![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jonathan Hill, Baron Hill of Oareford, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Creation. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:57, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:50, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:55, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:06, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:22, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:14, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
John Byng, 5th Viscount Torrington may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 01:49, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Re this edit: right is redundant - thumb implies right alignment. Giving an explicit width is strongly deprecated because it overrides the user's thumbnail preference. However you are encouraged to use upright - see explanation. — RHaworth ( talk · contribs) 13:51, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bodrum Castle, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Spanish, Grand Master and Knight of Malta. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:09, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:31, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Peerage of Scotland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Peer. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:16, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Alan Yarrow, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ward. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:14, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar |
For your article on Luc de La Barre de Nanteuil! gidonb ( talk) 19:48, 9 October 2014 (UTC) |
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:48, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:56, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi. There is no confirmation for Federica Mogherini's orders both on Quirinale.it and in official database of the Russian President's staff Department for state awards. You added respective templates in several articles, but did not insert your sources. Would you like to mention them? In other case I'll have to remove your edits at least in Russian Wikipedia.-- Vigoshi ( talk) 16:12, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:21, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi there! Thank you for
your contributions to
Wikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled " Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
I noticed your recent edit to Naga Munchetty does not have an edit summary.Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Edit summary content is visible in:
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Dl2000 ( talk) 21:11, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 13:57, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 16:57, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Patrick Adamson may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 02:24, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Lord Mayor of London may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 20:51, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:20, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
I see we are crossing.. Come on don't be naughty, look at Clacton by-election, 2014 to compare some of the wording. While I find the decision to strip Rochester of its historic city status ludicrous the best we can do at the moment is to use the wording on the lead of Rochester, Kent which says:
It is a principle of Wikipedia that we support each edit with a reference so the text can be verified. I think that on a sensitive page we should explain proposed changes on the talk page to gather comment before we attempt to be bold.
As to Emily's tweets we have to be careful of WP:BLP too. Anyone who was sent to canvass in Albatross Ave was tempting fate- particularly as the most common comment from visiting MPs was I thought Rochester was alot flatter than this!
Thanks for taking an interest- am I likely to be able to buy you a drink at any Wiki-Meetup anytime soon? -- Clem Rutter ( talk) 00:07, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:23, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:14, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:03, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:19, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Gravesend may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 17:15, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
From MOS:JOBTITLES
Offices, titles, and positions such as president, king, emperor, pope, bishop, abbot, executive director are common nouns and therefore should be in lower case when used generically: "Mitterrand was the French president" or "There were many presidents at the meeting." They are capitalized only in the following cases:
When followed by a person's name to form a title, i.e. when they can be considered to have become part of the name: President Nixon, not president Nixon
When a title is used to refer to a specific and obvious person as a substitute for their name, e.g. the Queen, not the queen, referring to Elizabeth II
When the correct formal title is treated as a proper name (e.g. King of France; it is correct to write Louis XVI was King of France but Louis XVI was the French king)
Please follow these principles in future and spare yourself and other editors from further unnecessary conflict and time wasting. Thank you. Anglicanus ( talk) 12:54, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:03, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
Ban me forever if you so wish - M Mabelina ( talk) 00:14, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:38, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
Please review the unacceptable comments not as yet withdrawn (despite the said party promising to do so) about being INEDUCABLE - M
Mabelina (
talk)
00:30, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
PS. Wikipedians should be more reliable than this...
<ref>{{
cite book|…}}</ref>
reference to a specific entry in Burke's Peerage is completely acceptable. Further, but with the greatest reluctance, I will accept you adding a link such as
Thomas Osborne in Burke's Peerage. Note that you must: a) convert any spaces in the URL as shown in your browser's address bar into %20
and the displayed text must be something meaningful such as the Thomas Osborne in Burke's Peerage above rather than an uninformative www.burkespeerage.com. —
RHaworth (
talk ·
contribs)
14:13, 27 August 2015 (UTC)Links to the Burke's peerage article are, if anything, worse than linking to Burke's home page. I will consider them grounds for blocking. To spell that out more clearly: its use in a reference such as is used in Michael Birkett, 2nd Baron Birkett is just about acceptable. But adding a "see also" as here is utterly pointless. — RHaworth ( talk · contribs) 12:53, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Alan Beith may have broken the
syntax by modifying 6 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 15:04, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Duke of Abrantes, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Don and Dukedom. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:14, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Graham Robb, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chevalier. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:30, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
You've already been informed multiple times that academic qualifications are not used as post-nominals in opening sentences. Please stop! Anglicanus ( talk) 23:51, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 14:17, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
You've already been informed multiple times that academic qualifications are not used as post-nominals in opening sentences. Please stop! Anglicanus ( talk) 23:51, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 14:17, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:10, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
Is User:AusLondonder in violation of Wiki policy? www.parliament.uk clearly states that Corbyn is a Privy Councillor - could he be sanctioned before further reversions? Many thanks M Mabelina ( talk) 01:54, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
I have now seen this: User:Mabelina, you are now engaging in an WP:EDITWAR and making a disputed change with no consensus. AusLondonder (talk) 02:21, 23 September 2015 (UTC) - gov.uk states in Law what I have been saying - so please refer AusLondonder to the appropriate authorities. Many thanks M Mabelina ( talk) 02:24, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
Is this good Wiki practice to be threatened with WP:EDITWAR by those who don't know about the subject concerned? Of course, please feel free to bow to local pressure, but should you find time to review my edits you might think otherwise? Is AusLondonder's behaviour acceptable according to Wiki's codes of conduct? Many thanks M Mabelina ( talk) 02:32, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi there
AusLondonder - I should hope that we both have no axe to grind & simply wish for
Wikipedia to be
up-to-speed with its info.
