This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Please help me understand this whole ETV Network set of pages. I saw a bunch of moves, some reverted, some deleted, some apparently half-completed and nothing seeming to tie out correctly. All of the pages I looked at had some longevity so we don't want to leave the pages empty or we risk breaking inbound links.
Unfortunately, the Wikipedia servers started acting up during the research and then got worse so I couldn't ask for an explanation until now. Things seem to have settled down some, though. So what needs to be done and how do we make sure that nothing fell through the cracks? Thanks. Rossami (talk) 18:44, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
Hi, please don't delete the page just yet because I'm trying to improve it. I have gathered some more information as well as obtained a high quality photograph of the author. She is a prolific writer who I really think deserves a wikipedia page. There is the Jan Axelson page that I wrote some time back, and that has even less information than Rukhsana Ahmad page for example. I also have exams just around the corner, so please try not to rush me. Thank you for giving me a chance to explain myself. I hope to continue working with you on wikipedia. Regards, Pale blue dot. Pale blue dot ( talk) 07:39, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
Good job - hot on the trail of the STS-134 reschedule!
Just two things-
1) Info-box Launch Date - day ("2") has no space between NET.
2) The reference cites May 1. I know May 2 has been announced, but where did you get the time of launch?
Thanking you in advance for the information, SalineBrain ( talk) 17:26, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
The closure of the AfD did not box the title; I am unsure of how to correct this, and am reading your contibs as having closed, so I'm bringing this to your attention rather than a help request at the talk page. Dru of Id ( talk) 22:28, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
Please provide details about where the article does not use a formal tone, thanks Keizers ( talk) 18:00, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
Please consider reopening this AFD, I beleive it was closed a bit soon. The references mentioned (which have been added to the article) are questionable. The references provided appear to be the result of a "lets find the name mentioned in Google News hit" with little regard to whether the subject of this article is the focus of the reference. If the AFD were reopened, this could be discussed among participating editors in more detail. Thanks for the consideration.-- RadioFan ( talk) 21:46, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your help with the vital work of patrolling new pages. I noticed that you are not marking some of the pages you've reviewed as patrolled. Please do remember to click the 'mark this page as patrolled' link at the bottom of the new page if you have performed the standard patrolling tasks. Where appropriate, doing so saves time and work by informing fellow patrollers of your review of the page, so that they do not duplicate efforts. Thanks again for volunteering your time at the new pages patrol project. gz33 ( talk) 13:29, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
Hello RadioFan; I'd like to thank you for the advice you gave me on my talk page: it is really appreciated! I was a bit hesitant to agree to be interviewed (I was actually thinking about declining to participate). Your words have helped me make up my mind and, for that, again, I want to thank you. See you around! Salvio Let's talk about it! 16:00, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:KGRP logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:38, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
Hi RadioFan. Thank you for your work on patrolling new pages and tagging for speedy deletion. I'm just letting you know that I declined your deletion request for Rebecca Garfein, a page that you tagged for speedy deletion, because the criterion you used or the reason you gave does not cover this kind of page. Please take a moment to look at the suggested tasks for patrollers and review the criteria for speedy deletion. Particularly, the section covering non-criteria. Such pages are best tagged with proposed deletion, proposed deletion for biographies of living persons, or sent to the appropriate deletion discussion. Catfish Jim & the soapdish 22:00, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
Third party Information on this school with the information herein are from The Atlantic City Press articles as well as The Casino Journal in New Jersey(The New Jersey Casino Journal has been bought out and older articles are not available on their web site.). These articles predated the years available when they were archived for online viewing. This information can be gleaned from these publications microfilms. Please advise. Thanks' ~isitmeto~ —Preceding unsigned comment added by Isitme2 ( talk • contribs) 15:58, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Space Talk. Since you had some involvement with the Space Talk redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Student7 ( talk) 21:51, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
I think you may have judged the book by the title--turns out its a major title--NY best seller & therefore notable, as a trivial search in just google news shows. . Next time, pleasefirst look for sources, & if not found, only then nominate for deletion. See WP:BEFORE. DGG ( talk ) 17:08, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
Hey. The AfD page got archived and I saw this was still open, so I just moved it to a new page. If there's no comments in a couple days I'll go ahead and close it, since as you say consensus is pretty clear. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 20:35, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:WILW logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 04:01, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
Sounds great!. I've left a couple of comments on this at Wikipedia talk:Meetup/Raleigh 2.-- Pharos ( talk) 20:08, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
heads up for you, you forgot to place a notification on user:Cxdantes's talk page, i took care of it for you kthxbai Keastes know thyself 08:42, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
Hi RadioFan - looked as hard as I could but couldn't find anything to get the article over the WP:GNG, but that's just my efforts. Gets 14 600 GHits, so it's not like it's completely obscure. I'm leaning towards an AfD - your thoughts? -- Shirt58 ( talk) 08:54, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Martins Creek Elementary Middle. Users are expected to
collaborate with others and avoid editing
disruptively.
