![]() |
The Original Barnstar | |
For saving my homepage in the face of vandals thanks. St.daniel 20:57, 17 January 2007 (UTC) |
You're welcome and thanks for protecting my homepage-- St.daniel 21:23, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
Hi, if you find a userpage mistakenly created in mainspace by a new user, as with Nguyen Xuan Huy, please consider doing this:
This is a bit less WP:BITEy than simply deleting the page and often avoids problems. Also, if they continue to re-create their user page in main space (as a vanity article), the fact that it has been explained to them means we can take action without worrying that they are simply clueless. Thanks, Guy ( Help!) 12:30, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
Hi,
I would like to know why you deleted this article. Please reply as soon as possible. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Dathrilla01 ( talk • contribs) 11:48, 24 January 2007 (UTC).
I know it's a crap page, but I was having fun on this other wise dreary encyclopedia full of anally retentive users. kthxbi SchoolBoundstone 11:58, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
I hit the wrong button when saving. I have since gone back and restored it. Jvbishop 15:58, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
It would appear that you assumed the article Martin Heron was created by User:MartinHeron, which it was not -- I created it(!). Just thought I should bring this to your attention if you were using some automatic heuristics which had brought up a false positive... -- Ratarsed 13:30, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
Can you tell me how wikipedia is affected by the five digit dates. If you will check, it's only there in the articles section which I added. I am not changing anybody else's year format, unless I am changing the section also. - Samuel Pakalomattam 21/02/02007
I want to thank what you're doing on Cop Movie (reverting the AfD tags that the contributors keep removing), however you may (and I repeat, may) be violating 3RR, however I am not really completely sure about the exact rules so I'm not sure. Just letting you know, I wouldn't want you to get blocked for doing (what seems to be) the right thing. -- RazorICE talk 09:42, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
Sorry i didn't mean to start false appologies it was an accident and i didn't know what i was doing, or how to delete it. Sorry again.
Hey there. If you revert vandalism, be sure to leave a note on the user's talkpage. A list of templates can be found here. Scalene• UserPage• Talk• Contributions• Biography• Є• 05:40, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
FYI, I protected this article so it can't be recreated and Pelican was indefinitely blocked by another admin. Rlevse 01:49, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
Thanks, it is much appreciated! -- PS2pcGAMER ( talk) 12:03, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
A page you participated in creating, Zombie comedy, has been nominated for deletion. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zombie comedy for the commentary. Captain Infinity 17:44, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
Hi, you reported User:Lolfag1 to AIV because of the inappropriate username. I've indef-blocked the user in question, but for future reference, concerns about inappropriate usernames should be taken to WP:RFCN and not to AIV. Thank you. Wal ton Need some help? 19:32, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
please put back free toast it is a good page and will help wikipidia —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Will.shall.not.stop ( talk • contribs) 12:43, 1 May 2007 (UTC).
Thank you for your speedy action on Kep Enderby. It is a most frustrating problem! Gillyweed 13:25, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
If you could hang on for a few hours you would realise that we're actually providing a background in the large Welwyn Garden City based distributor - and therefore I disagree with your action on this topic. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by WelwynToolGroup ( talk • contribs) 10:33, 4 May 2007 (UTC).
hey. you know the page 'fubby' that you deleted? well, it was an in joke with justin (fubby), who helped me make it. It was not a personal attack or anything. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mercreature ( talk • contribs) 07:29, 13 May 2007 (UTC).
