by another editor. I'm not quite sure of everything you did even when I look at it. I hope it's not too much of an inconvenience. Thank you. I hope you're well. Samurai Kung fu Cowboy ( talk) 12:21, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
Hello. At User talk:DoyleBrendan, you have recently welcomed a spambot, including thanking them for their contributions. You should probably examine users' edits before welcoming them. Edible Melon ( talk) 11:13, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
The page can be deleted, it was intended for the Dutch Wikipedia instead of the English.
( Jtm) 18:13, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
Short Description Barnstar | |
For your work on One Piece related pages. ★Trekker ( talk) 13:34, 13 August 2019 (UTC) |
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:The Irishman teaser poster.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot ( talk) 01:00, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:The Irishman teaser poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:45, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
Hey, I just wanted to thank you for your efforts at improving Zendaya's page. But it's mostly a losing fight with blatant WP:BRD misuse amongst a close group of friends who Wikipedia:Tag team each other. Krimuk2.0 ( talk) 09:19, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |