A tag has been placed on User:Maverickcommunications, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.
If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{
hangon}}
on the top of the article and leave a note on [[Talk:User:Maverickcommunications|the article's talk page]] explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any
citations from
reliable sources to ensure that the article will be
verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
Calton |
Talk
11:32, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
I don't get this - why is info about Stella Artois connected with this? Please clarfiy this
Your original user page was blatant advertising, so I tagged it as such and left the above warning. An administrator (in this case, Edgar181 ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA)) agreed and deleted it. THAT'S IT. What, you expect Wikipedia page edits to magically vanish of their own accord?
Also, as it says at the top of my User Talk page, when you add comments to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should
sign your posts by typing four
tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. --
Calton |
Talk
13:45, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on User:Maverickcommunications, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.
If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{
hangon}}
on the top of the article and leave a note on [[Talk:User:Maverickcommunications|the article's talk page]] explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any
citations from
reliable sources to ensure that the article will be
verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
Calton |
Talk
11:32, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
I don't get this - why is info about Stella Artois connected with this? Please clarfiy this
Your original user page was blatant advertising, so I tagged it as such and left the above warning. An administrator (in this case, Edgar181 ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA)) agreed and deleted it. THAT'S IT. What, you expect Wikipedia page edits to magically vanish of their own accord?
Also, as it says at the top of my User Talk page, when you add comments to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should
sign your posts by typing four
tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. --
Calton |
Talk
13:45, 10 September 2007 (UTC)