Just on the penisland.net page, you have no idea of the scale of this as a joke in Ireland, it is almost impossible to get through a week of school without someone trying to send you to this website, it happens the country over. I fully realise why you would consider deleting and please go ahead if you feel my reasons aren't valid. cheers Plokt
Actually just delete, it's not worth my hassle trying to argue its existence, Have my leaving cert next week which is slightly more importnat!, perhaps a list of websites containg double entendre's should be created. plokt 15:08, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
I'm sorry for the attacks made on Ten Pound Hammer. But his comment about the deletion of this article was completely unneeded. I feel that the Torrent This! (The Movie) article shouldn't be deleted, thank you. Steelersfannumber1 01:29, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
FYI, the author placed the {{ hangon}} tag in response to the {{ subst:afd}} - which attracts attention as it causes the page to appear in CAT:CSD and CAT:CCSD. Since the author added this, it's presumbed to be {{ db-author}}. The "dontdelete" tag came after, followed by another two {{ hangon}}s. -- Sigma 7 05:41, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
So, why do you feel the WGO page needs to be deleted?—Preceding unsigned comment added by Mighty D.R. ( talk • contribs)
Thank you for the revert on my user page, much appreciated :-). Cheers! - Myanw 13:10, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting the vandal! Cheers! Geo Swan 23:03, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
Hello, my wikipedia name is lazio_gio You can reach me at lazio_gio@easy.com I feel I have been unfairly blocked, I am not a sock puppet of Vince B. What evidents do they have? I have appealed to the blocking administrator but he is on vacation. Please look into my case (I am not logged in because I am even prevented from editing your discussion page)
just wanted to say thanks for reverting the vandalism on my user page, its much appreciated -- Jac16888 19:59, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
Jac16888 has smiled at you! Smiles promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{
subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
thought i'd stick this in here as well-- Jac16888 21:54, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
Never had my user page vandalized before. Thanks for the revert! -- Iknowyourider ( t c) 16:06, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
I notice you have tagged this page; it's been speedily deleted several times already. Do you knw if there is a way of preventing its re-creation? It would save us all some time … pablomismo|\ talk 15:52, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
hi, you have incorrectly deleted the page I have input. I have posted a Hangon tag, and within 5 minutes the page is deleted ... why has this occured?
"The given reason is: It is an article about a web site, blog, online forum, webcomic, podcast, or similar web content that does not assert the importance or significance of its subject. (CSD A7)"
is incorrect and does not apply to this, however i cannot correct his page since it is COMPLETELY DELETED now. Squarepush3r 09:37, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
hi, thank you for your response. in this case, I have researched and the Movie does not qualify for a Wikipedia page due to lack of sources.
"Third, placing the hangon tag alone does not protect a page from deletion, you have to follow that up by providing an explanation on the article's talk page. "
Don't you think it is silly for an article to be deleted within ~ 3 minutes of posting a HANGON tag, as do you expect talk page articles to be generated instantly? I do not seen how its humanly possibly to instantly generate a talk page, or make a quality one within 3 minutes of placing a TAG. In this case the movie in question does not have adequate sources to justify a Wikiepdia entry, and I will not review the deletion, however that doesn't make correct the deletion of ALL pages wtih speedy deletion tags, or else your system of HANGON tags is worthless. You have answered enough, I will bring my further question with the deleting party. Thank you. Squarepush3r 10:05, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
I do not take the criticism personally, it is a matter of fairness and facts. I did supply direct word-for-word quotes directly from Ebay, which were comminications Ebay sent me in response to feedback issues. I did also previously offer to supply the sources of these quaotes in some form (the email responses sent by Ebay) but I notice nobody took me up on that offer. Direct quotes, even in email are admissable in a court of law, and Wiki is not above the status of a court, so if it's good enough for a courtroom, it should be good enough for Wiki.
I do partially appreciate your addition to a very limited extent, as the addition is a mere shadow of what I submitted, but it is there to be read in its very limited form I guess.
The addition concerning the Benoit case may have been removed after 47 minutes, but my addition was first removed right after I had submitted it.
The point here is to be informative. What I wrote was correct and easily proven or checked by anyone who would make an inquiry. I notice that all you say you did to verify the facts was to look at the Ebay policies, instead of making an inquiry specifically asking if the feedback system had been abused or used for retaliation.
I stand by what I wrote, and it is fact, easily checked or proven for anyone who doubts it.
Hi I noticed you tagged McCarver. Of course the higgledy piggledy way it is written it should quite rightly be deleted but if sorted out it may qualify for an article -it does seem legitimate just written terribly , terribly!!!!
