Hi, please be aware that the stats in players' infoboxes contain only league games and apps ( see here). -- Jaellee ( talk) 20:43, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
And if you update the stats in the infoboxes, please take care that you also update the "pcupdate" (for club goals and apps) or the ntupdate (for the national team) parameter. Thanks. -- Jaellee ( talk) 21:20, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Gligor Gligorov
A tag has been placed on Gligor Gligorov requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}} to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact
one of these admins to request that they
userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.
Alastair Rae (
talk)
11:54, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
This website took club stats from pc game Football Manager and Ǵurovski's are totally wrong.-- Oleola ( talk) 19:12, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
When you see a BLPPROD tag, you can not just delete it, like you did here. If you want to remove the template, then you MUST insert the references that you have found. Thank you, The-Pope ( talk) 02:37, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
Hi Maklion, listen, can you tell me if there are any new foreign players in Macedonian First League now after the winter transfer window? I have followed the transfers at macedonianfootball.com but the last time they updated the list was already a while ago and by then there weren´t any. I touth that perhaps you know more. FkpCascais ( talk) 02:07, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
- Many thanks for you answer Maklion. I know that it is not easy to have much info on the League, that is why I touth that you might know more. Let me know if you get to know anything on that issue. My point was to add any new foreign players in Macedonia to the List of foreign footballers in top leagues of former Yugoslavia. Best regards, FkpCascais ( talk) 19:17, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
|
The Modest Barnstar | |
| Thanks for your recent contributions! - 129.49.72.78 ( talk) 19:01, 29 April 2011 (UTC) |
Hi there, I will try to correct this.
Thanks!
Geregen2 ( talk) 02:55, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
Maklion, please see the thread I opened on Macedonia national football team talk page. You can´t choose which players you like considering "notable" and which you don´t... And why 5? Says who, you? Why not 4 or 7? The list has to have a inclusion criterium, otherwise can be deleted. FkpCascais ( talk) 21:45, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
- I propose we list all other players that played over the year, like in
National-Football-Teams.com. I am not sure you understand the WP problem of "choosing" players one editor prefers over anothers, and the reason why those types of decitions are avoided exactly because of it. Like in "Notable players" lists in clubs, where the community agreed to have inclusion criteriums, and not having particular editors choosing players they personally prefer, same as in this case... Why not Spirovski? Why is Spirovski worste then Despotovski? Why limit 5? See my point? We, wikipedia editors, don´t
own articles, and we don´t have the right to impose certain decitions without any valid reason...
FkpCascais (
talk)
21:54, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
- But Maklion, you are wrong, most national team have is a "recent call-ups" section where all players in a certain period of time are included, regardless of the number of caps, or number of defenders/midfielders, or whatever. See England for exemple. Wikipedia allways encourages a strict inclusion criterium, like in English or Serbian case, against random lists which a specific editor prefers and which may be contested by another editor... That is exactly what I meant whith those questions (why Despotovski? Why X or Y?) because we need to have a inclusion criterium to have answers for those questions. FkpCascais ( talk) 22:09, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
Maklion, sorry, but I still think you fail to understand that you can´t have 5 (why 5?) players per position, or anything else but all players called in last 12 months... I tried to explain that to you, but you still add players for wrong reason (5 per position). I opened a thread about this issue here: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Football#Macedonia_national_football_team and Talk:Macedonia_national_football_team#Other_notable_players.3F. FkpCascais ( talk) 20:49, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
Hi Maklion. I was trying to expand the article and I noteced NFT site talks about his 7 caps with Vardar in 2000-01. Do you know any way so we could confirm this? I also noteced you already discussed some stats with Oleola earlier here, was about this? It sounds a bit unbeleavable, as he was only 15/16 at that time, but... If you know anything about this let me know. I also founded one source saying he played in the youth team of Cukaricki, and it is the club comemorative monografija, so I beleave is reliable as I doubt they would be lyeing about that and a relatevely recent period in a comemorative official book. Anyway, I just wanted also to say hi and tell you sorry for being hard on you about the Macedonian NT article, I just wanted to make you became more familiarised with wiki principles and how strict inclusion criteriums are easier to work with. I hope we can work together to improve as much as we can all Macedonian articles. Well, you have been doing a great job all around. Best regards. FkpCascais ( talk) 05:57, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
- OK, we leave that information out by now as unconfirmed. If you ever find any website with squads and stats from past Macedonian League seasons, please let me know. Seems incredible that we still don´t have any Macedonian website with past seasons of MPL. In MacedonianFootball.com I only find current season teams, and I am desperatelly searching for team squads of past MPL seasons of the 1990s and 2000s. FkpCascais ( talk) 02:06, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
