![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alex Day is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alex Day (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Lagrange613 ( talk) 21:25, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
Hello Martijn. I notice you've been trying to help out the user from the above IP who has posted unblock-en-l. I won't mention their name or organization. This is from a range that was blocked recently by HelloAnnyong per Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Noisetier. It seems unlikely that the person on the list is the same as Noisetier, who appears to be a pusher of unusual views on certain articles about the Middle East. I think it would be OK to create an account for the person on the list. Is that OK with you? Thanks, EdJohnston ( talk) 22:12, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Frederick Glaysher. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Radon Detection ( talk) 11:27, 22 September 2011 (UTC) -->
Following the instructions, I'm letting you know of this Deletion Review.
https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Frederick_Glaysher
https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2010_May_
https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2011_September_21
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alex Day is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alex Day (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Lagrange613 ( talk) 21:25, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
Hello Martijn. I notice you've been trying to help out the user from the above IP who has posted unblock-en-l. I won't mention their name or organization. This is from a range that was blocked recently by HelloAnnyong per Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Noisetier. It seems unlikely that the person on the list is the same as Noisetier, who appears to be a pusher of unusual views on certain articles about the Middle East. I think it would be OK to create an account for the person on the list. Is that OK with you? Thanks, EdJohnston ( talk) 22:12, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Frederick Glaysher. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Radon Detection ( talk) 11:27, 22 September 2011 (UTC) -->
Following the instructions, I'm letting you know of this Deletion Review.
https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Frederick_Glaysher
https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2010_May_
https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2011_September_21