There are many articles on civil war soldiers
What do you think? ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ "Expecting you" Contribs 14:17, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
Your probably right - its just I beleived wikipedia was so developed in its coverage of the American civil war that many of the soldiers had articles. It required a lot of work!!! anyway and wasn't really worth it. Thanks anyway ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ "Expecting you" Contribs 14:29, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
I want to undelete Dave Cataldo—Preceding unsigned comment added by Robinlow ( talk • contribs)
Hi, I noticed you deleted some of my edits to Buzz. If you know a bit about the game as well, Why don't you help me improve it!—Preceding unsigned comment added by Woggy ( talk • contribs) ~ Matticus T C 09:41, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for editing and improving my mistakes. I didn't realise that in the 1st place. But seen as you know a bit about the subject could you possibly display an image of Buzz! Junior: Jungle Party on the article? I am new and don't know how to do this and i don't understand the instructions to do this. At the moment, The article is fine and now includes good information, But i think you will agree it still needs improving. ( Woggy 10:36, 22 July 2007 (UTC))
Hello Matticus,
Actually I'm quite lost within wikipedia and I'm just trying to understand how does it work... I may need to write and edit lots of articles and if you can help me and provide me with some advices It would be great!!
thanks in advance.
Thanks a lot for all these advices... I'm still reading all the documents I have. There are so much rules and policies to respect !!
( Mariepan 11:10, 8 August 2007 (UTC))
This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:Bolexbrothers logo.png. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{ GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{ non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:21, 12 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 20:21, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
Hey there, i noticed you tagged a couple of the Schweigler articles for creation, because i got the others, its clearly just some guy creating articles about his family, however, he also made a category for them, Category:Schweigler, which obviously needs deleting, but i have no experience with category deletion procedures. What do i do about it? Thanks.-- Jac16888 09:28, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for fixing the honeck/Honeck glitch - I was just trying to work out how to do that when you intervened. And thanks for categorizing, too. Mikedash 08:48, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Minus comic.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 13:19, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for fixing the capitalization on the newly-added Jack Belden page.
I was puzzling over how to fix it.
Roregan 15:25, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
Able was I ere I saw your AFD-- Angel David 00:49, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for correcting lactose intolerance page. I'd send you a star but haven't gotten there in my wiki skills yet...-- Tallard 08:09, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
So when i add these edits to your talk page, does it say u have a message? and whats happening with my pic?
Sharkshoooter 11:25, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
i just do not know how to properly use this site and what was wrong with my picture? have u got a "personal problem" with me, will i now have you embuggering me everytime i make an edit? can you not tolerate Humor? :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sharkshoooter ( talk • contribs) 11:17, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for catching the vandal on my userpage. I just don't understand them. I wonder if maybe... I am in the middle of a little argument on the lactose intolerance page, where the other user is getting... POed, is it possible they are related? or is vandalism typically a random act?-- Tallard 19:20, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
is this how u mean to talk?
When moving pages, as you did to
The myth of December 25th, please remember to fix any
double redirects. These can create slow, unpleasant experiences for the reader, waste server resources, and make the navigational structure of the site confusing. Thank you.
VivioFa
teFan (
Talk,
Sandbox)
11:26, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
Yes, indeed it was copy/pasted. But as far as I know, when it´s a LIST, just like the ones listed below this subtitle (main spectacles, bibliography, album sales, etc) we are allow to copy paste. Besides, you only saw it now? You inserted a tag requirement of sources needed and you didn´t even check the "external links"? Lulu Margarida yes? 12:51, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
Is the issue now resolved, or would you like further help? We will need to archive the thread soon, but I don't want to do that prematurely. Adrian M. H. 00:18, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
Hey. I actually had an reference, but I just thought it would be weird to reference just to one phrase. I just added the article because it was really hard to find that information. Let wikipedians vote. Thanks. :>)
Khullah (
talk)
00:14, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
I also fixed the categories. ( Wah Ha Penn ( talk) 11:26, 21 November 2007 (UTC))
i was not completly finished i had to put references and why i made it because the car of Tomorrow is no longer in exestince its the car of today —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nater65721 ( talk • contribs) 19:35, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
when are you going to update the car of today and the logos for 2008 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nater65721 ( talk • contribs) 18:58, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
I write the article about morris not to create a hoax, or prove a useless point, but I write the article so that more people than the 50,000+ already exposed to the use of morris as a slang term meaning for something to be enjoyable or cool. If more people are able to learn of this term then, it can spread and become the real deal. So please, just because the article isn't finished, and doesn't yet seem legitimate, does not mean that it will not be a good page. Furthermore, i can be blocked, but i'm not trying to cause trouble. I have a lready used my account to fix several errors I've encountered. So blocking me would do no overall good for Wikipedia. Let me work in peace and i shall continue to help the general public.
