Thank you for the wonderfull edit of the Spanish Monarchy article it is a 100% improvment over the old one!!-- Marked4life ( talk) 05:14, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
"I planing to flesh out this section as I dig more info from my files."
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Spanish Royal Guard may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 06:12, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi - You have cited various senior appointments made by the Queen as Commander-in-Chief to "The Queens Regulations for the Army". I have checked and the Army Regulations do not mention the First Sea Lord, or the Commander Operations (Navy) or the Fleet Commander or the Chief of the Air Staff. In fact the Army Regulations do not even mention some of the Army Commanders: please can you remove this section as it seems to me to be very misleading. Best wishes. Dormskirk ( talk) 21:57, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
The regulations for the army state that all appointments held by officers of the rank of two stars or above must be approved by Queen. As such there is no need to remove the section on appointments because it is accurate. The section makes clear that the Her Majesty’s secretary of state for defense nominates a candidate to the queen for her approval of the appointment. Therefore, the section reflects the fact as stated by the regulations for the army and is not misleading. Thank you for your comments. Best wishes.-- Marked4life ( talk) 23:03, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
All appointments listed in the queen and military appointment section are regularly announced on the Ministry of Defense website as being made by the approval of the queen. This includes the appointments too those "two-star an above" posts in the Navy and the Air Force. Therefore, the information on appointments in this section is factual. It is in no way "misleading", as such there is no reason to remove the section in question as it is both relitive to the subject of the artical and informitive.
The list is, of course, not exhaustive. I will expand it, as time permits. You are yourself welcome to list additional officer posts at your leisure. Best wishes.-- Marked4life ( talk) 23:18, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
I answered you on another editor's page. I dug deeper and found Talk:Head of the British Armed Forces#Senior appointments made by Her Majesty as Commander-in-Chief which seems to have triggered the entire thing. I have no ability to make any judgement on this matter at all, and offer no opinion on it, save for the advcie I gave on the other editor's page. I'm having a senior moment and have forgotten where that was.
Please relax about it. The admin I spoke of may not be online right now, may even be asleep. Fiddle Faddle 21:30, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
not the Royal Navy's. BlueD954 ( talk) 23:16, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
8
Please, can you find the complete list of commanders from 1504 to now, and edit it on the page? Thank you very much! -- 79.35.154.3 15:00, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for the wonderfull edit of the Spanish Monarchy article it is a 100% improvment over the old one!!-- Marked4life ( talk) 05:14, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
"I planing to flesh out this section as I dig more info from my files."
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Spanish Royal Guard may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 06:12, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi - You have cited various senior appointments made by the Queen as Commander-in-Chief to "The Queens Regulations for the Army". I have checked and the Army Regulations do not mention the First Sea Lord, or the Commander Operations (Navy) or the Fleet Commander or the Chief of the Air Staff. In fact the Army Regulations do not even mention some of the Army Commanders: please can you remove this section as it seems to me to be very misleading. Best wishes. Dormskirk ( talk) 21:57, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
The regulations for the army state that all appointments held by officers of the rank of two stars or above must be approved by Queen. As such there is no need to remove the section on appointments because it is accurate. The section makes clear that the Her Majesty’s secretary of state for defense nominates a candidate to the queen for her approval of the appointment. Therefore, the section reflects the fact as stated by the regulations for the army and is not misleading. Thank you for your comments. Best wishes.-- Marked4life ( talk) 23:03, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
All appointments listed in the queen and military appointment section are regularly announced on the Ministry of Defense website as being made by the approval of the queen. This includes the appointments too those "two-star an above" posts in the Navy and the Air Force. Therefore, the information on appointments in this section is factual. It is in no way "misleading", as such there is no reason to remove the section in question as it is both relitive to the subject of the artical and informitive.
The list is, of course, not exhaustive. I will expand it, as time permits. You are yourself welcome to list additional officer posts at your leisure. Best wishes.-- Marked4life ( talk) 23:18, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
I answered you on another editor's page. I dug deeper and found Talk:Head of the British Armed Forces#Senior appointments made by Her Majesty as Commander-in-Chief which seems to have triggered the entire thing. I have no ability to make any judgement on this matter at all, and offer no opinion on it, save for the advcie I gave on the other editor's page. I'm having a senior moment and have forgotten where that was.
Please relax about it. The admin I spoke of may not be online right now, may even be asleep. Fiddle Faddle 21:30, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
not the Royal Navy's. BlueD954 ( talk) 23:16, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
8
Please, can you find the complete list of commanders from 1504 to now, and edit it on the page? Thank you very much! -- 79.35.154.3 15:00, 3 September 2021 (UTC)