The article Damjan Šiškovski has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Sir Sputnik (
talk)
01:11, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
The article Filip Gligorov has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Sir Sputnik (
talk)
01:11, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
The article Edin Skenderović has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Sir Sputnik (
talk)
01:15, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
The article Agron Memedi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Sir Sputnik (
talk)
01:18, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
The article Stole Dimitrievski has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Sir Sputnik (
talk)
02:12, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
I saw you updated my mistake in the newest squad of the national team - thanks for correcting me, they are indeed friendly games, dont know what I was thinking LOL
But you also corrected Glisics position and said that he only plays as CB and no other positions and I think you have mistaken him with someone else. His natural position is definitely a (left) winger (that is also his position on Transfermarkt, and the position he always played for in the U-21 team and in all his former clubs back when he played in the Macedonian PMFL), but he can also play as left back (which is his secondary position), which he is in the matter of fact usually playing in his current club right now. So I was indeed in doubts whether to write him as midfielder or defender, and I dont mind leaving him as you changed it, but I was still confused if you had the right player in mind when you made the change since you said he only plays as CB and no other positions, which is surely not the case with Glisic so I was wondering if you made a mistake and thought of someone else, or were you indeed talking about him..?
From Msb73505
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
14:14, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Nobody owns any page on Wikipedia, and you have no right to shun anyone from it based on their nationality (we call that "bigotry"). If what you have written is true, prove it. That is the basis of Wikipedia. And you can't have a list of "Memorable matches", define to me what is a "Memorable match" and what is not. '''tAD''' ( talk) 22:29, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
- See WP:UNSOURCED. The role is yours to prove these things. There is no rule that it should remain just because it is a lot of information. '''tAD''' ( talk) 22:39, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Maklion19. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Maklion19. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Maklion19. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi, please be aware that the stats in players' infoboxes contain only league games and apps ( see here). -- Jaellee ( talk) 20:43, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
And if you update the stats in the infoboxes, please take care that you also update the "pcupdate" (for club goals and apps) or the ntupdate (for the national team) parameter. Thanks. -- Jaellee ( talk) 21:20, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Gligor Gligorov
A tag has been placed on Gligor Gligorov requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}} to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact
one of these admins to request that they
userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.
Alastair Rae (
talk)
11:54, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
This website took club stats from pc game Football Manager and Ǵurovski's are totally wrong.-- Oleola ( talk) 19:12, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
When you see a BLPPROD tag, you can not just delete it, like you did here. If you want to remove the template, then you MUST insert the references that you have found. Thank you, The-Pope ( talk) 02:37, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
Hi Maklion, listen, can you tell me if there are any new foreign players in Macedonian First League now after the winter transfer window? I have followed the transfers at macedonianfootball.com but the last time they updated the list was already a while ago and by then there weren´t any. I touth that perhaps you know more. FkpCascais ( talk) 02:07, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
- Many thanks for you answer Maklion. I know that it is not easy to have much info on the League, that is why I touth that you might know more. Let me know if you get to know anything on that issue. My point was to add any new foreign players in Macedonia to the List of foreign footballers in top leagues of former Yugoslavia. Best regards, FkpCascais ( talk) 19:17, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
|
|
The Modest Barnstar | |
| Thanks for your recent contributions! - 129.49.72.78 ( talk) 19:01, 29 April 2011 (UTC) |
Hi there, I will try to correct this.
Thanks!
Geregen2 ( talk) 02:55, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
Maklion, please see the thread I opened on Macedonia national football team talk page. You can´t choose which players you like considering "notable" and which you don´t... And why 5? Says who, you? Why not 4 or 7? The list has to have a inclusion criterium, otherwise can be deleted. FkpCascais ( talk) 21:45, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
- I propose we list all other players that played over the year, like in
National-Football-Teams.com. I am not sure you understand the WP problem of "choosing" players one editor prefers over anothers, and the reason why those types of decitions are avoided exactly because of it. Like in "Notable players" lists in clubs, where the community agreed to have inclusion criteriums, and not having particular editors choosing players they personally prefer, same as in this case... Why not Spirovski? Why is Spirovski worste then Despotovski? Why limit 5? See my point? We, wikipedia editors, don´t
own articles, and we don´t have the right to impose certain decitions without any valid reason...