-Nato163 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nato163 ( talk • contribs) 09:24, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar | |
For saving my homepage in the face of vandals thanks. St.daniel 20:57, 17 January 2007 (UTC) |
You're welcome and thanks for protecting my homepage-- St.daniel 21:23, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
Hi, if you find a userpage mistakenly created in mainspace by a new user, as with Nguyen Xuan Huy, please consider doing this:
This is a bit less WP:BITEy than simply deleting the page and often avoids problems. Also, if they continue to re-create their user page in main space (as a vanity article), the fact that it has been explained to them means we can take action without worrying that they are simply clueless. Thanks, Guy ( Help!) 12:30, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
Hi,
I would like to know why you deleted this article. Please reply as soon as possible. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Dathrilla01 ( talk • contribs) 11:48, 24 January 2007 (UTC).
I know it's a crap page, but I was having fun on this other wise dreary encyclopedia full of anally retentive users. kthxbi SchoolBoundstone 11:58, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
I hit the wrong button when saving. I have since gone back and restored it. Jvbishop 15:58, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
It would appear that you assumed the article Martin Heron was created by User:MartinHeron, which it was not -- I created it(!). Just thought I should bring this to your attention if you were using some automatic heuristics which had brought up a false positive... -- Ratarsed 13:30, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
Can you tell me how wikipedia is affected by the five digit dates. If you will check, it's only there in the articles section which I added. I am not changing anybody else's year format, unless I am changing the section also. - Samuel Pakalomattam 21/02/02007
I want to thank what you're doing on Cop Movie (reverting the AfD tags that the contributors keep removing), however you may (and I repeat, may) be violating 3RR, however I am not really completely sure about the exact rules so I'm not sure. Just letting you know, I wouldn't want you to get blocked for doing (what seems to be) the right thing. -- RazorICE talk 09:42, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
Sorry i didn't mean to start false appologies it was an accident and i didn't know what i was doing, or how to delete it. Sorry again.
Hey there. If you revert vandalism, be sure to leave a note on the user's talkpage. A list of templates can be found here. Scalene• UserPage• Talk• Contributions• Biography• Є• 05:40, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
FYI, I protected this article so it can't be recreated and Pelican was indefinitely blocked by another admin. Rlevse 01:49, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
Thanks, it is much appreciated! -- PS2pcGAMER ( talk) 12:03, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
A page you participated in creating, Zombie comedy, has been nominated for deletion. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zombie comedy for the commentary. Captain Infinity 17:44, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
Hi, you reported User:Lolfag1 to AIV because of the inappropriate username. I've indef-blocked the user in question, but for future reference, concerns about inappropriate usernames should be taken to WP:RFCN and not to AIV. Thank you. Wal ton Need some help? 19:32, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
please put back free toast it is a good page and will help wikipidia —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Will.shall.not.stop ( talk • contribs) 12:43, 1 May 2007 (UTC).
Thank you for your speedy action on Kep Enderby. It is a most frustrating problem! Gillyweed 13:25, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
If you could hang on for a few hours you would realise that we're actually providing a background in the large Welwyn Garden City based distributor - and therefore I disagree with your action on this topic. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by WelwynToolGroup ( talk • contribs) 10:33, 4 May 2007 (UTC).
hey. you know the page 'fubby' that you deleted? well, it was an in joke with justin (fubby), who helped me make it. It was not a personal attack or anything. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mercreature ( talk • contribs) 07:29, 13 May 2007 (UTC).