Since you made some disagreeable suggestion above - namely, you allege "Wrong on many, many counts", which despite your apparent certainty, is utterly incorrect - I thought it as well to put the matter straight about
Corbyn and his
privy councillorship. First, he HAS been appointed a
privy councillor qv.
http://www.parliament.uk/about/mps-and-lords/principal/government-opposition/; it is he (
Jeremy Corbyn) who wishes for the whole issue to be mired in confusion (successfully so far) ably abetted by one
BBC
interview, wherein
Laura Kuenssberg qv.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-34275164 inaccurately described the ceremony through an apparent lack of knowledge; this put Corbyn "on the spot" but also provided a ready-made
get-out clause by perpetuating a myth which seemed to have stuck until recently. Second, from an unexpected source,
The Lord Prescott, the public learned on BBC's
Sunday Politics that Privy Counsellors do not "kneel", they "hop" - Prescott's description of the
ceremony was indeed quite witty! qv.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-34373851.
I see on your
Talk page that you rejoice in correcting many so-called BLP violations, so perhaps you would be so kind as to correct these matters accordingly? Many thanks M
Mabelina (
talk)
21:34, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jonathan Hill, Baron Hill of Oareford, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Creation. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:57, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:50, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:55, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:06, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:22, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:14, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
John Byng, 5th Viscount Torrington may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 01:49, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Re this edit: right is redundant - thumb implies right alignment. Giving an explicit width is strongly deprecated because it overrides the user's thumbnail preference. However you are encouraged to use upright - see explanation. — RHaworth ( talk · contribs) 13:51, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bodrum Castle, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Spanish, Grand Master and Knight of Malta. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:09, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:31, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Peerage of Scotland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Peer. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:16, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Alan Yarrow, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ward. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:14, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar |
For your article on Luc de La Barre de Nanteuil! gidonb ( talk) 19:48, 9 October 2014 (UTC) |
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:48, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:56, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi. There is no confirmation for Federica Mogherini's orders both on Quirinale.it and in official database of the Russian President's staff Department for state awards. You added respective templates in several articles, but did not insert your sources. Would you like to mention them? In other case I'll have to remove your edits at least in Russian Wikipedia.-- Vigoshi ( talk) 16:12, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:21, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi there! Thank you for
your contributions to
Wikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled " Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
I noticed your recent edit to Naga Munchetty does not have an edit summary.Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Edit summary content is visible in:
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Dl2000 ( talk) 21:11, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 13:57, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 16:57, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Patrick Adamson may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 02:24, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Lord Mayor of London may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 20:51, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:20, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
I see we are crossing.. Come on don't be naughty, look at Clacton by-election, 2014 to compare some of the wording. While I find the decision to strip Rochester of its historic city status ludicrous the best we can do at the moment is to use the wording on the lead of Rochester, Kent which says:
It is a principle of Wikipedia that we support each edit with a reference so the text can be verified. I think that on a sensitive page we should explain proposed changes on the talk page to gather comment before we attempt to be bold.
As to Emily's tweets we have to be careful of WP:BLP too. Anyone who was sent to canvass in Albatross Ave was tempting fate- particularly as the most common comment from visiting MPs was I thought Rochester was alot flatter than this!