In particular, the three-revert rule states that:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. TerriersFan ( talk) 18:11, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
I have removed the {{ prod}} tag from John Smith (businessman), which you proposed for deletion. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the {{ prod}} template back to the article. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! Catfish Jim & the soapdish 08:32, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
Hi RadioFan. Can you create a Wikipedia:Meetup/Raleigh 3 with the Wiknic info?-- Pharos ( talk) 19:38, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ecosse Heretic Titanium is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ecosse Heretic Titanium until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Dennis Bratland ( talk) 15:24, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
RadioFan -
I am the owner of GingerBread Lane. I had someone create the wiki page for me, and she did a terrible job. On the flip side she does great art work for the covers of my brochures and signs each fall. Anyways, I am presently paying a web designer who is very versed in wiki to create a new wiki entry that you know, looks like a wiki page. There are presently 7 valid reference points on there. I understand in your opinion that some of them are by the place that hosted the exhibit, but 5 are not. 5 of them are valid news sources, Pittsburgh Tribune Review, Pittsburgh Post Gazette, Washington Post, Martha Stewart Living. There used to be more. I have learned that news stories posted online dont last forever. Now I know that. I am presently looking for a few more. When I find them, they will be live. In short, since you have influence in all things wiki, can I ask the piece not be deleted whilst the web designer finishes it. It is visited by over 100,000 annually, that is actually quite remarkable, and deserving of a wiki page. I am not having this done for self promotion. I just think an exhibit of this size, with this sort of foot traffic, needs a wiki entry. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kcdcchef ( talk • contribs) 04:14, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
Hello, I made some comments about this article on the talk page of MelanieN. Your opinion would be welcomed. Cullen328 ( talk) 18:49, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
You marked the page OneTravel for speedy deletion. The talk page is now gone so I am looking for an explanation here as to why it was marked as such. After issues of notoriety were raised, edits included several sources from reputable sites including Gadling/AOL. Can you please tell me what more needs to be done? Thank you. MikeTravels ( talk) 20:35, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
Hello, I have removed the 'W4' commercial reference to LEONARDI FRAMEWORK, which is indeed an open source software platform. As such this technology contributes to and is recognized by larger notable European aceademic projects such as Serenoa. Verifiable references to this extent will soon be added. Please reconsider inclusion of this article in Wikipedia. Many thanks Kristeen2011 ( talk) 09:29, 20 May 2011 (UTC)Kristeen2011
Hello RadioFan. I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of Gongju National University of Education, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Contains sufficient content to be a stub. Thank you. Logan Talk Contributions 03:25, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
Can you look at it one more time? Cirt put the wrong version up. Right one is up now. 19 sources. The last 5 sources are new ones completely independent of first 13. All link to different news pieces. Thank you for your time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kcdcchef ( talk • contribs) 23:19, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
Sure. I am it's owner. No doubt about that. I will not deny that. I wanted a wiki piece done on it based on the reccomendation of the editor of the Pittsburgh Tribune Review. His reccomendation was that it is a newsworthy event and newsworthy events are on wiki, people searching wiki sometimes stumble across things like GBL. I can direct you to hundreds if not thousands of pieces on wiki that arent to dis-similar. I am not using wiki to promote. I am using wiki to make it an encylopedia entry, which, is what wiki is. Kcdcchef ( talk) 00:02, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
