Hello, MMSS4S, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
- Introduction and Getting started
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! — Masum Ibn Musa Conversation 11:00, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
Nomination of Scott duffy for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Scott duffy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott duffy until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wilbysuffolk (Talk to me!) 19:27, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove
Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in
Articles for deletion debates, as you did with
Scott duffy. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create
consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please
comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a
bot about
this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please
report it.—
cyberbot I
Talk to my owner:Online
16:18, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Hello, MMSS4S. We
welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you have an external relationship with some of the people, places or things
you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a
conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.
All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.
If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:
- Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
- Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
- Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.
Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. SmartSE ( talk) 16:44, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
Ongoing discussion of your edits
Please see Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard#Justin_Lafazan. Thanks SmartSE ( talk) 16:45, 10 July 2015 (UTC) -- Thank you for all the help [User:Smartse|SmartSE]. I appreciate your guidance as I am somewhat new to this. MMSS4S ( talk) 06:47, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
I'm hoping this edit [1] was a mistake. Deleting whole sections because you are named a party is not only inappropriate, but it can get you blocked pretty quick as it is obviously an attempt at avoiding scrutiny. It is also amazingly ineffective because so many of use monitor admin boards for this stuff, even if we don't work that particular board. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 20:54, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
 | This account has been
blocked indefinitely as a
sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is
allowed, but using them for
illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban
may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may
appeal this block by first reading the
guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below.
NeilN
talk to me
13:10, 4 August 2015 (UTC) |
Hello, MMSS4S, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
- Introduction and Getting started
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! — Masum Ibn Musa Conversation 11:00, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
Nomination of Scott duffy for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Scott duffy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott duffy until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wilbysuffolk (Talk to me!) 19:27, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove
Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in
Articles for deletion debates, as you did with
Scott duffy. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create
consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please
comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a
bot about
this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please
report it.—
cyberbot I
Talk to my owner:Online
16:18, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Hello, MMSS4S. We
welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you have an external relationship with some of the people, places or things
you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a
conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.
All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.
If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:
- Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
- Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
- Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.
Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. SmartSE ( talk) 16:44, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
Ongoing discussion of your edits
Please see Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard#Justin_Lafazan. Thanks SmartSE ( talk) 16:45, 10 July 2015 (UTC) -- Thank you for all the help [User:Smartse|SmartSE]. I appreciate your guidance as I am somewhat new to this. MMSS4S ( talk) 06:47, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
I'm hoping this edit [1] was a mistake. Deleting whole sections because you are named a party is not only inappropriate, but it can get you blocked pretty quick as it is obviously an attempt at avoiding scrutiny. It is also amazingly ineffective because so many of use monitor admin boards for this stuff, even if we don't work that particular board. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 20:54, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
|
| This account has been
blocked indefinitely as a
sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is
allowed, but using them for
illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban
may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may
appeal this block by first reading the
guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below.
NeilN
talk to me
13:10, 4 August 2015 (UTC) |