|
At Persecution of Falun Gong, please provide explanations of what you are doing. I also would encourage you to make smaller edits, with explanations. I reverted todays edits as they seemed a complex mix of damaging, POV, and useful edits. - Sinneed 03:52, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
In this series of edits, you have added a great deal of wp:POV material.- Sinneed 04:17, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
In addition, you damaged existing sources. If you re-add, please do so in detail, and correct the damage this time.- Sinneed
You attribute opinion to news organs. While this *may* be appropriate for state papers, most of the press gives the authors of opinion articles, and it is the opinion of the authors. Attribute the opinion.- Sinneed 04:17, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
You are making citations to sources that fail wp:V... we can't see them. At least, add quote= params and give the actual quotes. Your credibility is damaged as you have used sources... but then contradicted them directly.- Sinneed 04:17, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
Finally, you are adding sources that you claim to support your POV... but then you state there are, for example 7 protesters... but the article you use says 5.- Sinneed 04:17, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a
neutral point of view. Please remember to observe this important
core policy. Thank you.
Defender of torch (
talk)
04:46, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
Kindly note the WP:AE case above has just been filed. Ohconfucius ¡digame! 05:50, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
|
At Persecution of Falun Gong, please provide explanations of what you are doing. I also would encourage you to make smaller edits, with explanations. I reverted todays edits as they seemed a complex mix of damaging, POV, and useful edits. - Sinneed 03:52, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
In this series of edits, you have added a great deal of wp:POV material.- Sinneed 04:17, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
In addition, you damaged existing sources. If you re-add, please do so in detail, and correct the damage this time.- Sinneed
You attribute opinion to news organs. While this *may* be appropriate for state papers, most of the press gives the authors of opinion articles, and it is the opinion of the authors. Attribute the opinion.- Sinneed 04:17, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
You are making citations to sources that fail wp:V... we can't see them. At least, add quote= params and give the actual quotes. Your credibility is damaged as you have used sources... but then contradicted them directly.- Sinneed 04:17, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
Finally, you are adding sources that you claim to support your POV... but then you state there are, for example 7 protesters... but the article you use says 5.- Sinneed 04:17, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a
neutral point of view. Please remember to observe this important
core policy. Thank you.
Defender of torch (
talk)
04:46, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
Kindly note the WP:AE case above has just been filed. Ohconfucius ¡digame! 05:50, 10 March 2010 (UTC)