I will be very clear with you on this one more time. I did not write it. I passed on the critique and feedback from wiki admins and a wiki employee to a third party. Was advised by wiki admins to have third party do it. IN fact, I have never edited the peice one time. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Kcdcchef (
talk •
contribs) 00:25, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
I was advised by the admins and wiki to stay out of the AFD this time. I was told sometimes an AFD can get nothing but delete votes and stay live. I am however talking to the no votes via talk like this. And again, dangit!!!! I do wish you would be more objective about it! There are a ton of wiki pieces that are far less notable, just looked at numerous pieces on local crap festivals for one. And theykeep their wiki piece. Now that you are clear I didnt write the dang thing, can you please reconsider? You are a very respected wikipedian from what I can tell. Kcdcchef ( talk) 00:37, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
Hi, RadioFan! Please let me express my respect and admiration for all that you have done and continue to do for Wikipedia. In that spirit, I am going to make the same suggestion to you that I made to Kcdcchef: You need to chill out, back down, and let the discussion take its course. Your suggestion that there was some kind of meatpuppetry going on in this case makes no sense to me, and seems a bit over the line. I think you may have allowed yourself to be carried away by your passion and frustration over this admittedly marginal article, which really isn't worth this much of your attention. OK? Still friends? -- MelanieN ( talk) 01:32, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:WBOG logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Ronhjones (Talk) 22:13, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
Hello RadioFan, I want to commend you for all your thoughtful contributions to the Paganistan deletion debate. Though I opposed you for administrator back in March, I think you have done a really good job here, and I wish you well. Cullen328 ( talk) 14:45, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
Just a heads up that I decline A3 CSD tags on the boat load of articles created by User:Tsuchiya Hikaru. You can find the articles listed in the editor's talk page history. I declined the deletions due to clear presence of article content. While the articles are stubs in need of references, content was quite evident (however scant). Please feel free to contact me if you have questions. Best regards, Cind. amuse 08:06, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
Hi RadioFan. Just to let you know, I removed the prod you placed. You wrote that there was no significant third-party coverage, but multiple sources were fairly easily found through Google News. Paul Erik (talk) (contribs) 04:22, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Please help me understand this whole ETV Network set of pages. I saw a bunch of moves, some reverted, some deleted, some apparently half-completed and nothing seeming to tie out correctly. All of the pages I looked at had some longevity so we don't want to leave the pages empty or we risk breaking inbound links.
Unfortunately, the Wikipedia servers started acting up during the research and then got worse so I couldn't ask for an explanation until now. Things seem to have settled down some, though. So what needs to be done and how do we make sure that nothing fell through the cracks? Thanks. Rossami (talk) 18:44, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
Hi, please don't delete the page just yet because I'm trying to improve it. I have gathered some more information as well as obtained a high quality photograph of the author. She is a prolific writer who I really think deserves a wikipedia page. There is the Jan Axelson page that I wrote some time back, and that has even less information than Rukhsana Ahmad page for example. I also have exams just around the corner, so please try not to rush me. Thank you for giving me a chance to explain myself. I hope to continue working with you on wikipedia. Regards, Pale blue dot. Pale blue dot ( talk) 07:39, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
Good job - hot on the trail of the STS-134 reschedule!
Just two things-
1) Info-box Launch Date - day ("2") has no space between NET.
2) The reference cites May 1. I know May 2 has been announced, but where did you get the time of launch?