Just on the penisland.net page, you have no idea of the scale of this as a joke in Ireland, it is almost impossible to get through a week of school without someone trying to send you to this website, it happens the country over. I fully realise why you would consider deleting and please go ahead if you feel my reasons aren't valid. cheers Plokt
Actually just delete, it's not worth my hassle trying to argue its existence, Have my leaving cert next week which is slightly more importnat!, perhaps a list of websites containg double entendre's should be created. plokt 15:08, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
I'm sorry for the attacks made on Ten Pound Hammer. But his comment about the deletion of this article was completely unneeded. I feel that the Torrent This! (The Movie) article shouldn't be deleted, thank you. Steelersfannumber1 01:29, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
FYI, the author placed the {{ hangon}} tag in response to the {{ subst:afd}} - which attracts attention as it causes the page to appear in CAT:CSD and CAT:CCSD. Since the author added this, it's presumbed to be {{ db-author}}. The "dontdelete" tag came after, followed by another two {{ hangon}}s. -- Sigma 7 05:41, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
So, why do you feel the WGO page needs to be deleted?—Preceding unsigned comment added by Mighty D.R. ( talk • contribs)
Thank you for the revert on my user page, much appreciated :-). Cheers! - Myanw 13:10, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting the vandal! Cheers! Geo Swan 23:03, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
Hello, my wikipedia name is lazio_gio You can reach me at lazio_gio@easy.com I feel I have been unfairly blocked, I am not a sock puppet of Vince B. What evidents do they have? I have appealed to the blocking administrator but he is on vacation. Please look into my case (I am not logged in because I am even prevented from editing your discussion page)
just wanted to say thanks for reverting the vandalism on my user page, its much appreciated -- Jac16888 19:59, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
Jac16888 has smiled at you! Smiles promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{
subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
thought i'd stick this in here as well-- Jac16888 21:54, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
Never had my user page vandalized before. Thanks for the revert! -- Iknowyourider ( t c) 16:06, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
I notice you have tagged this page; it's been speedily deleted several times already. Do you knw if there is a way of preventing its re-creation? It would save us all some time … pablomismo|\ talk 15:52, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
hi, you have incorrectly deleted the page I have input. I have posted a Hangon tag, and within 5 minutes the page is deleted ... why has this occured?
"The given reason is: It is an article about a web site, blog, online forum, webcomic, podcast, or similar web content that does not assert the importance or significance of its subject. (CSD A7)"
is incorrect and does not apply to this, however i cannot correct his page since it is COMPLETELY DELETED now. Squarepush3r 09:37, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
hi, thank you for your response. in this case, I have researched and the Movie does not qualify for a Wikipedia page due to lack of sources.
"Third, placing the hangon tag alone does not protect a page from deletion, you have to follow that up by providing an explanation on the article's talk page. "
Don't you think it is silly for an article to be deleted within ~ 3 minutes of posting a HANGON tag, as do you expect talk page articles to be generated instantly? I do not seen how its humanly possibly to instantly generate a talk page, or make a quality one within 3 minutes of placing a TAG. In this case the movie in question does not have adequate sources to justify a Wikiepdia entry, and I will not review the deletion, however that doesn't make correct the deletion of ALL pages wtih speedy deletion tags, or else your system of HANGON tags is worthless. You have answered enough, I will bring my further question with the deleting party. Thank you. Squarepush3r 10:05, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
I do not take the criticism personally, it is a matter of fairness and facts. I did supply direct word-for-word quotes directly from Ebay, which were comminications Ebay sent me in response to feedback issues. I did also previously offer to supply the sources of these quaotes in some form (the email responses sent by Ebay) but I notice nobody took me up on that offer. Direct quotes, even in email are admissable in a court of law, and Wiki is not above the status of a court, so if it's good enough for a courtroom, it should be good enough for Wiki.
I do partially appreciate your addition to a very limited extent, as the addition is a mere shadow of what I submitted, but it is there to be read in its very limited form I guess.
The addition concerning the Benoit case may have been removed after 47 minutes, but my addition was first removed right after I had submitted it.
The point here is to be informative. What I wrote was correct and easily proven or checked by anyone who would make an inquiry. I notice that all you say you did to verify the facts was to look at the Ebay policies, instead of making an inquiry specifically asking if the feedback system had been abused or used for retaliation.
I stand by what I wrote, and it is fact, easily checked or proven for anyone who doubts it.
Hi I noticed you tagged McCarver. Of course the higgledy piggledy way it is written it should quite rightly be deleted but if sorted out it may qualify for an article -it does seem legitimate just written terribly , terribly!!!!
