Hi! You wrote this as the reason for the deletion of the page:
I am the developer in MagicPlot. I agree with (1) and (3) and I don't want to discuss the deletion itself. I want to discuss the (2) sentence. Why did you wrote 'unprofessional' (did you tried the software or only the site?) and why do you thing that the non-free software from independent vendors 'has no chance to stand against free projects'? Look at Pixelmator for example. Electriq ( talk) 21:33, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
You removed the PMID and BibCode from the example where it was intended to show ALL identifiers. What you mean to show is what is below, in the example where identifiers are omitted. It was specifically chosen to see the difference between the two. I have therefore reverted your edit to the initiating text of the RfC. -- Dirk Beetstra T C 09:39, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 14:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi! You wrote this as the reason for the deletion of the page:
I am the developer in MagicPlot. I agree with (1) and (3) and I don't want to discuss the deletion itself. I want to discuss the (2) sentence. Why did you wrote 'unprofessional' (did you tried the software or only the site?) and why do you thing that the non-free software from independent vendors 'has no chance to stand against free projects'? Look at Pixelmator for example. Electriq ( talk) 21:33, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
You removed the PMID and BibCode from the example where it was intended to show ALL identifiers. What you mean to show is what is below, in the example where identifiers are omitted. It was specifically chosen to see the difference between the two. I have therefore reverted your edit to the initiating text of the RfC. -- Dirk Beetstra T C 09:39, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 14:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)