![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hi Angr! Would you care to take a look at my suggestion at Template talk:Indo-European studies? Thanks -- ἀνυπόδητος ( talk) 17:43, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
Hi Angr, on the TEB728 talk page where you refered me to WP:BOLD, discuss, revert cycle. The revision as protected by TEB728 is non standard. TEB728 wishes not to discuss appropriately. If anyone knows standard knowledge of the English language you, yourself would claim to be such a one. You express no views. That is your perogative. Silly if you ask me. Cya ~ R. T. G 18:44, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
Forgive me for asking you, but could you help out by keeping an eye on two editors (unless one is a sockpuppet) trying to change English-language terminology for this script? They're doing it on the hu.wikipedia.org as well. The roots of this are in a dispute as to what the name should be in the UCS. See the history as well. Thanks! -- Evertype· ✆ 22:11, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
For your vote at Roman Catholic Church. I am sorry to inform you that we failed FAC but will again be at peer review in a few weeks to sort things out. Hopefully we will make it through next time. We will be contacting all supporters and opposers of the article when we open the next peer review to hopefully get all issues addressed and hashed out before the next FAC try. Thanks again for your time and attention to this important article. NancyHeise talk 01:14, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
Hello. Wandering the wiki I came across a comment on the Manchester talk page mentioning that the IPA was wrong, reflecting a West Country accent which seemed slightly bizarre. The article being protected, but this not seeming to have been part of any disputes I could see, and nobody having replied to this person, I logged in for the first time in ages, and probably the last time in a while too :) to sort it out, since it did seem rather strange. Having done that, I finally managed to find the edit where it was changed and saw it was you. And your edit summary, and knowing you, made me think you probably had a very good reason. So now I'm worried I broke some subtle thing you did, although making it rhotic seemed strange.
So yeah, just a heads-up that I changed it and an apology if I've screwed something up. :-/ Skittle ( talk) 23:19, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
Hey. There are lots of films called Oedipus Rex listed on the imdb. DionysosProteus ( talk) 15:26, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
Hi, I believe that a conversation conducted via edit summaries is not very fruitful. The Request for Comment touches on two areas: (1) Biographies of Living Persons (BLP) because Bernard Lewis is alive; and (2) Language and linguistics because this particular dispute concerns the translation of a particular use of the French word "condamn´e" into English. I would have thought that my explanation that translation is applied linguistics is fairly uncontroversial, but if you disagree then please let me know here or on my Talk page.-- Goodmorningworld ( talk) 23:59, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
All issues related to a topic area, even if about the article title or inclusion of images, go in the section for that topic area. If you are not certain in which area an issue belongs, pick the one that's closest, or inquire at the help desk.
Anybody home?-- Goodmorningworld ( talk) 13:48, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
Hi, Angr. This is a friendly notice to inform you that a category on which you commented Category:Anti-semitic people has been nominated for deletion. The conversation is located here. Regards, Aramgar ( talk) 17:39, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
...or are you just especially attentive and nice? -- Cheers, Deborahjay ( talk) 14:42, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
Per your previous question, I asked a priest at our church who is also a university professor, he said it is at the pastor's discretion whether or not to offer the Eucharist under "both species". NancyHeise talk 18:40, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
The only reason that Tenmei ( talk · contribs) put the three templates to the article and "redirect" page is the hospital's name related to Yonsei, not the content of the article itself. So RFC for language is I think a fit one.-- Caspian blue 16:10, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
This is the sequence of edits which are wrongly described as harassment. A simple question about the need for a credible citation consistent with WP:V, is twisted into a Gordian Knot for which I am not to be blamed:
PROBLEM:
Caspian blue alone deserves to be held accountable for disingenuous complaints which
Caspian blue has created.
QUESTION: What about the initial RfC issue? Without credible citations supporting the use of the explicit phrase "
Yonsei Severance Hospital," is it not "trolling" and not disruptive to delete the unsourced phrase after repeatedly asking for compliance with
WP:V?
I do not know how to address this needlessly complicated mess. -- Tenmei ( talk) 06:14, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
Hello. I'm not sure what content was under Chondalwood, Lapaliiya, Pirate Isles, Ruathym, and Tortured Land when you deleted them; since then a redirect has been placed on each. If it was not copyvio, could you please restore the edit history for these? Thanks!