Thanking you in advance for the information, SalineBrain ( talk) 17:26, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
The closure of the AfD did not box the title; I am unsure of how to correct this, and am reading your contibs as having closed, so I'm bringing this to your attention rather than a help request at the talk page. Dru of Id ( talk) 22:28, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
Please provide details about where the article does not use a formal tone, thanks Keizers ( talk) 18:00, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
Please consider reopening this AFD, I beleive it was closed a bit soon. The references mentioned (which have been added to the article) are questionable. The references provided appear to be the result of a "lets find the name mentioned in Google News hit" with little regard to whether the subject of this article is the focus of the reference. If the AFD were reopened, this could be discussed among participating editors in more detail. Thanks for the consideration.-- RadioFan ( talk) 21:46, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your help with the vital work of patrolling new pages. I noticed that you are not marking some of the pages you've reviewed as patrolled. Please do remember to click the 'mark this page as patrolled' link at the bottom of the new page if you have performed the standard patrolling tasks. Where appropriate, doing so saves time and work by informing fellow patrollers of your review of the page, so that they do not duplicate efforts. Thanks again for volunteering your time at the new pages patrol project. gz33 ( talk) 13:29, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
Hello RadioFan; I'd like to thank you for the advice you gave me on my talk page: it is really appreciated! I was a bit hesitant to agree to be interviewed (I was actually thinking about declining to participate). Your words have helped me make up my mind and, for that, again, I want to thank you. See you around! Salvio Let's talk about it! 16:00, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:KGRP logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:38, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
Hi RadioFan. Thank you for your work on patrolling new pages and tagging for speedy deletion. I'm just letting you know that I declined your deletion request for Rebecca Garfein, a page that you tagged for speedy deletion, because the criterion you used or the reason you gave does not cover this kind of page. Please take a moment to look at the suggested tasks for patrollers and review the criteria for speedy deletion. Particularly, the section covering non-criteria. Such pages are best tagged with proposed deletion, proposed deletion for biographies of living persons, or sent to the appropriate deletion discussion. Catfish Jim & the soapdish 22:00, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
Third party Information on this school with the information herein are from The Atlantic City Press articles as well as The Casino Journal in New Jersey(The New Jersey Casino Journal has been bought out and older articles are not available on their web site.). These articles predated the years available when they were archived for online viewing. This information can be gleaned from these publications microfilms. Please advise. Thanks' ~isitmeto~ —Preceding unsigned comment added by Isitme2 ( talk • contribs) 15:58, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Space Talk. Since you had some involvement with the Space Talk redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Student7 ( talk) 21:51, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
I think you may have judged the book by the title--turns out its a major title--NY best seller & therefore notable, as a trivial search in just google news shows. . Next time, pleasefirst look for sources, & if not found, only then nominate for deletion. See WP:BEFORE. DGG ( talk ) 17:08, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
Hey. The AfD page got archived and I saw this was still open, so I just moved it to a new page. If there's no comments in a couple days I'll go ahead and close it, since as you say consensus is pretty clear. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 20:35, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:WILW logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 04:01, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
Sounds great!. I've left a couple of comments on this at Wikipedia talk:Meetup/Raleigh 2.-- Pharos ( talk) 20:08, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
heads up for you, you forgot to place a notification on user:Cxdantes's talk page, i took care of it for you kthxbai Keastes know thyself 08:42, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
Hi RadioFan - looked as hard as I could but couldn't find anything to get the article over the WP:GNG, but that's just my efforts. Gets 14 600 GHits, so it's not like it's completely obscure. I'm leaning towards an AfD - your thoughts? -- Shirt58 ( talk) 08:54, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Martins Creek Elementary Middle. Users are expected to
collaborate with others and avoid editing
disruptively.
In particular, the three-revert rule states that:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. TerriersFan ( talk) 18:11, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
I have removed the {{ prod}} tag from John Smith (businessman), which you proposed for deletion. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the {{ prod}} template back to the article. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! Catfish Jim & the soapdish 08:32, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
Hi RadioFan. Can you create a Wikipedia:Meetup/Raleigh 3 with the Wiknic info?-- Pharos ( talk) 19:38, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ecosse Heretic Titanium is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ecosse Heretic Titanium until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Dennis Bratland ( talk) 15:24, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
RadioFan -
