Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate
your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to
Christmas tree, it appears that you have added
original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses
combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a
reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the
tutorial on citing sources. Thank you.
Ifnord (
talk)
15:00, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
Hi Lyndsay Dart! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 9 December 2021 (UTC) |
![]() |
Hi Lyndsay Dart! The thread you created at the
Wikipedia:Teahouse, You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please .
|
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Elon Musk have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
Thank you. ClueBot NG ( talk) 19:56, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to
Elon Musk, did not appear to be constructive and have been
reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our
policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our
welcome page which also provides further information about
contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your
sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on
my talk page. Please stop attempting to push a pro-Musk tone. All of the edits you have proposed have already been discussed and declined.
QRep2020 (
talk)
21:57, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
Hello, and
welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly
reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at
Elon Musk. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "
edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the
normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a
consensus on the
talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. OhKayeSierra ( talk) 22:29, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Elon Musk. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. OhKayeSierra ( talk) 23:53, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. The thread is
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Lyndsay_Dart reported by User:Andyjsmith (Result: ). Thank you.
Andyjsmith (
talk)
23:52, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate
your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to
Christmas tree, it appears that you have added
original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses
combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a
reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the
tutorial on citing sources. Thank you.
Ifnord (
talk)
15:00, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
Hi Lyndsay Dart! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 9 December 2021 (UTC) |
![]() |
Hi Lyndsay Dart! The thread you created at the
Wikipedia:Teahouse, You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please .
|
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Elon Musk have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
Thank you. ClueBot NG ( talk) 19:56, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to
Elon Musk, did not appear to be constructive and have been
reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our
policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our
welcome page which also provides further information about
contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your
sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on
my talk page. Please stop attempting to push a pro-Musk tone. All of the edits you have proposed have already been discussed and declined.
QRep2020 (
talk)
21:57, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
Hello, and
welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly
reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at
Elon Musk. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "
edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the
normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a
consensus on the
talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. OhKayeSierra ( talk) 22:29, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Elon Musk. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. OhKayeSierra ( talk) 23:53, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. The thread is
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Lyndsay_Dart reported by User:Andyjsmith (Result: ). Thank you.
Andyjsmith (
talk)
23:52, 24 December 2021 (UTC)