![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Thank you for voting in my RfA which at 51/20/6 unfortunately did not achieve consensus. In closing the nomination, Essjay remarked that it was one of the better discussed RfAs seen recently and I would like to thank you and all others who chose to vote for making it as such. It was extremely humbling to see the large number of support votes, and the number of oppose votes and comments will help me to become stronger. I hope to run again for adminship soon. Thank you all once more. Wikiwoohoo 20:09, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
{{helpme}}
I read that if I cite a resource that I read somewhere else, I need to say where it's from. If I'm getting an article from a commercial database (like LexisNexis) with no real link, and the article's no longer available from the source, how do I cite that?
I have granted rollback rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, I believe you can be trusted to use rollback correctly, and for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback and Wikipedia:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck and thanks. — Tivedshambo ( t/ c) 06:28, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.
For the guideline on reviewing, see Wikipedia:Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.
If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles 06:56, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
please stop vanadalizing my profile
thank you —Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.115.222.89 ( talk) 19:54, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
sorry —Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.210.203.129 ( talk) 01:19, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
Please revert the redirect. The original Yakouts page was written by non-Sakha person and probably second language speaker. The quality of language is substandard and factual information is distorted. So I'm reverting your reversion. The way this nations name is mostly known in English speaking world is probably Sakha, while I barely know any use of "Yakouts" in any high level literature. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.49.163.21 ( talk) 02:56, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
The page MV Stena Navigator is an exact copy of MS Stena Navigator. The majority of articles about motor vessels begin with 'MS' rather than 'MV'. So a redirect to MS Stena Navigator is justified. Philphos ( talk) 15:15, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
Mahewa Please, delete the article about Larkin Community Hospital. You are an outstanding member of Wikipedia.
This is an article that does not meet the relevant and educative criteria for content of the encyclopedia and this stub is unsuitable, unhelpful, and does not meet the required criteria, giving a business or institutional negative image. This stub must be proposed to be deleted for a good cause. This is considered Vandalism because it is including only unofficial information from some local articles acting in a direction or course opposite to the real prestige of this organization (see the institution’s official page). This stub is demonstrating some intentional, personal, premeditate AND unethical behavior; because author only is encouraging to our community to review some past negative local scandalous articles with non-evidenced allegations from sensationalist’s acting against the reputation of this organization. (A scandal is a widely publicized allegation or set of allegations that damages the reputation of an institution, individual or creed) This short article is over-hyping insignificant events, being deliberately controversial, loud, self centered or acting to acquire a negative opinion of many people using wikipedia. PLEASE, if you want to write an article about this institution, you will refer to the positive history and important programs that this hospital has been offering to the community of South Florida over many years and they are also saying incorrectly the number of institutional beds. Defamation=calumny, vilification, slander (for transitory statements), and libel (for written, broadcast, or otherwise published words)—is the communication of a statement that makes a claim, expressly stated or implied to be factual, that may give an individual, business, product, group, government, or nation a negative image. Please, take a positive and compassionate action! Thanks, God bless you! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.34.156.194 ( talk) 20:17, 20 August 2010 (UTC)