Archive number 2 of my talk page, created on April 22 2006.
Hiya, thanks for your comments on my talk page. I had marked the Unitarian Democratic Coalition article for cleanup because there was quite a large blank space on the page which didn't look very good. I think someone fixed the problem quite soon after I tagged it.
Portugal *is* a lovely country and I would love to come back. A dear friend of mine is from Lisbon and I'd like to visit her family there once again some day. Take care. aliceinlampyland 14:54, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
You may want to add to your user page [[category:WikiProject_Electronics_members]] Well as the project needs members (well I think it does) you are definatly a member -- A dam1213 Talk + 00:46, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading Image:Soeiro pereira gomes portrait.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{ GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{ Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Longhair 06:49, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
Obrigado pelo teu apoio na candidatura do artigo History of Portugal (1777-1834) a featured article. Já agora, se fôr do teu agrado e se tiveres tempo, gostaria de contar contigo na construção de History of Portugal (1834-1910). Muito obrigado. Gameiro 02:24, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
Hi Alfonso Thanks for your input. The -politician-stubs are often used for both holders of a political office and for important people associated with a given ideology. For stub sorting purposes, I would e.g. characterize Karl Marx as a politician (although he never held any political office) as well as a philosopher and an economist. If these people were non-notable members of the Communist Party, I'd be very glad if you'd correct my mistakes and also remove them from the Category:Portuguese communists, otherwise I think other stub sorters might make the same error (the problem is that there are simply too many stub articles left to sort, so it is impossible to read more than a small number of them.) If somebody is equally associated with both politics and another trade, it would be very relevant to assign him to both a -politician-stub and e.g. artist-stub. Sorry about the mix-up. Regards. -- Valentinian 00:50, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
Nice to see articles, created by you about such a great (at least in the past) event! By the way, I have a commemorative 1 ruble coin, released in the Soviet Union in 1985, with the emblem of the 12th festival, held in Moscow. Possibly, I'll scan it in the future and upload into the Wiki. Cmapm 23:45, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
I'm sorry for offending you on the FAC nomination page. You were right: I am impatient. My comments were too harsh. I've started to make edits to the PCP page again. I have nothing against Communists nor against the PCP; I just want to make the article fair and comprehensible. Best wishes, and again, my sincere apologies. Hydriotaphia 02:17, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Smith_chart_1602.gif. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).
The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are
open content,
public domain, and
fair use. Find the appropriate template in
Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}
.
Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator.
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have questions about copyright tagging of images, post on Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags or User talk:Carnildo/images. 21:21, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
Obrigado! Thanks for the award. I'm affraid I'll need to answer "in the same coin" (nevermind the Portuguese expression). So, here it goes! Congratulations! Gameiro
É agradável ver que depois desta troca de cortesias te viras logo para o trabalho. Vamos a isto! Alguma ajuda que precisares é só pedir, até porque gosto de fazer daqueles edits intermináveis, do género, acrescentar um template em 678 artigos. São bons para o stress. Como podes ver fui eu que acrescentei a pronúncia de todos os concelhos portugueses.