Thanks for taking an interest- am I likely to be able to buy you a drink at any Wiki-Meetup anytime soon? -- Clem Rutter ( talk) 00:07, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:23, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:14, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:03, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:19, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Gravesend may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 17:15, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
From MOS:JOBTITLES
Offices, titles, and positions such as president, king, emperor, pope, bishop, abbot, executive director are common nouns and therefore should be in lower case when used generically: "Mitterrand was the French president" or "There were many presidents at the meeting." They are capitalized only in the following cases:
When followed by a person's name to form a title, i.e. when they can be considered to have become part of the name: President Nixon, not president Nixon
When a title is used to refer to a specific and obvious person as a substitute for their name, e.g. the Queen, not the queen, referring to Elizabeth II
When the correct formal title is treated as a proper name (e.g. King of France; it is correct to write Louis XVI was King of France but Louis XVI was the French king)
Please follow these principles in future and spare yourself and other editors from further unnecessary conflict and time wasting. Thank you. Anglicanus ( talk) 12:54, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:03, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
Ban me forever if you so wish - M Mabelina ( talk) 00:14, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:38, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
Please review the unacceptable comments not as yet withdrawn (despite the said party promising to do so) about being INEDUCABLE - M
Mabelina (
talk)
00:30, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
PS. Wikipedians should be more reliable than this...
<ref>{{
cite book|…}}</ref>
reference to a specific entry in Burke's Peerage is completely acceptable. Further, but with the greatest reluctance, I will accept you adding a link such as
Thomas Osborne in Burke's Peerage. Note that you must: a) convert any spaces in the URL as shown in your browser's address bar into %20
and the displayed text must be something meaningful such as the Thomas Osborne in Burke's Peerage above rather than an uninformative www.burkespeerage.com. —
RHaworth (
talk ·
contribs)
14:13, 27 August 2015 (UTC)Links to the Burke's peerage article are, if anything, worse than linking to Burke's home page. I will consider them grounds for blocking. To spell that out more clearly: its use in a reference such as is used in Michael Birkett, 2nd Baron Birkett is just about acceptable. But adding a "see also" as here is utterly pointless. — RHaworth ( talk · contribs) 12:53, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Alan Beith may have broken the
syntax by modifying 6 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 15:04, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Duke of Abrantes, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Don and Dukedom. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:14, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Graham Robb, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chevalier. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:30, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
You've already been informed multiple times that academic qualifications are not used as post-nominals in opening sentences. Please stop! Anglicanus ( talk) 23:51, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 14:17, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
You've already been informed multiple times that academic qualifications are not used as post-nominals in opening sentences. Please stop! Anglicanus ( talk) 23:51, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 14:17, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:10, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
Is User:AusLondonder in violation of Wiki policy? www.parliament.uk clearly states that Corbyn is a Privy Councillor - could he be sanctioned before further reversions? Many thanks M Mabelina ( talk) 01:54, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
I have now seen this: User:Mabelina, you are now engaging in an WP:EDITWAR and making a disputed change with no consensus. AusLondonder (talk) 02:21, 23 September 2015 (UTC) - gov.uk states in Law what I have been saying - so please refer AusLondonder to the appropriate authorities. Many thanks M Mabelina ( talk) 02:24, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
Is this good Wiki practice to be threatened with WP:EDITWAR by those who don't know about the subject concerned? Of course, please feel free to bow to local pressure, but should you find time to review my edits you might think otherwise? Is AusLondonder's behaviour acceptable according to Wiki's codes of conduct? Many thanks M Mabelina ( talk) 02:32, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi there
AusLondonder - I should hope that we both have no axe to grind & simply wish for
Wikipedia to be
up-to-speed with its info.
Since you made some disagreeable suggestion above - namely, you allege "Wrong on many, many counts", which despite your apparent certainty, is utterly incorrect - I thought it as well to put the matter straight about
Corbyn and his
privy councillorship. First, he HAS been appointed a
privy councillor qv.
http://www.parliament.uk/about/mps-and-lords/principal/government-opposition/; it is he (
Jeremy Corbyn) who wishes for the whole issue to be mired in confusion (successfully so far) ably abetted by one
BBC
interview, wherein
Laura Kuenssberg qv.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-34275164 inaccurately described the ceremony through an apparent lack of knowledge; this put Corbyn "on the spot" but also provided a ready-made
get-out clause by perpetuating a myth which seemed to have stuck until recently. Second, from an unexpected source,
The Lord Prescott, the public learned on BBC's
Sunday Politics that Privy Counsellors do not "kneel", they "hop" - Prescott's description of the
ceremony was indeed quite witty! qv.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-34373851.
I see on your
Talk page that you rejoice in correcting many so-called BLP violations, so perhaps you would be so kind as to correct these matters accordingly? Many thanks M
Mabelina (
talk)
21:34, 29 September 2015 (UTC)