This is ManuelLopezz's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
![]() |
Hi ManuelLopezz! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 8 November 2020 (UTC) |
Whoever you are, please stop adding false "information" to the Lagniappe page. You are wasting your time because I'm just going to remove it every time you do it. It takes about 10 seconds.
Sam Jones actually had to replay nearly $10,000 in campaign contributions because of the DA's investigation.
≈≈≈≈≈ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lagniappemobile ( talk • contribs) 18:14, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. OhNoitsJamie Talk 22:11, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
ManuelLopezz ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I have been blocked without any due process, no investigation, and no opportunity for a defense. The administrator who blocked did not open a sockpuppetry case and didn't request checkuser, he/she simply blocked me based on a "hunch" or suspicion without any consensus or due process. WP:DUCK requires that "Unless there is evidence which proves otherwise beyond a reasonable doubt, editors must assume good faith from others." It appears that the administrator who issued the block has an ax to grind against anyone who edits in the subject area that I was editing in, given the administrator's block history. The blocking administrator has had a history of continuing to blame random IPs and users that edit these articles as "socks" of a banned user fron years ago, see /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/BigDwiki/Archive where another administrator wrote "After review with Xaosflux, this does not appear to be sock puppetry by BigDwiki. Closing." ManuelLopezz talk 22:17, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You must be joking. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 00:54, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
( block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Appeal on your original account. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 00:59, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
This is ManuelLopezz's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
![]() |
Hi ManuelLopezz! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 8 November 2020 (UTC) |
Whoever you are, please stop adding false "information" to the Lagniappe page. You are wasting your time because I'm just going to remove it every time you do it. It takes about 10 seconds.
Sam Jones actually had to replay nearly $10,000 in campaign contributions because of the DA's investigation.
≈≈≈≈≈ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lagniappemobile ( talk • contribs) 18:14, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. OhNoitsJamie Talk 22:11, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
ManuelLopezz ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I have been blocked without any due process, no investigation, and no opportunity for a defense. The administrator who blocked did not open a sockpuppetry case and didn't request checkuser, he/she simply blocked me based on a "hunch" or suspicion without any consensus or due process. WP:DUCK requires that "Unless there is evidence which proves otherwise beyond a reasonable doubt, editors must assume good faith from others." It appears that the administrator who issued the block has an ax to grind against anyone who edits in the subject area that I was editing in, given the administrator's block history. The blocking administrator has had a history of continuing to blame random IPs and users that edit these articles as "socks" of a banned user fron years ago, see /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/BigDwiki/Archive where another administrator wrote "After review with Xaosflux, this does not appear to be sock puppetry by BigDwiki. Closing." ManuelLopezz talk 22:17, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You must be joking. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 00:54, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
( block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Appeal on your original account. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 00:59, 16 February 2021 (UTC)