Please read wp:v and wp:rs. Slatersteven ( talk) 12:22, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
It was the phamasutical industry that told government and health care administrators that Tamiflue gave good levels of protection against Sars, as it turns out they falsified the trial results.
Watch Statin Wars on the Carbs down under the YouTube channel, what is needed is independent funding of health care research and clinical trials. Magic.Mike63 ( talk) 13:17, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
Why does that mean he is spreading misinformation? Magic.Mike63 ( talk) 13:35, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
Which reminds me
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in COVID-19, broadly construed. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Slatersteven ( talk) 14:05, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
Please read wp:v and wp:rs. Slatersteven ( talk) 12:22, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
It was the phamasutical industry that told government and health care administrators that Tamiflue gave good levels of protection against Sars, as it turns out they falsified the trial results.
Watch Statin Wars on the Carbs down under the YouTube channel, what is needed is independent funding of health care research and clinical trials. Magic.Mike63 ( talk) 13:17, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
Why does that mean he is spreading misinformation? Magic.Mike63 ( talk) 13:35, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
Which reminds me
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in COVID-19, broadly construed. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Slatersteven ( talk) 14:05, 16 March 2022 (UTC)