Já agora, recentemente trabalhei a lista de presidentes de Portugal e tentei propô-la para featured list. No entanto foi desde logo recusada pelo facto da maioria das fotografias dos presidentes não terem copyright tag. O favor que te pedia era se me conseguias arranjar fotografias de qualidade dos presidentes, e se possível dos primeiros-ministros, já que pinturas (que não estão protegidas) não são o mais apropriado se existem fotografias boas. Agradeço-te desde já. Gameiro 21:46, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
Desculpa vir chatear outra vez. Era só para te agradecer o trabalho com a imagens dos presidentes. Esperemos que não venham os picuinhas outra vez apontar-nos o dedo. No entando gostava de criticar uma inclusão da tua parte de uma pintura do Carmona, não é que ilustre mal, mas não me parece ficar bem quando todos os outros desde 1910 (para não falar dos reis D. Pedro V, D. Luís, D. Carlos e D. Manuel II) têm uma fotografia. Se não te importas vou mudar para a que está no artigo Óscar Carmona. Obrigado!. Gameiro 01:37, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
Considera-te já parte da equipa de manutenção. Adiciona-te aqui. Depois é so fazeres o que quiseres em prol do portal. Eu estava a pensar num (ou mais) WikiProject(s) para tentar manter uma maneira dos artigos sobre Portugal (biografias, locais, eventos históricos, etc) terem todos o mesmo esquema de construção. Por exemplo, como podes ver em Portal:United Kingdom. Se calhar um WikiProject:Portuguese geography e um WikiProject:Portuguese people vinham a calhar. Isto sem querer ser megalómano, mas uma colaboração da semana também era uma boa ideia. Falamos então na talk do portal. Um abraço! Gameiro 15:56, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
O erro foi meu quando inicialmente fiz o template, por isso faço questão de o corrigir. Eu para não meter muita água escrevo sempre tudo no word, só q esta deve ter escapado. De qualquer forma é relativamente facil encontrar as paginas onde o erro está presente, basta fazer pesquisa por "|ocasion". João Correia 00:52, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
Muito obrigado pela ajuda. Um Abraço. João Correia 01:02, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
Wow! Great work so far! I hope you won't stop in the middle :) So here are some comments:
Everything I sdaid here is just my comments and suggestions. I hope you'll find it helpful and you don't have to listen to me :) Once in a while I am too perfectionist :) You are doing an absolutely marvelous job by yourself! Renata 16:39, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
I didn't know that the other template existed when I created mine. You can switch them all to one or the other if you prefer. I do, however, think that it looks better to not show the table borders in the template. Other than that, I don't care too much about which one gets used. Kaldari 18:32, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
The Braga page sucks with all those parishes listed. You just went ahead and changed it without any discussion. Maluka 07:20, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
You made a lot of suggestions and I still stand firm in my convictions that the list ruins the page, but that's not the real deal here.
http://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Braga is the page that people living in another country should see, not the one that's up. Tourism is being pushed and it's vital to this desperate economy and if the English page was like the Portuguese page, it would make Braga more appealing and would perhaps draw tourists North, instead of thinking Portugal is nothing but Lisboa and Algarve. That's the impression most people have who have never been here and the places pushed by travel agents in other countries, especially the UK and the US.
Do you think non-Portuguese people are interested or impressed by the names of the parishes? They want to know what there is to see and to do. They don't care about parishes, freguesias or municipalities. Stating the number is enough for the English wiki. Is it too much work to add the places that are on the pt. one or to translate it to English. They don't even appear to be related. Maluka 17:42, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
In regards to your comments on my user page, if I were fluent in Portuguese it wouldn't be a problem. I've lived here 10 years, long enough to know Braga and my husband is Portuguese. You may not think someone from another country could understand the politics of not only Braga, but Portugal, but believe me, I do.
I never said this was a place for tourists, yet people refer to Wikipedia for quick reference, be it for travel plans or curiosity about the place. My mother told me she read the English Braga page and was dismayed there was so little there. If she could read Portuguese, I'd refer her to the pt. page and then she would be impressed.
Why are there two? Why can't they be the same? I get the feeling you have no idea where I'm coming from and are blind to any ideas that don't jibe with your own. Maluka 08:45, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
Ohboy, now you've taken the offensive. I can't believe you said you don't care about Braga. Also you call Freguesias parishes, when in fact parish is religious. Learn the difference between the two. I don't understand why you have a problem with this page in English and why you insist on listing the FREGUESIAS. NOBODY CARES!!!!! No, I am not Portuguese, but I live the Portuguese life, not like some Brit expat who's taking over Algarve. I care that Braga is given the best on the English page and you don't give a flying F**k.
Maluka
03:25, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
I've done your homework for you.
Distrito, Concelho and Freguesia are the present administrative divisions of Portugal. The smaller is the freguesia, that are grouped in Concelhos that are grouped in Distritos.
Paroquia (parish in English) is the smallest religious (catholic) division, and they are grouped in Vigararias (wich are "invisible" in genealogical terms) that are grouped in Dioceses (or Bispados, Arquidioceses -Braga and Evora- or Patriarcados - this last only in Lisboa).
