Hello, Matthew Drabik!
Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for
your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on
my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to
sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the
edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing!
Ronz (
talk)
22:09, 18 October 2010 (UTC)reply
It would help if you reviewed the relevant policies that contradict your desire to remove content from Wikipedia due to it being "inflammatory" from your personal perspective:
WP:NOTCENSORED and
WP:NPOV. --
Ronz (
talk)
16:14, 19 October 2010 (UTC)reply
Thank you for the message. I greatly respect the rules laid out for Wikipedia. At the time, I was unsure of which content standard it appeared (in my opinion) the link to the Tea Party was violating, which is why I asked for a justification. In retrospect, I should have referenced
WP:IRSMatthew Drabik (
talk)
17:28, 19 October 2010 (UTC)reply
No worries. There's lots to learn with Wikipedia, and these high-visibility articles tend to be far more demanding of editors. --
Ronz (
talk)
23:53, 19 October 2010 (UTC)reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hello, Matthew Drabik!
Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for
your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on
my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to
sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the
edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing!
Ronz (
talk)
22:09, 18 October 2010 (UTC)reply
It would help if you reviewed the relevant policies that contradict your desire to remove content from Wikipedia due to it being "inflammatory" from your personal perspective:
WP:NOTCENSORED and
WP:NPOV. --
Ronz (
talk)
16:14, 19 October 2010 (UTC)reply
Thank you for the message. I greatly respect the rules laid out for Wikipedia. At the time, I was unsure of which content standard it appeared (in my opinion) the link to the Tea Party was violating, which is why I asked for a justification. In retrospect, I should have referenced
WP:IRSMatthew Drabik (
talk)
17:28, 19 October 2010 (UTC)reply
No worries. There's lots to learn with Wikipedia, and these high-visibility articles tend to be far more demanding of editors. --
Ronz (
talk)
23:53, 19 October 2010 (UTC)reply