Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:CaseTalk, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot ( talk) 01:30, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Marco.wobben. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, " CaseTalk".
In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot ( talk) 02:00, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
Hello. Your recent edit to
Comparison of data modeling tools appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list
should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's
notability guideline. Thank you.
MrOllie (
talk)
15:37, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
![]() | Hello Marco.wobben. You used the {{
Help me}} template, but you wanted an answer from a specific editor. If you still need help, please add your question to that editor's talk page instead. Alternatively, you can ask your question at the
Teahouse, the
help desk, or join
Wikipedia's Live Help IRC channel to get real-time assistance. |
Thanks for pointing that out. I've had this page undeleted and I am in the process of rewriting it. The goal is to have CaseTalk which is data modeling tool similar to Norma, and facilitates ER/Studio and PowerDesigner, to be listed and documented on wikipedia. Since it is the sole tool that supports the method FCO-IM, it might be useful to be listed. Can anyone advice in regard to the style of the content and my potential COI?
Can you please describe your COI here? What kind of conflict of interest do you have? To reply click here and add your message at the end. Thanks, -- Gryllida ( talk) 05:33, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
There are two tools available that support the modeling method FCO-IM which is still used in educational institutes. A freeware version of earlier prototypes which is not actively maintained since the beginning of this century. And a tool called CaseTalk which is offered for free for educational purposes. I'm the maintainer of this product now since 2001. When I'm playing honest and nice, the Draft:CaseTalk gets removed the next day. So I'm not sure how to proceed in this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.87.123.53 ( talk) 08:00, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
Hi @ Gryllida:, @ MrOllie: & @ I dream of horses:, I'm responsible for trying to get a page called CaseTalk up. I've started the draft, mentioned my COI, en before I could react, the page got removed already. The relevance is that there are two tools available that support the modeling method FCO-IM which is used in educational institutes. (1) A freeware version of earlier prototypes which is not actively maintained since the beginning of this century. (2) A tool called CaseTalk which is offered for free for educational purposes. The COI is that I'm the maintainer of this product now since 2001. I've tried to align the text similar to other data modeling tools on the market. So I'm not sure how to proceed in getting this listed without people tagging and removing it as advertorial. I'm trying not to be that. Can you help or give advice? Regards. Marco.wobben ( talk) 19:25, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
Hi @ Gryllida:, thanks for the pointers. Some of these sources were mentioned on the original page in proper ref-formats. I'll quickly iterate the full list. In regard to your question, I can say "I don't get paid for this editing".
Dutch Educational pages
Marco.wobben ( talk) 08:47, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
Hello, Marco.wobben, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.
I noticed that one of the first articles you edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.
To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.
One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)
In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.
Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
talk pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on
my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
Jimfbleak -
talk to me?
05:42, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Hi Marco.wobben
Thank you for listing these sources above in another section. Next to each of them could you please list what useful information about CaseTalk do these sources include? Include a sentence or two with a short description of information which the source provides. This could be useful as the first step for creating the skeleton of the article draft. --
Gryllida (
talk)
06:56, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:CaseTalk, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot ( talk) 01:30, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Marco.wobben. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, " CaseTalk".
In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot ( talk) 02:00, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
Hello. Your recent edit to
Comparison of data modeling tools appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list
should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's
notability guideline. Thank you.
MrOllie (
talk)
15:37, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
![]() | Hello Marco.wobben. You used the {{
Help me}} template, but you wanted an answer from a specific editor. If you still need help, please add your question to that editor's talk page instead. Alternatively, you can ask your question at the
Teahouse, the
help desk, or join
Wikipedia's Live Help IRC channel to get real-time assistance. |
Thanks for pointing that out. I've had this page undeleted and I am in the process of rewriting it. The goal is to have CaseTalk which is data modeling tool similar to Norma, and facilitates ER/Studio and PowerDesigner, to be listed and documented on wikipedia. Since it is the sole tool that supports the method FCO-IM, it might be useful to be listed. Can anyone advice in regard to the style of the content and my potential COI?
Can you please describe your COI here? What kind of conflict of interest do you have? To reply click here and add your message at the end. Thanks, -- Gryllida ( talk) 05:33, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
There are two tools available that support the modeling method FCO-IM which is still used in educational institutes. A freeware version of earlier prototypes which is not actively maintained since the beginning of this century. And a tool called CaseTalk which is offered for free for educational purposes. I'm the maintainer of this product now since 2001. When I'm playing honest and nice, the Draft:CaseTalk gets removed the next day. So I'm not sure how to proceed in this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.87.123.53 ( talk) 08:00, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
Hi @ Gryllida:, @ MrOllie: & @ I dream of horses:, I'm responsible for trying to get a page called CaseTalk up. I've started the draft, mentioned my COI, en before I could react, the page got removed already. The relevance is that there are two tools available that support the modeling method FCO-IM which is used in educational institutes. (1) A freeware version of earlier prototypes which is not actively maintained since the beginning of this century. (2) A tool called CaseTalk which is offered for free for educational purposes. The COI is that I'm the maintainer of this product now since 2001. I've tried to align the text similar to other data modeling tools on the market. So I'm not sure how to proceed in getting this listed without people tagging and removing it as advertorial. I'm trying not to be that. Can you help or give advice? Regards. Marco.wobben ( talk) 19:25, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
Hi @ Gryllida:, thanks for the pointers. Some of these sources were mentioned on the original page in proper ref-formats. I'll quickly iterate the full list. In regard to your question, I can say "I don't get paid for this editing".
Dutch Educational pages
Marco.wobben ( talk) 08:47, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
Hello, Marco.wobben, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.
I noticed that one of the first articles you edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.
To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.
One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)
In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.
Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
talk pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on
my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
Jimfbleak -
talk to me?
05:42, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Hi Marco.wobben
Thank you for listing these sources above in another section. Next to each of them could you please list what useful information about CaseTalk do these sources include? Include a sentence or two with a short description of information which the source provides. This could be useful as the first step for creating the skeleton of the article draft. --
Gryllida (
talk)
06:56, 1 May 2020 (UTC)