Do you understand now that Parish does NOT mean Freguesia????? Maluka 03:32, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading Image:Estudante agredido pt.JPG. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{ GFDL-self}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{ Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Shyam ( T/ C) 20:10, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
Estive mais uma vez a observar o teu magnífico trabalho com a lista de municípios e reparei numa coisa que me chamou a atenção. Eu lembro-me de ver na altura das eleições autárquicas quer o Rui Rio a candidatar-se pelo PSD, pelo CDS-PP, pelo MPT e pelo PPM e o Carmona Rodrigues pelo PSD, MPT e PPM. Julgo que nem o MPT nem o PPM conseguiram vereadores mas acho que, pelo menos, a câmara do Porto é PSD/CDS-PP. Não conseguias esclarecer isto e corrigir a lista e o mapa caso fosse necessário? Obrigado. Um abraço. Gameiro 22:38, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
I thought I was through with you but nope, I have another beef. Why do you discuss things about an ENGLISH site in Portuguese? I have a basic understanding of what's said, but this isn't the Portuguese site. Please, keep it in English. Maluka 08:07, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
Do you have a specific example where the bar sizes doesn't appear to be correct? eg. either a specific user on a specific server, or just copy-n-paste the URL. -- Interiot 16:19, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
I just added my name to the list. As long as you meet the membership requirements, you can join! ςפקι Д Иτς ☺ ☻ 16:25, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
I'm not interested in the legal stuff. Lets ignore whether this is to do with images or not. The point is that some objections were raised prior to FAL. The objections were resolved by removing the offending content from the article. After going to FAL, the content was restored. I think there needs to be at a least a brief note in the talk page saying that you now consider the images to be OK and that the issues have been addressed. I'm sorry the other guy failed to be helpful when you asked his advise. Colin° Talk 12:16, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
Desculpa lá estas últimas semanas. Não tenho tido mesmo muito tempo para isto é tenho descuidado um bocadinho quer o portal quer a fantástica lista dos municípios que estás a fazer. Aproveito para congratular-te pela lista dos presidentes também, que já está com as fotografias. Quanto ao portal digo-te que estou um bocadinho desanimado também. Dá um bocado a ideia de sermos só nós e o Pedro os únicos membros portugueses activos. Já viste a colaboração... É um bocado desanimador. Mas pronto, a partir de hoje volto a ter tempo disponível para me dedicar ao vício. Se calhar vou parar um bocado com a história recente e vou ver se ponho de pé o Prehistoric Portugal e o Pre-Roman Portugal. E se calhar começo com stubs para os primeiros-ministros. Entretanto, alguma coisa diz. Um abraço! Gameiro 19:11, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
Is this what you were referring to? It seems he did respond: [1]. Perhaps it would have been better if he took more time to talk to you... but there are over 400,000 images on En Wikipedia. Almost all the tag maintenance is done by a handful of users (about 20 in total, but most are inactive at any given time). I'm not sure what Carnildo's workload is like, but I know that I tag several thousand images per week (due to new uploads!)... and I'm only tagging things which are mostly to be deleted, I think Carnildo does even more work than I. I know from talking to him that he is very open to discussion, but many of the suggestions people come up with are unworkable based on the scale of our work (could you imagine writing thousands of personal messages a week in addition to the regular work?) and many of the people who contact us are overtly hostile.. It's understandable that people become upset when their favorite images are removed, but can you imagine that every time you do a batch of good work you are guaranteed a flock of angry uninformed people will come yelling? It really is dreadful work at times, but is it so important because without it our project will fail one of it's two primary goals (free content). ... I don't think that a change in vote from you will change the outcome at this point, the memory of the Wiki is too long and too callous. But I do know that I really need Carnildo's help and I feel sure the project does too, especially as an admin, because he is one of very few who I can trust to work consistently even when people mistreat him. I hope you can find room to reconsider your position, but if not I understand... Everyone is entitled to their own priorities. :) -- Gmaxwell 05:51, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
That "thanks" was a bit sarcastic when the article became featured. I know he has lots of work and he may be very busy, but he objected a FL candidate due to image tags, then I addressed him and he said nothing. How much uploaders he finds in this context? I asked him politely, unlike what he did in the objection, because I really wanted the article to be featured. At least he removed his objection after I removed the pictures, but he said nothing about the pictures. I know he is not god and he may commit errors, and he made errors bigger than this one, but if he does a good work he should be forgiven, after all, he didn't killed anyone, it's just wikipedia, I'll strike out my comment. And, by the way, if you have time, could you take a look on the status of the pictures of the List of Presidents of Portugal? I changed the tags and I reintroduced the pictures, because the article looks stupid without them. If you are too busy just forget. Regards.
