Hello, I'm Admantine123. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Admantine123 ( talk) 17:17, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Atwood machine. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thanks, Framawiki (please notify me when you reply) 08:41, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to add
unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at
Protist, you may be
blocked from editing.
Donald Albury
11:38, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in South Asian social groups. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose contentious topics restrictions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. |
BlackcurrantTea ( talk) 22:12, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Layah50. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Shunga Empire have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. 🛧 Layah50♪🛪 ( 話す? 一緒に飛ぼう!) 00:34, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Maurya Empire, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 01:16, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Chandragupta Maurya, you may be blocked from editing. Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 13:38, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
Hello Magadhahistorian! Your additions to Protist have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 06:31, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
Is that clear? AI generated text as a response is meaningless and a bit insulting. It doesn't suggest that you actually read any of the links or put any thought into your replies. For instance I see no evidence you read the links involving the use of sources as you continue to use sources that are unreliable and/or don't back the text. This doesn't mean all of your sources are unreliable. Look at this one for instance. [1]. Reliable or unreliable, and why? Doug Weller talk 07:25, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
You have continued to use unreliable sources, and you obviously let a chatbot do your talking. It's interesting to compare the bot posts with the kind of English you use on your own, as here and here. See also Doug Weller's use of an AI detector, mentioned above. You have been blocked indefinitely for persistent disruptive editing. You can request unblock from an uninvolved administrator by placing {{unblock|your reason here}} on this page. But be warned: if you use AI to write an unblock appeal, the reviewing admin will be able to tell, and will reject it. Bishonen | tålk 14:54, 16 August 2023 (UTC).
Hello, I'm Admantine123. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Admantine123 ( talk) 17:17, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Atwood machine. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thanks, Framawiki (please notify me when you reply) 08:41, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to add
unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at
Protist, you may be
blocked from editing.
Donald Albury
11:38, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in South Asian social groups. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose contentious topics restrictions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. |
BlackcurrantTea ( talk) 22:12, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Layah50. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Shunga Empire have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. 🛧 Layah50♪🛪 ( 話す? 一緒に飛ぼう!) 00:34, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Maurya Empire, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 01:16, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Chandragupta Maurya, you may be blocked from editing. Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 13:38, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
Hello Magadhahistorian! Your additions to Protist have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 06:31, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
Is that clear? AI generated text as a response is meaningless and a bit insulting. It doesn't suggest that you actually read any of the links or put any thought into your replies. For instance I see no evidence you read the links involving the use of sources as you continue to use sources that are unreliable and/or don't back the text. This doesn't mean all of your sources are unreliable. Look at this one for instance. [1]. Reliable or unreliable, and why? Doug Weller talk 07:25, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
You have continued to use unreliable sources, and you obviously let a chatbot do your talking. It's interesting to compare the bot posts with the kind of English you use on your own, as here and here. See also Doug Weller's use of an AI detector, mentioned above. You have been blocked indefinitely for persistent disruptive editing. You can request unblock from an uninvolved administrator by placing {{unblock|your reason here}} on this page. But be warned: if you use AI to write an unblock appeal, the reviewing admin will be able to tell, and will reject it. Bishonen | tålk 14:54, 16 August 2023 (UTC).