I am the owner of GingerBread Lane. I had someone create the wiki page for me, and she did a terrible job. On the flip side she does great art work for the covers of my brochures and signs each fall. Anyways, I am presently paying a web designer who is very versed in wiki to create a new wiki entry that you know, looks like a wiki page. There are presently 7 valid reference points on there. I understand in your opinion that some of them are by the place that hosted the exhibit, but 5 are not. 5 of them are valid news sources, Pittsburgh Tribune Review, Pittsburgh Post Gazette, Washington Post, Martha Stewart Living. There used to be more. I have learned that news stories posted online dont last forever. Now I know that. I am presently looking for a few more. When I find them, they will be live. In short, since you have influence in all things wiki, can I ask the piece not be deleted whilst the web designer finishes it. It is visited by over 100,000 annually, that is actually quite remarkable, and deserving of a wiki page. I am not having this done for self promotion. I just think an exhibit of this size, with this sort of foot traffic, needs a wiki entry. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kcdcchef ( talk • contribs) 04:14, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
Hello, I made some comments about this article on the talk page of MelanieN. Your opinion would be welcomed. Cullen328 ( talk) 18:49, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
You marked the page OneTravel for speedy deletion. The talk page is now gone so I am looking for an explanation here as to why it was marked as such. After issues of notoriety were raised, edits included several sources from reputable sites including Gadling/AOL. Can you please tell me what more needs to be done? Thank you. MikeTravels ( talk) 20:35, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
Hello, I have removed the 'W4' commercial reference to LEONARDI FRAMEWORK, which is indeed an open source software platform. As such this technology contributes to and is recognized by larger notable European aceademic projects such as Serenoa. Verifiable references to this extent will soon be added. Please reconsider inclusion of this article in Wikipedia. Many thanks Kristeen2011 ( talk) 09:29, 20 May 2011 (UTC)Kristeen2011
Hello RadioFan. I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of Gongju National University of Education, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Contains sufficient content to be a stub. Thank you. Logan Talk Contributions 03:25, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
Can you look at it one more time? Cirt put the wrong version up. Right one is up now. 19 sources. The last 5 sources are new ones completely independent of first 13. All link to different news pieces. Thank you for your time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kcdcchef ( talk • contribs) 23:19, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
Sure. I am it's owner. No doubt about that. I will not deny that. I wanted a wiki piece done on it based on the reccomendation of the editor of the Pittsburgh Tribune Review. His reccomendation was that it is a newsworthy event and newsworthy events are on wiki, people searching wiki sometimes stumble across things like GBL. I can direct you to hundreds if not thousands of pieces on wiki that arent to dis-similar. I am not using wiki to promote. I am using wiki to make it an encylopedia entry, which, is what wiki is. Kcdcchef ( talk) 00:02, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
I will be very clear with you on this one more time. I did not write it. I passed on the critique and feedback from wiki admins and a wiki employee to a third party. Was advised by wiki admins to have third party do it. IN fact, I have never edited the peice one time. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Kcdcchef (
talk •
contribs) 00:25, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
I was advised by the admins and wiki to stay out of the AFD this time. I was told sometimes an AFD can get nothing but delete votes and stay live. I am however talking to the no votes via talk like this. And again, dangit!!!! I do wish you would be more objective about it! There are a ton of wiki pieces that are far less notable, just looked at numerous pieces on local crap festivals for one. And theykeep their wiki piece. Now that you are clear I didnt write the dang thing, can you please reconsider? You are a very respected wikipedian from what I can tell. Kcdcchef ( talk) 00:37, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
Hi, RadioFan! Please let me express my respect and admiration for all that you have done and continue to do for Wikipedia. In that spirit, I am going to make the same suggestion to you that I made to Kcdcchef: You need to chill out, back down, and let the discussion take its course. Your suggestion that there was some kind of meatpuppetry going on in this case makes no sense to me, and seems a bit over the line. I think you may have allowed yourself to be carried away by your passion and frustration over this admittedly marginal article, which really isn't worth this much of your attention. OK? Still friends? -- MelanieN ( talk) 01:32, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:WBOG logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Ronhjones (Talk) 22:13, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
Hello RadioFan, I want to commend you for all your thoughtful contributions to the Paganistan deletion debate. Though I opposed you for administrator back in March, I think you have done a really good job here, and I wish you well. Cullen328 ( talk) 14:45, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
Just a heads up that I decline A3 CSD tags on the boat load of articles created by User:Tsuchiya Hikaru. You can find the articles listed in the editor's talk page history. I declined the deletions due to clear presence of article content. While the articles are stubs in need of references, content was quite evident (however scant). Please feel free to contact me if you have questions. Best regards, Cind. amuse 08:06, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
Hi RadioFan. Just to let you know, I removed the prod you placed. You wrote that there was no significant third-party coverage, but multiple sources were fairly easily found through Google News. Paul Erik (talk) (contribs) 04:22, 31 May 2011 (UTC)