I'm glad you found my suggestions helpful. Best of luck with the article; I think it's pretty close to qualifying for featured-article status. Hydriotaphia 13:48, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
I believe that it should be enough to simply specify a width, either in % or pixels for a given cell to have it fixed to that width. If all cells are specified to have the same width, then they should not resize. Have you tried that? - Splash talk 04:01, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
A lista é principalmente tua. Eu fiz uns míseros 6 ou 7 municípios... Tu é que mereces uns "Parabéns!" Quanto ao Freixo de Espada Cinta, sempre ouvi dizer que era sem o "à", mas já enviei uma pergunta para o Ciberdúvidas da Língua Portuguesa e estou à espera da resposta. Quanto ao Castanheira de Pera, vi que era esta a forma correcta em pt:Castanheira de Pera. Já no Corvo, para funcionar o link para "Parishes" simplesmente coloquei a informação sobre o facto de ser o único município sem freguesias sob o subtítulo parishes. Vou então, votar na lista e ver o portal. Um abraço!
Mário/archive2, thank you for supporting me in my recent RfA. Although it did not succeed as no consensus was declared (final: 65/29/7), I know that there is always an opportunity to request adminship again. If and when that day comes, I hope you will once again support me. If at any time I make any mistakes or if you would like to comment on my contributions to Wikipedia, you are more than welcome to do so. Regardless of your religious, cultural, and personal beliefs, I pray that whatever and whoever motivates you in life continues to guide you on the most righteous path. |
The JPS 15:18, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
Would it be possible for someone to generate a Smith chart image from scratch and then upload it? It would avoid the entire situation if that was the case. -- Fastfission 21:53, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for fixing my mistake; I was working with an out-of-date version when I cleaned up the spam. Cheers, OhNo itsJamie Talk 22:31, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
[2]. — Apr. 20, '06 [20:46] < freakofnurxture | talk>
Hi, there are no specific tasks on Wikipedia:WikiProject Porto just yet, but I'm guessing you do a fair bit of translation from P'guese location articles, so you could find plenty, especially about parishes and areas in Porto itself. You could also sign up to the project, that doesn't tie you in to any level of commitment, also it will help show other ed's that it's a serious project. Nice one, Deizio 11:18, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
Archive number 2 of my talk page, created on April 22 2006.
Hiya, thanks for your comments on my talk page. I had marked the Unitarian Democratic Coalition article for cleanup because there was quite a large blank space on the page which didn't look very good. I think someone fixed the problem quite soon after I tagged it.
Portugal *is* a lovely country and I would love to come back. A dear friend of mine is from Lisbon and I'd like to visit her family there once again some day. Take care. aliceinlampyland 14:54, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
You may want to add to your user page [[category:WikiProject_Electronics_members]] Well as the project needs members (well I think it does) you are definatly a member -- A dam1213 Talk + 00:46, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading Image:Soeiro pereira gomes portrait.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{ GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{ Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Longhair 06:49, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
Obrigado pelo teu apoio na candidatura do artigo History of Portugal (1777-1834) a featured article. Já agora, se fôr do teu agrado e se tiveres tempo, gostaria de contar contigo na construção de History of Portugal (1834-1910). Muito obrigado. Gameiro 02:24, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
Hi Alfonso Thanks for your input. The -politician-stubs are often used for both holders of a political office and for important people associated with a given ideology. For stub sorting purposes, I would e.g. characterize Karl Marx as a politician (although he never held any political office) as well as a philosopher and an economist. If these people were non-notable members of the Communist Party, I'd be very glad if you'd correct my mistakes and also remove them from the Category:Portuguese communists, otherwise I think other stub sorters might make the same error (the problem is that there are simply too many stub articles left to sort, so it is impossible to read more than a small number of them.) If somebody is equally associated with both politics and another trade, it would be very relevant to assign him to both a -politician-stub and e.g. artist-stub. Sorry about the mix-up. Regards. -- Valentinian 00:50, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
Nice to see articles, created by you about such a great (at least in the past) event! By the way, I have a commemorative 1 ruble coin, released in the Soviet Union in 1985, with the emblem of the 12th festival, held in Moscow. Possibly, I'll scan it in the future and upload into the Wiki. Cmapm 23:45, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
I'm sorry for offending you on the FAC nomination page. You were right: I am impatient. My comments were too harsh. I've started to make edits to the PCP page again. I have nothing against Communists nor against the PCP; I just want to make the article fair and comprehensible. Best wishes, and again, my sincere apologies. Hydriotaphia 02:17, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Smith_chart_1602.gif. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).
