Hello, MalcolmMD. We
welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things
you have written about in the article
Spotify, you may have a
conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the
conflict of interest guideline and
FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:
In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).
Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. I have seen (presumably) your post on the Spotify forum, which is also the source/reference that you provided. This definitely constitutes a COI because of your direct involvement in this. I would not tag you with an improper citation notice, but would like to say that beyond your COI, the source you provided is not a credible one. Zamaster4536 ( talk) 12:44, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
Hello, MalcolmMD. We
welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things
you have written about in the article
Spotify, you may have a
conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the
conflict of interest guideline and
FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:
In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).
Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. I have seen (presumably) your post on the Spotify forum, which is also the source/reference that you provided. This definitely constitutes a COI because of your direct involvement in this. I would not tag you with an improper citation notice, but would like to say that beyond your COI, the source you provided is not a credible one. Zamaster4536 ( talk) 12:44, 30 June 2016 (UTC)