Also, would you be able to restore the edit history of Storm Silverhand in a similar manner? If you like, you can redirect that one to List of Forgotten Realms characters. Thanks! :) BOZ ( talk) 16:22, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
I'm pretty annoyed by your closing of this image discussion. You obviously didn't read the rationale even though I asked you to - that image met the NFCC; I even fixed the rationale to make it do that better. Why can't you be more co-operative in sorting out images? Images of author's titles are used elsewhere on Wikipedia - what's wrong with this one? Why do you always side with a disruptive user like Damiens.rf and never bother to even talk to people about co-operatively sorting out images? It's just uncooperative behaviour all round and it's not right. It's no wonder I don't want to edit here any more. Reply here. INTGAFW ( talk) 21:24, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
Hello, Angr. I just found a problem with interwiki links in the protected template {{ Rh}}. Could you repair it, please, because you are an sysop? Thanks and greetings -- Tlustulimu ( talk) 13:26, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hi Angr! Would you care to take a look at my suggestion at Template talk:Indo-European studies? Thanks -- ἀνυπόδητος ( talk) 17:43, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
Hi Angr, on the TEB728 talk page where you refered me to WP:BOLD, discuss, revert cycle. The revision as protected by TEB728 is non standard. TEB728 wishes not to discuss appropriately. If anyone knows standard knowledge of the English language you, yourself would claim to be such a one. You express no views. That is your perogative. Silly if you ask me. Cya ~ R. T. G 18:44, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
Forgive me for asking you, but could you help out by keeping an eye on two editors (unless one is a sockpuppet) trying to change English-language terminology for this script? They're doing it on the hu.wikipedia.org as well. The roots of this are in a dispute as to what the name should be in the UCS. See the history as well. Thanks! -- Evertype· ✆ 22:11, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
For your vote at Roman Catholic Church. I am sorry to inform you that we failed FAC but will again be at peer review in a few weeks to sort things out. Hopefully we will make it through next time. We will be contacting all supporters and opposers of the article when we open the next peer review to hopefully get all issues addressed and hashed out before the next FAC try. Thanks again for your time and attention to this important article. NancyHeise talk 01:14, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
Hello. Wandering the wiki I came across a comment on the Manchester talk page mentioning that the IPA was wrong, reflecting a West Country accent which seemed slightly bizarre. The article being protected, but this not seeming to have been part of any disputes I could see, and nobody having replied to this person, I logged in for the first time in ages, and probably the last time in a while too :) to sort it out, since it did seem rather strange. Having done that, I finally managed to find the edit where it was changed and saw it was you. And your edit summary, and knowing you, made me think you probably had a very good reason. So now I'm worried I broke some subtle thing you did, although making it rhotic seemed strange.
So yeah, just a heads-up that I changed it and an apology if I've screwed something up. :-/ Skittle ( talk) 23:19, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
Hey. There are lots of films called Oedipus Rex listed on the imdb. DionysosProteus ( talk) 15:26, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
Hi, I believe that a conversation conducted via edit summaries is not very fruitful. The Request for Comment touches on two areas: (1) Biographies of Living Persons (BLP) because Bernard Lewis is alive; and (2) Language and linguistics because this particular dispute concerns the translation of a particular use of the French word "condamn´e" into English. I would have thought that my explanation that translation is applied linguistics is fairly uncontroversial, but if you disagree then please let me know here or on my Talk page.-- Goodmorningworld ( talk) 23:59, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
All issues related to a topic area, even if about the article title or inclusion of images, go in the section for that topic area. If you are not certain in which area an issue belongs, pick the one that's closest, or inquire at the help desk.
Anybody home?-- Goodmorningworld ( talk) 13:48, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
Hi, Angr. This is a friendly notice to inform you that a category on which you commented Category:Anti-semitic people has been nominated for deletion. The conversation is located here. Regards, Aramgar ( talk) 17:39, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
...or are you just especially attentive and nice? -- Cheers, Deborahjay ( talk) 14:42, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
Per your previous question, I asked a priest at our church who is also a university professor, he said it is at the pastor's discretion whether or not to offer the Eucharist under "both species". NancyHeise talk 18:40, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
The only reason that Tenmei ( talk · contribs) put the three templates to the article and "redirect" page is the hospital's name related to Yonsei, not the content of the article itself. So RFC for language is I think a fit one.-- Caspian blue 16:10, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
This is the sequence of edits which are wrongly described as harassment. A simple question about the need for a credible citation consistent with WP:V, is twisted into a Gordian Knot for which I am not to be blamed:
PROBLEM:
Caspian blue alone deserves to be held accountable for disingenuous complaints which
Caspian blue has created.
QUESTION: What about the initial RfC issue? Without credible citations supporting the use of the explicit phrase "
Yonsei Severance Hospital," is it not "trolling" and not disruptive to delete the unsourced phrase after repeatedly asking for compliance with
WP:V?
I do not know how to address this needlessly complicated mess. -- Tenmei ( talk) 06:14, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
Hello. I'm not sure what content was under Chondalwood, Lapaliiya, Pirate Isles, Ruathym, and Tortured Land when you deleted them; since then a redirect has been placed on each. If it was not copyvio, could you please restore the edit history for these? Thanks!
Also, would you be able to restore the edit history of Storm Silverhand in a similar manner? If you like, you can redirect that one to List of Forgotten Realms characters. Thanks! :) BOZ ( talk) 16:22, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
I'm pretty annoyed by your closing of this image discussion. You obviously didn't read the rationale even though I asked you to - that image met the NFCC; I even fixed the rationale to make it do that better. Why can't you be more co-operative in sorting out images? Images of author's titles are used elsewhere on Wikipedia - what's wrong with this one? Why do you always side with a disruptive user like Damiens.rf and never bother to even talk to people about co-operatively sorting out images? It's just uncooperative behaviour all round and it's not right. It's no wonder I don't want to edit here any more. Reply here. INTGAFW ( talk) 21:24, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
Hello, Angr. I just found a problem with interwiki links in the protected template {{ Rh}}. Could you repair it, please, because you are an sysop? Thanks and greetings -- Tlustulimu ( talk) 13:26, 26 November 2008 (UTC)