FkpCascais (
talk)
21:54, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
- But Maklion, you are wrong, most national team have is a "recent call-ups" section where all players in a certain period of time are included, regardless of the number of caps, or number of defenders/midfielders, or whatever. See England for exemple. Wikipedia allways encourages a strict inclusion criterium, like in English or Serbian case, against random lists which a specific editor prefers and which may be contested by another editor... That is exactly what I meant whith those questions (why Despotovski? Why X or Y?) because we need to have a inclusion criterium to have answers for those questions. FkpCascais ( talk) 22:09, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
Maklion, sorry, but I still think you fail to understand that you can´t have 5 (why 5?) players per position, or anything else but all players called in last 12 months... I tried to explain that to you, but you still add players for wrong reason (5 per position). I opened a thread about this issue here: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Football#Macedonia_national_football_team and Talk:Macedonia_national_football_team#Other_notable_players.3F. FkpCascais ( talk) 20:49, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
Hi Maklion. I was trying to expand the article and I noteced NFT site talks about his 7 caps with Vardar in 2000-01. Do you know any way so we could confirm this? I also noteced you already discussed some stats with Oleola earlier here, was about this? It sounds a bit unbeleavable, as he was only 15/16 at that time, but... If you know anything about this let me know. I also founded one source saying he played in the youth team of Cukaricki, and it is the club comemorative monografija, so I beleave is reliable as I doubt they would be lyeing about that and a relatevely recent period in a comemorative official book. Anyway, I just wanted also to say hi and tell you sorry for being hard on you about the Macedonian NT article, I just wanted to make you became more familiarised with wiki principles and how strict inclusion criteriums are easier to work with. I hope we can work together to improve as much as we can all Macedonian articles. Well, you have been doing a great job all around. Best regards. FkpCascais ( talk) 05:57, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
- OK, we leave that information out by now as unconfirmed. If you ever find any website with squads and stats from past Macedonian League seasons, please let me know. Seems incredible that we still don´t have any Macedonian website with past seasons of MPL. In MacedonianFootball.com I only find current season teams, and I am desperatelly searching for team squads of past MPL seasons of the 1990s and 2000s. FkpCascais ( talk) 02:06, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
The article Damjan Šiškovski has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Sir Sputnik (
talk)
01:11, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
The article Filip Gligorov has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Sir Sputnik (
talk)
01:11, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
The article Edin Skenderović has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Sir Sputnik (
talk)
01:15, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
The article Agron Memedi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Sir Sputnik (
talk)
01:18, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
The article Stole Dimitrievski has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Sir Sputnik (
talk)
02:12, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
I saw you updated my mistake in the newest squad of the national team - thanks for correcting me, they are indeed friendly games, dont know what I was thinking LOL
But you also corrected Glisics position and said that he only plays as CB and no other positions and I think you have mistaken him with someone else. His natural position is definitely a (left) winger (that is also his position on Transfermarkt, and the position he always played for in the U-21 team and in all his former clubs back when he played in the Macedonian PMFL), but he can also play as left back (which is his secondary position), which he is in the matter of fact usually playing in his current club right now. So I was indeed in doubts whether to write him as midfielder or defender, and I dont mind leaving him as you changed it, but I was still confused if you had the right player in mind when you made the change since you said he only plays as CB and no other positions, which is surely not the case with Glisic so I was wondering if you made a mistake and thought of someone else, or were you indeed talking about him..?
From Msb73505
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
14:14, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Nobody owns any page on Wikipedia, and you have no right to shun anyone from it based on their nationality (we call that "bigotry"). If what you have written is true, prove it. That is the basis of Wikipedia. And you can't have a list of "Memorable matches", define to me what is a "Memorable match" and what is not. '''tAD''' ( talk) 22:29, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
- See WP:UNSOURCED. The role is yours to prove these things. There is no rule that it should remain just because it is a lot of information. '''tAD''' ( talk) 22:39, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Maklion19. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Maklion19. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Maklion19. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)