Thanks for uploading Image:Qehemblem.gif. I notice it currently doesn't have an image copyright tag.
Could you add one to let us know its copyright status? (You can use {{gfdl}} if you release it under the GFDL, or {{fairuse}} if you claim fair use, etc.) If you don't know what any of this means, just let me know where you got the images and I'll tag them for you.
Thanks so much, Zzyzx11 (Talk) 06:09, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
Yep. Cool. (Actually, I think there's a coding problem with the "incumbent succession box" template that isn't present in "succession box", but I'm not good enough at template coding to find it...) Bearcat 01:54, 5 August 2005 (UTC)
Your section "Pages of interest" links "reading". The page "Reading" should not ordinarily be linked directly. If you mean one of the specific meanings of "Reading" (e.g. Reading (activity)), please link the relevant page directly, and if you mean the disambiguation page, please link Reading (disambiguation). I would make the edit myself, but I am unable to discern which meaning is appropriate. Thanks, Duckbill 13:29, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
I have added a "{{
prod}}" template to the article
Alice Porlock, suggesting that it be deleted according to the
proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "
What Wikipedia is not" and
Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the
proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the
speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to
Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.
Propaniac
16:31, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
A template you created,
Template:Queen Elizabeth High School infobox, has been marked for deletion as a deprecated and orphaned template. If, after 14 days, there has been no objection, the template will be deleted. If you wish to object to its deletion, please list your objection
here and feel free to remove the {{
deprecated}}
tag from the template. If you feel the deletion is appropriate, no further action is necessary. Thanks for your attention.
Bryan Derksen (
talk)
04:00, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading Image:Msurjvol3iss1.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:
Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI ( talk) 20:55, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
Hello M87! Thank you for your contributions. I am a
bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is an
Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add
reliable,
secondary
sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current
866 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{
unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:
Thanks!-- DASHBot ( talk) 18:14, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on
McGill Science Undergraduate Research Journal requesting that it be
speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a
repost of material that was previously deleted following a
deletion process at
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/McGill Science Undergraduate Research Journal]. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, place the template {{
hang on}} underneath the other template on the article and put a note on the page's
discussion page saying why this article should stay. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use
deletion review instead of continuing to recreate the page. Thank you.
Abductive (
reasoning)
18:59, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:MSURJ Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk 02:20, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
Template:SocialismOpenTask has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer • (
What did I screw up now?)
05:01, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
The article Siahat-e gharb has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No indication of notability.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. ♠
PMC♠
(talk)
19:49, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Qehemblem.gif. I notice it currently doesn't have an image copyright tag.
Could you add one to let us know its copyright status? (You can use {{gfdl}} if you release it under the GFDL, or {{fairuse}} if you claim fair use, etc.) If you don't know what any of this means, just let me know where you got the images and I'll tag them for you.
Thanks so much, Zzyzx11 (Talk) 06:09, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
Yep. Cool. (Actually, I think there's a coding problem with the "incumbent succession box" template that isn't present in "succession box", but I'm not good enough at template coding to find it...) Bearcat 01:54, 5 August 2005 (UTC)
Your section "Pages of interest" links "reading". The page "Reading" should not ordinarily be linked directly. If you mean one of the specific meanings of "Reading" (e.g. Reading (activity)), please link the relevant page directly, and if you mean the disambiguation page, please link Reading (disambiguation). I would make the edit myself, but I am unable to discern which meaning is appropriate. Thanks, Duckbill 13:29, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
I have added a "{{
prod}}" template to the article
Alice Porlock, suggesting that it be deleted according to the
proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "
What Wikipedia is not" and
Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the
proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the
speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to
Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.
Propaniac
16:31, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
A template you created,
Template:Queen Elizabeth High School infobox, has been marked for deletion as a deprecated and orphaned template. If, after 14 days, there has been no objection, the template will be deleted. If you wish to object to its deletion, please list your objection
here and feel free to remove the {{
deprecated}}
tag from the template. If you feel the deletion is appropriate, no further action is necessary. Thanks for your attention.
Bryan Derksen (
talk)
04:00, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading Image:Msurjvol3iss1.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:
Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI ( talk) 20:55, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
Hello M87! Thank you for your contributions. I am a
bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is an
Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add
reliable,
secondary
sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current
866 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{
unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:
Thanks!-- DASHBot ( talk) 18:14, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on
McGill Science Undergraduate Research Journal requesting that it be
speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a
repost of material that was previously deleted following a
deletion process at
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/McGill Science Undergraduate Research Journal]. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, place the template {{
hang on}} underneath the other template on the article and put a note on the page's
discussion page saying why this article should stay. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use
deletion review instead of continuing to recreate the page. Thank you.
Abductive (
reasoning)
18:59, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:MSURJ Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk 02:20, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
Template:SocialismOpenTask has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer • (
What did I screw up now?)
05:01, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
The article Siahat-e gharb has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No indication of notability.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. ♠
PMC♠
(talk)
19:49, 20 May 2020 (UTC)