The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are
open content,
public domain, and
fair use. Find the appropriate template in
Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}
.
Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator.
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have questions about copyright tagging of images, post on Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags or User talk:Carnildo/images. 21:21, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
Obrigado! Thanks for the award. I'm affraid I'll need to answer "in the same coin" (nevermind the Portuguese expression). So, here it goes! Congratulations! Gameiro
É agradável ver que depois desta troca de cortesias te viras logo para o trabalho. Vamos a isto! Alguma ajuda que precisares é só pedir, até porque gosto de fazer daqueles edits intermináveis, do género, acrescentar um template em 678 artigos. São bons para o stress. Como podes ver fui eu que acrescentei a pronúncia de todos os concelhos portugueses.
Já agora, recentemente trabalhei a lista de presidentes de Portugal e tentei propô-la para featured list. No entanto foi desde logo recusada pelo facto da maioria das fotografias dos presidentes não terem copyright tag. O favor que te pedia era se me conseguias arranjar fotografias de qualidade dos presidentes, e se possível dos primeiros-ministros, já que pinturas (que não estão protegidas) não são o mais apropriado se existem fotografias boas. Agradeço-te desde já. Gameiro 21:46, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
Desculpa vir chatear outra vez. Era só para te agradecer o trabalho com a imagens dos presidentes. Esperemos que não venham os picuinhas outra vez apontar-nos o dedo. No entando gostava de criticar uma inclusão da tua parte de uma pintura do Carmona, não é que ilustre mal, mas não me parece ficar bem quando todos os outros desde 1910 (para não falar dos reis D. Pedro V, D. Luís, D. Carlos e D. Manuel II) têm uma fotografia. Se não te importas vou mudar para a que está no artigo Óscar Carmona. Obrigado!. Gameiro 01:37, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
Considera-te já parte da equipa de manutenção. Adiciona-te aqui. Depois é so fazeres o que quiseres em prol do portal. Eu estava a pensar num (ou mais) WikiProject(s) para tentar manter uma maneira dos artigos sobre Portugal (biografias, locais, eventos históricos, etc) terem todos o mesmo esquema de construção. Por exemplo, como podes ver em Portal:United Kingdom. Se calhar um WikiProject:Portuguese geography e um WikiProject:Portuguese people vinham a calhar. Isto sem querer ser megalómano, mas uma colaboração da semana também era uma boa ideia. Falamos então na talk do portal. Um abraço! Gameiro 15:56, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
O erro foi meu quando inicialmente fiz o template, por isso faço questão de o corrigir. Eu para não meter muita água escrevo sempre tudo no word, só q esta deve ter escapado. De qualquer forma é relativamente facil encontrar as paginas onde o erro está presente, basta fazer pesquisa por "|ocasion". João Correia 00:52, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
Muito obrigado pela ajuda. Um Abraço. João Correia 01:02, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
Wow! Great work so far! I hope you won't stop in the middle :) So here are some comments:
Everything I sdaid here is just my comments and suggestions. I hope you'll find it helpful and you don't have to listen to me :) Once in a while I am too perfectionist :) You are doing an absolutely marvelous job by yourself! Renata 16:39, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
I didn't know that the other template existed when I created mine. You can switch them all to one or the other if you prefer. I do, however, think that it looks better to not show the table borders in the template. Other than that, I don't care too much about which one gets used. Kaldari 18:32, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
The Braga page sucks with all those parishes listed. You just went ahead and changed it without any discussion. Maluka 07:20, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
You made a lot of suggestions and I still stand firm in my convictions that the list ruins the page, but that's not the real deal here.
http://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Braga is the page that people living in another country should see, not the one that's up. Tourism is being pushed and it's vital to this desperate economy and if the English page was like the Portuguese page, it would make Braga more appealing and would perhaps draw tourists North, instead of thinking Portugal is nothing but Lisboa and Algarve. That's the impression most people have who have never been here and the places pushed by travel agents in other countries, especially the UK and the US.
