|
Please read this notification carefully, it contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.
A community decision has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to the Syrian Civil War and the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant. The details of these sanctions are described here. All pages that are broadly related to these topics are subject to a one revert per twenty-four hours restriction, as described here.
General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.
-- NeilN talk to me 04:46, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
Hi, You reverted my edit twice, in violation of the Edit Notice on Khan Shaykhun chemical attack page. Please revert yourself so I don't have to report this to the Administrators' noticeboard. If someone else wants to revert my edit, that's fine, but you're not allowed to do it two times in a row. And for the record, I had already "seen" the talk page before making my edit. Thanks for your understanding. Terrorist96 ( talk) 02:09, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's
no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or
synthesis into articles, as you did at
Khan Shaykhun chemical attack, you may be
blocked from editing.
Erlbaeko (
talk)
14:58, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#LylaSand is a topic about you at WP:AN. Please respond there if you want to.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 18:58, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
@ BU Rob13: Do these edits not exceed 1RR? Terrorist96 ( talk) 18:12, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. ~
Rob13
Talk
00:04, 4 May 2017 (UTC)In this edit [1], you deliberately entered information that is false into the lede of the article. Major no-no. It's bad enough you are an SPA (and most likely a sock - edits such as these from the beginning [2]), if this sort of thing continues, I will make the case for you to be topic banned. You are on notice. Khirurg ( talk) 04:36, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
I have been editing for months before i created this account. This is my ip 68.199.221.23 ( talk) 15:29, 26 May 2017 (UTC) LylaSand ( talk) 15:29, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Also my information was not false. You just didn't read properly. LylaSand ( talk) 15:30, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
regarding the /info/en/?search=Douma_chemical_attack#Media_investigations
you deliberately made a false interpretation of the content quoted. When I introduced the literal, you again condensed it in a very distorting manner. Why are you doing this? I think this is edit warring! It seems not to be the first time you show this behaviour. -- BestHealthGuide ( talk) 06:32, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
|
Please read this notification carefully, it contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.
A community decision has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to the Syrian Civil War and the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant. The details of these sanctions are described here. All pages that are broadly related to these topics are subject to a one revert per twenty-four hours restriction, as described here.
General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.
-- NeilN talk to me 04:46, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
Hi, You reverted my edit twice, in violation of the Edit Notice on Khan Shaykhun chemical attack page. Please revert yourself so I don't have to report this to the Administrators' noticeboard. If someone else wants to revert my edit, that's fine, but you're not allowed to do it two times in a row. And for the record, I had already "seen" the talk page before making my edit. Thanks for your understanding. Terrorist96 ( talk) 02:09, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's
no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or
synthesis into articles, as you did at
Khan Shaykhun chemical attack, you may be
blocked from editing.
Erlbaeko (
talk)
14:58, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#LylaSand is a topic about you at WP:AN. Please respond there if you want to.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 18:58, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
@ BU Rob13: Do these edits not exceed 1RR? Terrorist96 ( talk) 18:12, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. ~
Rob13
Talk
00:04, 4 May 2017 (UTC)In this edit [1], you deliberately entered information that is false into the lede of the article. Major no-no. It's bad enough you are an SPA (and most likely a sock - edits such as these from the beginning [2]), if this sort of thing continues, I will make the case for you to be topic banned. You are on notice. Khirurg ( talk) 04:36, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
I have been editing for months before i created this account. This is my ip 68.199.221.23 ( talk) 15:29, 26 May 2017 (UTC) LylaSand ( talk) 15:29, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Also my information was not false. You just didn't read properly. LylaSand ( talk) 15:30, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
regarding the /info/en/?search=Douma_chemical_attack#Media_investigations
you deliberately made a false interpretation of the content quoted. When I introduced the literal, you again condensed it in a very distorting manner. Why are you doing this? I think this is edit warring! It seems not to be the first time you show this behaviour. -- BestHealthGuide ( talk) 06:32, 23 April 2018 (UTC)