at Koch family might you be able to find a WP:SECONDARY source for the word "invented". it would strengthen the sentence, in my opinion. thanks. - Shootbamboo ( talk) 22:31, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
Hi. I left a note within the section as well. I feel very strongly about this and just want to cover my bases. I don't want to unnecessarily clutter your talk space.
Let's please put this in the existing discussion section, or at least move this new section to a position immediately beneath the original, for the purposes of organization and keeping the original participants in the discussion. I feel very strongly about this. Would you please delete it and move the text, or at least move the section upwards? - Digiphi ( Talk) 19:19, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
how the sections would be arranged
|
---|
==Fundraising and Support Section== all the old content from that stale discussion. ==Trying again on Fundraising and Support== the new, continued discussion. ==Off tocpic "geo-engineering"== whatever the heck they were talking about here. |
And it would look like this in the Table of Contents:
view of the TOC
|
---|
Contents
4. Fundraising and Support Section |
Hey there MBMadmirer, thank you for your contributions. I am a
bot, alerting you that
non-free files are
not allowed in user or talk space. I
removed some files I found on
User:MBMadmirer/Tea Party Movement. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use files to your
user-space drafts or your
talk page.
Thank you, -- DASHBot ( talk) 05:02, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
Hi there, is your 'support' on the tea party movement page for the compromise edit, or for going back to the mediation cabal page? I'm wondering since it's right under North8000's suggestion to return to the cabal page. Thanks. Malke 2010 ( talk) 19:12, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
Hey. About the "Consensus for Lede" section on the discussion page, would you be opposed to moving/having moved your !Vote to the top of the section next to all the other votes? I'm asking some other editors with votes in the middle of the page the same thing. - Digiphi ( Talk) 02:26, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things
you have written about in the article
Koch Industries, you may have a
conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. In specific, your account is used solely to remove unflattering but accurate information and to downplay the link with the TPM. This is in direct violation of policy and may result in your account being permanently blocked. Dylan Flaherty 11:16, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
I have raised the subject of your block at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#MBMadmirer. User:Fred Bauder Talk 18:55, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
at Koch family might you be able to find a WP:SECONDARY source for the word "invented". it would strengthen the sentence, in my opinion. thanks. - Shootbamboo ( talk) 22:31, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
Hi. I left a note within the section as well. I feel very strongly about this and just want to cover my bases. I don't want to unnecessarily clutter your talk space.
Let's please put this in the existing discussion section, or at least move this new section to a position immediately beneath the original, for the purposes of organization and keeping the original participants in the discussion. I feel very strongly about this. Would you please delete it and move the text, or at least move the section upwards? - Digiphi ( Talk) 19:19, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
how the sections would be arranged
|
---|
==Fundraising and Support Section== all the old content from that stale discussion. ==Trying again on Fundraising and Support== the new, continued discussion. ==Off tocpic "geo-engineering"== whatever the heck they were talking about here. |
And it would look like this in the Table of Contents:
view of the TOC
|
---|
Contents
4. Fundraising and Support Section |
Hey there MBMadmirer, thank you for your contributions. I am a
bot, alerting you that
non-free files are
not allowed in user or talk space. I
removed some files I found on
User:MBMadmirer/Tea Party Movement. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use files to your
user-space drafts or your
talk page.
Thank you, -- DASHBot ( talk) 05:02, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
Hi there, is your 'support' on the tea party movement page for the compromise edit, or for going back to the mediation cabal page? I'm wondering since it's right under North8000's suggestion to return to the cabal page. Thanks. Malke 2010 ( talk) 19:12, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
Hey. About the "Consensus for Lede" section on the discussion page, would you be opposed to moving/having moved your !Vote to the top of the section next to all the other votes? I'm asking some other editors with votes in the middle of the page the same thing. - Digiphi ( Talk) 02:26, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things
you have written about in the article
Koch Industries, you may have a
conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. In specific, your account is used solely to remove unflattering but accurate information and to downplay the link with the TPM. This is in direct violation of policy and may result in your account being permanently blocked. Dylan Flaherty 11:16, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
I have raised the subject of your block at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#MBMadmirer. User:Fred Bauder Talk 18:55, 11 March 2011 (UTC)