Do you think non-Portuguese people are interested or impressed by the names of the parishes? They want to know what there is to see and to do. They don't care about parishes, freguesias or municipalities. Stating the number is enough for the English wiki. Is it too much work to add the places that are on the pt. one or to translate it to English. They don't even appear to be related. Maluka 17:42, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
In regards to your comments on my user page, if I were fluent in Portuguese it wouldn't be a problem. I've lived here 10 years, long enough to know Braga and my husband is Portuguese. You may not think someone from another country could understand the politics of not only Braga, but Portugal, but believe me, I do.
I never said this was a place for tourists, yet people refer to Wikipedia for quick reference, be it for travel plans or curiosity about the place. My mother told me she read the English Braga page and was dismayed there was so little there. If she could read Portuguese, I'd refer her to the pt. page and then she would be impressed.
Why are there two? Why can't they be the same? I get the feeling you have no idea where I'm coming from and are blind to any ideas that don't jibe with your own. Maluka 08:45, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
Ohboy, now you've taken the offensive. I can't believe you said you don't care about Braga. Also you call Freguesias parishes, when in fact parish is religious. Learn the difference between the two. I don't understand why you have a problem with this page in English and why you insist on listing the FREGUESIAS. NOBODY CARES!!!!! No, I am not Portuguese, but I live the Portuguese life, not like some Brit expat who's taking over Algarve. I care that Braga is given the best on the English page and you don't give a flying F**k.
Maluka
03:25, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
I've done your homework for you.
Distrito, Concelho and Freguesia are the present administrative divisions of Portugal. The smaller is the freguesia, that are grouped in Concelhos that are grouped in Distritos.
Paroquia (parish in English) is the smallest religious (catholic) division, and they are grouped in Vigararias (wich are "invisible" in genealogical terms) that are grouped in Dioceses (or Bispados, Arquidioceses -Braga and Evora- or Patriarcados - this last only in Lisboa).
Do you understand now that Parish does NOT mean Freguesia????? Maluka 03:32, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading Image:Estudante agredido pt.JPG. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{ GFDL-self}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{ Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Shyam ( T/ C) 20:10, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
Estive mais uma vez a observar o teu magnífico trabalho com a lista de municípios e reparei numa coisa que me chamou a atenção. Eu lembro-me de ver na altura das eleições autárquicas quer o Rui Rio a candidatar-se pelo PSD, pelo CDS-PP, pelo MPT e pelo PPM e o Carmona Rodrigues pelo PSD, MPT e PPM. Julgo que nem o MPT nem o PPM conseguiram vereadores mas acho que, pelo menos, a câmara do Porto é PSD/CDS-PP. Não conseguias esclarecer isto e corrigir a lista e o mapa caso fosse necessário? Obrigado. Um abraço. Gameiro 22:38, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
I thought I was through with you but nope, I have another beef. Why do you discuss things about an ENGLISH site in Portuguese? I have a basic understanding of what's said, but this isn't the Portuguese site. Please, keep it in English. Maluka 08:07, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
Do you have a specific example where the bar sizes doesn't appear to be correct? eg. either a specific user on a specific server, or just copy-n-paste the URL. -- Interiot 16:19, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
I just added my name to the list. As long as you meet the membership requirements, you can join! ςפקι Д Иτς ☺ ☻ 16:25, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
I'm not interested in the legal stuff. Lets ignore whether this is to do with images or not. The point is that some objections were raised prior to FAL. The objections were resolved by removing the offending content from the article. After going to FAL, the content was restored. I think there needs to be at a least a brief note in the talk page saying that you now consider the images to be OK and that the issues have been addressed. I'm sorry the other guy failed to be helpful when you asked his advise. Colin° Talk 12:16, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
Desculpa lá estas últimas semanas. Não tenho tido mesmo muito tempo para isto é tenho descuidado um bocadinho quer o portal quer a fantástica lista dos municípios que estás a fazer. Aproveito para congratular-te pela lista dos presidentes também, que já está com as fotografias. Quanto ao portal digo-te que estou um bocadinho desanimado também. Dá um bocado a ideia de sermos só nós e o Pedro os únicos membros portugueses activos. Já viste a colaboração... É um bocado desanimador. Mas pronto, a partir de hoje volto a ter tempo disponível para me dedicar ao vício. Se calhar vou parar um bocado com a história recente e vou ver se ponho de pé o Prehistoric Portugal e o Pre-Roman Portugal. E se calhar começo com stubs para os primeiros-ministros. Entretanto, alguma coisa diz. Um abraço! Gameiro 19:11, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