There are many articles on civil war soldiers
What do you think? ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ "Expecting you" Contribs 14:17, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
Your probably right - its just I beleived wikipedia was so developed in its coverage of the American civil war that many of the soldiers had articles. It required a lot of work!!! anyway and wasn't really worth it. Thanks anyway ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ "Expecting you" Contribs 14:29, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
I want to undelete Dave Cataldo—Preceding unsigned comment added by Robinlow ( talk • contribs)
Hi, I noticed you deleted some of my edits to Buzz. If you know a bit about the game as well, Why don't you help me improve it!—Preceding unsigned comment added by Woggy ( talk • contribs) ~ Matticus T C 09:41, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for editing and improving my mistakes. I didn't realise that in the 1st place. But seen as you know a bit about the subject could you possibly display an image of Buzz! Junior: Jungle Party on the article? I am new and don't know how to do this and i don't understand the instructions to do this. At the moment, The article is fine and now includes good information, But i think you will agree it still needs improving. ( Woggy 10:36, 22 July 2007 (UTC))
Hello Matticus,
Actually I'm quite lost within wikipedia and I'm just trying to understand how does it work... I may need to write and edit lots of articles and if you can help me and provide me with some advices It would be great!!
thanks in advance.
Thanks a lot for all these advices... I'm still reading all the documents I have. There are so much rules and policies to respect !!
( Mariepan 11:10, 8 August 2007 (UTC))
This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:Bolexbrothers logo.png. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{ GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{ non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:21, 12 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 20:21, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
Hey there, i noticed you tagged a couple of the Schweigler articles for creation, because i got the others, its clearly just some guy creating articles about his family, however, he also made a category for them, Category:Schweigler, which obviously needs deleting, but i have no experience with category deletion procedures. What do i do about it? Thanks.-- Jac16888 09:28, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for fixing the honeck/Honeck glitch - I was just trying to work out how to do that when you intervened. And thanks for categorizing, too. Mikedash 08:48, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Minus comic.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 13:19, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for fixing the capitalization on the newly-added Jack Belden page.
I was puzzling over how to fix it.
Roregan 15:25, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
Able was I ere I saw your AFD-- Angel David 00:49, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for correcting lactose intolerance page. I'd send you a star but haven't gotten there in my wiki skills yet...-- Tallard 08:09, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
So when i add these edits to your talk page, does it say u have a message? and whats happening with my pic?
Sharkshoooter 11:25, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
i just do not know how to properly use this site and what was wrong with my picture? have u got a "personal problem" with me, will i now have you embuggering me everytime i make an edit? can you not tolerate Humor? :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sharkshoooter ( talk • contribs) 11:17, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for catching the vandal on my userpage. I just don't understand them. I wonder if maybe... I am in the middle of a little argument on the lactose intolerance page, where the other user is getting... POed, is it possible they are related? or is vandalism typically a random act?-- Tallard 19:20, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
is this how u mean to talk?
When moving pages, as you did to
The myth of December 25th, please remember to fix any
double redirects. These can create slow, unpleasant experiences for the reader, waste server resources, and make the navigational structure of the site confusing. Thank you.
VivioFa
teFan (
Talk,
Sandbox)
11:26, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
Yes, indeed it was copy/pasted. But as far as I know, when it´s a LIST, just like the ones listed below this subtitle (main spectacles, bibliography, album sales, etc) we are allow to copy paste. Besides, you only saw it now? You inserted a tag requirement of sources needed and you didn´t even check the "external links"? Lulu Margarida yes? 12:51, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
Is the issue now resolved, or would you like further help? We will need to archive the thread soon, but I don't want to do that prematurely. Adrian M. H. 00:18, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
Hey. I actually had an reference, but I just thought it would be weird to reference just to one phrase. I just added the article because it was really hard to find that information. Let wikipedians vote. Thanks. :>)
Khullah (
talk)
00:14, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
I also fixed the categories. ( Wah Ha Penn ( talk) 11:26, 21 November 2007 (UTC))
i was not completly finished i had to put references and why i made it because the car of Tomorrow is no longer in exestince its the car of today —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nater65721 ( talk • contribs) 19:35, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
when are you going to update the car of today and the logos for 2008 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nater65721 ( talk • contribs) 18:58, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
I write the article about morris not to create a hoax, or prove a useless point, but I write the article so that more people than the 50,000+ already exposed to the use of morris as a slang term meaning for something to be enjoyable or cool. If more people are able to learn of this term then, it can spread and become the real deal. So please, just because the article isn't finished, and doesn't yet seem legitimate, does not mean that it will not be a good page. Furthermore, i can be blocked, but i'm not trying to cause trouble. I have a lready used my account to fix several errors I've encountered. So blocking me would do no overall good for Wikipedia. Let me work in peace and i shall continue to help the general public.
-Nato163 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nato163 ( talk • contribs) 09:24, 29 November 2007 (UTC)