Is this what you were referring to? It seems he did respond: [1]. Perhaps it would have been better if he took more time to talk to you... but there are over 400,000 images on En Wikipedia. Almost all the tag maintenance is done by a handful of users (about 20 in total, but most are inactive at any given time). I'm not sure what Carnildo's workload is like, but I know that I tag several thousand images per week (due to new uploads!)... and I'm only tagging things which are mostly to be deleted, I think Carnildo does even more work than I. I know from talking to him that he is very open to discussion, but many of the suggestions people come up with are unworkable based on the scale of our work (could you imagine writing thousands of personal messages a week in addition to the regular work?) and many of the people who contact us are overtly hostile.. It's understandable that people become upset when their favorite images are removed, but can you imagine that every time you do a batch of good work you are guaranteed a flock of angry uninformed people will come yelling? It really is dreadful work at times, but is it so important because without it our project will fail one of it's two primary goals (free content). ... I don't think that a change in vote from you will change the outcome at this point, the memory of the Wiki is too long and too callous. But I do know that I really need Carnildo's help and I feel sure the project does too, especially as an admin, because he is one of very few who I can trust to work consistently even when people mistreat him. I hope you can find room to reconsider your position, but if not I understand... Everyone is entitled to their own priorities. :) -- Gmaxwell 05:51, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
That "thanks" was a bit sarcastic when the article became featured. I know he has lots of work and he may be very busy, but he objected a FL candidate due to image tags, then I addressed him and he said nothing. How much uploaders he finds in this context? I asked him politely, unlike what he did in the objection, because I really wanted the article to be featured. At least he removed his objection after I removed the pictures, but he said nothing about the pictures. I know he is not god and he may commit errors, and he made errors bigger than this one, but if he does a good work he should be forgiven, after all, he didn't killed anyone, it's just wikipedia, I'll strike out my comment. And, by the way, if you have time, could you take a look on the status of the pictures of the List of Presidents of Portugal? I changed the tags and I reintroduced the pictures, because the article looks stupid without them. If you are too busy just forget. Regards.
I'm glad you found my suggestions helpful. Best of luck with the article; I think it's pretty close to qualifying for featured-article status. Hydriotaphia 13:48, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
I believe that it should be enough to simply specify a width, either in % or pixels for a given cell to have it fixed to that width. If all cells are specified to have the same width, then they should not resize. Have you tried that? - Splash talk 04:01, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
A lista é principalmente tua. Eu fiz uns míseros 6 ou 7 municípios... Tu é que mereces uns "Parabéns!" Quanto ao Freixo de Espada Cinta, sempre ouvi dizer que era sem o "à", mas já enviei uma pergunta para o Ciberdúvidas da Língua Portuguesa e estou à espera da resposta. Quanto ao Castanheira de Pera, vi que era esta a forma correcta em pt:Castanheira de Pera. Já no Corvo, para funcionar o link para "Parishes" simplesmente coloquei a informação sobre o facto de ser o único município sem freguesias sob o subtítulo parishes. Vou então, votar na lista e ver o portal. Um abraço!
Mário/archive2, thank you for supporting me in my recent RfA. Although it did not succeed as no consensus was declared (final: 65/29/7), I know that there is always an opportunity to request adminship again. If and when that day comes, I hope you will once again support me. If at any time I make any mistakes or if you would like to comment on my contributions to Wikipedia, you are more than welcome to do so. Regardless of your religious, cultural, and personal beliefs, I pray that whatever and whoever motivates you in life continues to guide you on the most righteous path. |
The JPS 15:18, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
Would it be possible for someone to generate a Smith chart image from scratch and then upload it? It would avoid the entire situation if that was the case. -- Fastfission 21:53, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for fixing my mistake; I was working with an out-of-date version when I cleaned up the spam. Cheers, OhNo itsJamie Talk 22:31, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
[2]. — Apr. 20, '06 [20:46] < freakofnurxture | talk>
Hi, there are no specific tasks on Wikipedia:WikiProject Porto just yet, but I'm guessing you do a fair bit of translation from P'guese location articles, so you could find plenty, especially about parishes and areas in Porto itself. You could also sign up to the project, that doesn't tie you in to any level of commitment, also it will help show other ed's that it's a serious project. Nice one, Deizio 11:18, 23 April 2006 (UTC)